Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
185 words
In a test system comprising a Fizeau spherical or plano wavefront interferometer, said interferometer comprising a source of light for providing a wavefront, a plano or spherical test surface, an optical element located in said wavefront and having a reference surface normal to said wavefront, said reference surface comprising a last surface with respect to the direction of said wavefront, said reference surface producing a reflected reference wavefront and a transmitted test wavefront which is directed at a common center of curvature of said reference surface and said plano or spherical test surface, said test wavefront interacting with said test surface and being returned from said test surface by reflection back through said reference surface, and means for interfering said reflected wavefront and reflected test wavefront for producing two beam interference fringes; the improvement comprising a partially reflective, partially absorbtive, partially transmissive beam splitting coating on said reference surface, said coating having a fixed reflectivity and transmittance such that there will be only two beam interference and the contrast of said two beam interference fringes is substantially equalized with respect to said test surface reflectivity.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
185 words
In a test system comprising a Fizeau spherical or plano wavefront interferometer, said interferometer comprising a source of light for providing a wavefront, a plano or spherical test surface, an optical element located in said wavefront and having a reference surface normal to said wavefront, said reference surface comprising a last surface with respect to the direction of said wavefront, said reference surface producing a reflected reference wavefront and a transmitted test wavefront which is directed at a common center of curvature of said reference surface and said plano or spherical test surface, said test wavefront interacting with said test surface and being returned from said test surface by reflection back through said reference surface, and means for interfering said reflected wavefront and reflected test wavefront for producing two beam interference fringes; the improvement comprising a partially reflective, partially absorbtive, partially transmissive beam splitting coating on said reference surface, said coating having a fixed reflectivity and transmittance such that there will be only two beam interference and the contrast of said two beam interference fringes is substantially equalized with respect to said test surface reflectivity.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said coating is such that said contrast is substantially equalized at the two extremes of said test surface reflectivity.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 2 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 3 wherein said system comprises means for testing a full reflectivity range of said plano or spherical test surface.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 4 wherein said full reflectivity range comprises from 4% to 100%.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 3 wherein said means for passing said light through said optical element comprises means for passing said light through said optical element as an expanded beam.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 6 wherein said transmitted test wavefront comprises a transmitted converging, diverging or plano test wavefront.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 7 wherein said reference surface is everywhere normal to said wavefront.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 8 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 3 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 11 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
33 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 10 wherein said means for passing said light through said optical element comprises means for passing said light through said optical element as an expanded beam.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 13 wherein said reference surface is everywhere normal to said wavefront.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said reference surface is everywhere normal to said wavefront.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 16 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said coating is a metallic or semi-metallic optical coating.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 18 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
45 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 13 wherein said contrast is represented by C and is defined in terms of said test surface and said reference surface reflectivity by the expression C=2T(R.sub.r R.sub.t).sup.1/2 /(R.sub.r +T.sup.2 R.sub.t) where R t is said test surface reflectivity.