US4830192A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Methods of discriminating between contaminated and uncontaminated containers
Assignee: Coca-Cola Co
•
Filing: 1987-07-23
•
Granted: 1989-05-16
•
Expires: 2007-07-23
Abstract
Abstract Methods of discriminating between contaminated and uncontaminated containers prior to washing is disclosed characterized by the testing of the residue of the container to determine if the residue is residue of the original product packed in the container. If the residue is not sufficiently similar to the original product, the container is rejected as contaminated.
Inventors
- 👤 George Plester
- 👤 Warren E. Leddon
- 👤 David E. Dalsis
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 15:14
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/84; G01N21/88; G01N21/90; B; B07; B07C; B07C5/00; B07C5/34; B07C5/3404; B07C5/3408; G01N21/9018; G01N21/9081; G01N33/00; G01N33/0078; G01N33/0081; G01N35/00; G01N35/00584; G01N35/00594; G01N35/00603; G01N21/17; G01N21/25; G01N21/31
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
219 words
A method for discriminating between a contaminated container and an uncontaminated container from a population of containers which were once filled with product to be consumed comprising the steps of: generating a signal representative of at least one physical response generated by a sample of product residue; generating at least one physical response from a sample residue in each container; comparing the physical response of the sample residue with the signal representative of the physical response of a product residue; and rejecting the container when the physical response of the sample residue does not correlate to the physical response of the product residue, whereby complex analytical systems for detecting a large number of unknown contaminants is avoided by reducing the analytical problem to the detection of known and relatively few products whose presence is used to indicate that the container was not contaminated; the steps of generating physical responses from product residue and sample residues comprising, directing electromagnetic energy to the residues from a light source, measuring the quality and quantity of electromagnetic energy that interacts with the residues, transmitting signals indicative of the quality and quantity of the electromagnetic energy measured, and collecting color information about the product and sample residues for at least one discrete preselected identification wavelength range within the range of 300 to 700 nanometers.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
219 words
A method for discriminating between a contaminated container and an uncontaminated container from a population of containers which were once filled with product to be consumed comprising the steps of: generating a signal representative of at least one physical response generated by a sample of product residue; generating at least one physical response from a sample residue in each container; comparing the physical response of the sample residue with the signal representative of the physical response of a product residue; and rejecting the container when the physical response of the sample residue does not correlate to the physical response of the product residue, whereby complex analytical systems for detecting a large number of unknown contaminants is avoided by reducing the analytical problem to the detection of known and relatively few products whose presence is used to indicate that the container was not contaminated; the steps of generating physical responses from product residue and sample residues comprising, directing electromagnetic energy to the residues from a light source, measuring the quality and quantity of electromagnetic energy that interacts with the residues, transmitting signals indicative of the quality and quantity of the electromagnetic energy measured, and collecting color information about the product and sample residues for at least one discrete preselected identification wavelength range within the range of 300 to 700 nanometers.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the color information from the physical responses of the product and sample residues is generated utilizing from three to eight discrete, preselected identification wavelength ranges.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the container rejected is in a product filling line.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
211 words
A method for discriminating between a contaminated container and an uncontaminated container from a population of containers which were once filled with product to be consumed comprising the steps of: generating a signal representative of at least one physical response generated by a sample of product residue; generating at least one physical response from a sample residue in each container; comparing the physical response of the sample residue with the signal representative of the physical response of the product; and rejecting the container when the physical response of the sample residue does not correlate to the physical response of the product residue, whereby complex analytical systems for detecting a large number of unknown contaminants is avoided by reducing the analytical problem to the detection of known and relatively few products whose presence is used to indicate that the container was not contaminated; the steps of generating physical responses from product and sample residues comprising, directing electromagnetic energy to the residues, measuring the quality and quantity of electromagnetic energy that interacts with the product and sample residues, transmitting signals indicative of the quality and quantity of the electromagnetic energy measured, and utilizing gas chromatography to measure the quality and quantity of the electromagnetic energy that interacts with the product and sample residues.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
211 words
A method for discriminating between a contaminated container and an uncontaminated container from a population of containers which were once filled with product to be consumed comprising the steps of: generating a signal representative of at least one physical response generated by a sample of product residue; generating at least one physical response from a sample residue in each container; comparing the physical response of the sample residue with the signal representative of the physical response of the product; and rejecting the container when the physical response of the sample residue does not correlate to the physical response of the product residue, whereby complex analytical systems for detecting a large number of unknown contaminants is avoided by reducing the analytical problem to the detection of known and relatively few products whose presence is used to indicate that the container was not contaminated; the steps of generating physical responses from product and sample residues comprising, directing electromagnetic energy to the residues, measuring the quality and quantity of electromagnetic energy that interacts with the product and sample residues, transmitting signals indicative of the quality and quantity of the electromagnetic energy measured, and utilizing gas chromatography to measure the quality and quantity of the electromagnetic energy that interacts with the product and sample residues.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the presence of a microorganism indicating the presence of product residue is utilized to indicate that the container was not contaminated.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 5 wherein a sample of a sample residue in a container is extracted from the container and the physical response of the sample residue is generated.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2735017A
Cited
US2593311A
Cited
US3266292A
Cited
US3417241A
Cited
US3802782A
Cited
US3712116A
Cited
US4055252A
Cited
US4227886A
Cited
US4121103A
Cited
JPS53133085A
Cited
JPS5536733A
Cited
DE2944434A1
Cited
DE3245908A1
Cited
US4551627A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-05-15 | 1992-11-14 | 1993-05-16 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-05-15 | 1996-11-14 | 1997-05-16 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-05-15 | 2000-11-14 | 2001-05-16 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |