US4827421A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Telecommunications satellite system on quasi-stationary orbits
Assignee: Airbus Defence and Space GmbH
•
Filing: 1987-03-11
•
Granted: 1989-05-02
•
Expires: 2007-03-11
Abstract
Abstract In a telecommunications satellite system operating with quasi-stationary orbits and comprising a plurality of earth satellites having elliptical orbits appearing at nearly the same location in space in cyclical succession and relieving one another in radio operation, a different range of the respective satellites to be engaged and disengaged from the ground stations is guaranteed. This enables an additional transit time for storage of data transmitted about the switching time from one satellite to another. To this end, the apogee of the orbital ellipse is shifted to such a degree from the Northern-most or, respectively, Southern-most orbital point against the direction of flight of the respective satellite that an adequate signal repetition of the bits to be transmitted occurs about the switching time. In a specific system comprising three satellites on elliptical orbits having an eccentricity of 0.713 and orbital times of 12 hours, a guaranteed radio spacing difference of one satellite relieving another of 75 km from ground stations occurs given a shift of the apogee from the Northern-most orbital point by 0.2° against the flight direction of the satellites. The lengthening of the propagation time therefore obtainable corresponds to a repetition of 1.024 bits given a rate of 2.048 Mbit/s.
Inventors
- 👤 Peter Dondl
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 14:48
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04B; H04B7/00; H04B7/14; H04B7/15; H04B7/185; H04B7/195
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
224 words
A method of operating a telecommunications satellite system having a plurality of satellites, said method comprising the steps of: respectively launching each of the said satellites in differently oriented quasi-stationary elliptical orbits around the earth, each satellite traveling in a flight direction in its orbit; successively engaging and disengaging said satellites by sending bit sequences in a propagation direction with at least one ground station, at a time at which a satellite to be disengaged is at substantially the same location in space with a satellite to be engaged; repeating a number of bits last sent to said satellite a number of bits last sent to said satellite to be disengaged as bits first sent to said satellite to be engaged; selecting at the time of launching an orbit for each satellite having an apogee shifted by a selected fixed angle opposite the flight direction for that satellite, relative to an orbital point of maximum latitude for that satellite, so that a selected distance exists between said satellites to be disengaged and engaged at said location in space, thereby lengthening the propagation time along said propagation direction for sending said bit sequences to a farther of said satellites to be disengaged and engaged; and selecting said fixed angle to lengthen said propagation time based on the selected number of said bits to be repeated.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
224 words
A method of operating a telecommunications satellite system having a plurality of satellites, said method comprising the steps of: respectively launching each of the said satellites in differently oriented quasi-stationary elliptical orbits around the earth, each satellite traveling in a flight direction in its orbit; successively engaging and disengaging said satellites by sending bit sequences in a propagation direction with at least one ground station, at a time at which a satellite to be disengaged is at substantially the same location in space with a satellite to be engaged; repeating a number of bits last sent to said satellite a number of bits last sent to said satellite to be disengaged as bits first sent to said satellite to be engaged; selecting at the time of launching an orbit for each satellite having an apogee shifted by a selected fixed angle opposite the flight direction for that satellite, relative to an orbital point of maximum latitude for that satellite, so that a selected distance exists between said satellites to be disengaged and engaged at said location in space, thereby lengthening the propagation time along said propagation direction for sending said bit sequences to a farther of said satellites to be disengaged and engaged; and selecting said fixed angle to lengthen said propagation time based on the selected number of said bits to be repeated.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
44 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of respectively launching each of said satellites is further defined by: respectively launching each of said satellites in respective elliptical orbits each having an eccentricity of 0.713 and an orbital time of 12 hours.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
81 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said orbits has an ascending node which is the point at which the orbit crosses the equatorial plane, and wherein the step of selecting said fixed angle is further defined by: selecting said fixed angle so that the apogee for an orbit is shifted relative to said point of maximum latitude by 0.2°, with an angle defined by said ascending node, the center of the earth, and said apogee being 89.8°.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
129 words
A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein each of said orbits has a maximum orbital tolerance, and wherein the step of selecting at the time of launching an orbit for each satellite having a apogee shifted by a selected fixed angle is further defined by: selecting at the time of launching an orbit for each satellite having an apogee selected by 0.2°, opposite the flight direction for that satellite, relative to the orbital point of maximum latitude for that satellite so that a distance of 75 km, relative to said ground station, exists between respective maximum orbital tolerances of said satellites to be disengaged and engaged at said location in space, thereby lengthening the propagation time along said propagation direction for sending said bit sequences by 0.5 ms.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
105 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of selecting at the time of launching and orbit for each satellite having an apogee shifting by a selected fixed angle is further defined by: selecting at the time of launching an orbit for each satellite having an apogee shifted by a selected fixed angle, opposite the flight direction for that satellite, relative to the northern most orbital point for that satellite, so that a selected distance exists between said satellites to be disengaged and engaged at said location in space, thereby lengthening the propagation time along said propagation direction for sending bit said sequences.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
105 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of selecting at the time of launching an orbit for each satellite having an apogee shifted by a selected fixed angle is further defined by: selecting at the time of launching an orbit for each satellite having an apogee shifted by a selected fixed angle, opposite the flight direction for that satellite, relative to a southern most orbital point for that satellite, so that a selected distance exists between said satellites to be disengaged and engaged at said location in space, thereby lengthening the propagation time along said propagation direction for sending said bit sequences.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-05-01 | 1992-10-31 | 1993-05-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-05-01 | 1996-10-31 | 1997-05-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-05-01 | 2000-10-31 | 2001-05-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |