← Back to Patent Explorer
US4820049A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Coating and method for testing plano and spherical wavefront producing optical surfaces and systems having a broad range of reflectivities

Assignee: Zygo Corp
•
Filing: 1987-10-16
•
Granted: 1989-04-11
•
Expires: 2007-10-16
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An improved system for testing a full reflectivity range of optical surfaces employs an improved Fizeau spherical or plano wavefront interferometer comprising a laser source (2) and an optical element (18) located in the wavefront (16) having a reference surface (20) everywhere normal to the wavefront (16) which has a partially reflective, partially absorbtive, and partially transmissive beamsplitting coating (19) applied to the plano or spherical reference surface (20) and having a transmittance such that there will be only two beam interference and the contrast of the two beam interference fringes between the reflected reference wavefront (25R) and the reflected test wavefront (25T) will be substantially equalized at the two extremes of the test surface (28) reflectivity.

Inventors

  • 👤 James F. Biegen

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-29 19:12
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01B; G01B9/00; G01B9/02; G01B9/02034; G01B9/02038; G01B9/02055; G01B9/02056; G01B9/02057; G01M; G01M11/00; G01M11/005; G01M11/02; G01M11/0242; G01M11/0271

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim 185 words
In a test system comprising a Fizeau spherical or plano wavefront interferometer, said interferometer comprising a source of light for providing a wavefront, a plano or spherical test surface, an optical element located in said wavefront and having a reference surface normal to said wavefront, said reference surface comprising a last surface with respect to the direction of said wavefront, said reference surface producing a reflected reference wavefront and a transmitted test wavefront which is directed at a common center of curvature of said reference surface and said plano or spherical test surface, said test wavefront interacting with said test surface and being returned from said test surface by reflection back through said reference surface, and means for interfering said reflected wavefront and reflected test wavefront for producing two beam interference fringes; the improvement comprising a partially reflective, partially absorbtive, partially transmissive beam splitting coating on said reference surface, said coating having a fixed reflectivity and transmittance such that there will be only two beam interference and the contrast of said two beam interference fringes is substantially equalized with respect to said test surface reflectivity.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 185 words
In a test system comprising a Fizeau spherical or plano wavefront interferometer, said interferometer comprising a source of light for providing a wavefront, a plano or spherical test surface, an optical element located in said wavefront and having a reference surface normal to said wavefront, said reference surface comprising a last surface with respect to the direction of said wavefront, said reference surface producing a reflected reference wavefront and a transmitted test wavefront which is directed at a common center of curvature of said reference surface and said plano or spherical test surface, said test wavefront interacting with said test surface and being returned from said test surface by reflection back through said reference surface, and means for interfering said reflected wavefront and reflected test wavefront for producing two beam interference fringes; the improvement comprising a partially reflective, partially absorbtive, partially transmissive beam splitting coating on said reference surface, said coating having a fixed reflectivity and transmittance such that there will be only two beam interference and the contrast of said two beam interference fringes is substantially equalized with respect to said test surface reflectivity.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 28 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said coating is such that said contrast is substantially equalized at the two extremes of said test surface reflectivity.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 2 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 26 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 3 wherein said system comprises means for testing a full reflectivity range of said plano or spherical test surface.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 4 wherein said full reflectivity range comprises from 4% to 100%.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 33 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 3 wherein said means for passing said light through said optical element comprises means for passing said light through said optical element as an expanded beam.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 22 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 6 wherein said transmitted test wavefront comprises a transmitted converging, diverging or plano test wavefront.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 7 wherein said reference surface is everywhere normal to said wavefront.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 8 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 3 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 11 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 48 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said coating has a transmittance T determined by T={R.sub.r /[R.sub.t(max) R.sub.t(min) ].sup.1/2 }.sup.1/2 where R r is said reference surface reflectivity and R t (max) and R t (min) are respectively, the maximum and minimum expected test surface reflectivity.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 33 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 10 wherein said means for passing said light through said optical element comprises means for passing said light through said optical element as an expanded beam.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 13 wherein said reference surface is everywhere normal to said wavefront.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said reference surface is everywhere normal to said wavefront.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 16 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 18 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 1 wherein said coating is a metallic or semi-metallic optical coating.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 16 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 18 wherein said source of light is a laser.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 45 words
An improved system in accordance with claim 13 wherein said contrast is represented by C and is defined in terms of said test surface and said reference surface reflectivity by the expression C=2T(R.sub.r R.sub.t).sup.1/2 /(R.sub.r +T.sup.2 R.sub.t) where R t is said test surface reflectivity.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3998553A Cited
US4201473A Cited
US4696572A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1992-04-10 1992-10-10 1993-04-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1996-04-10 1996-10-10 1997-04-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2000-04-10 2000-10-10 2001-04-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag