← Back to Patent Explorer
US4812819A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Functional relationship-based alarm processing system

Assignee: United States Department of Energy
•
Filing: 1988-04-22
•
Granted: 1989-03-14
•
Expires: 2008-04-22
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A functional relationship-based alarm processing system and method analyzes each alarm as it is activated and determines its relative importance with other currently activated alarms and signals in accordance with the functional relationships that the newly activated alarm has with other currently activated alarms. Once the initial level of importance of the alarm has been determined, that alarm is again evaluated if another related alarm is activated or deactivated. Thus, each alarm's importance is continuously updated as the state of the process changes during a scenario. Four hierarchical relationships are defined by this alarm filtering methodology: (1) level precursor (usually occurs when there are two alarm settings on the same parameter); (2) direct precursor (based on causal factors between two alarms); (3) required action (system response or action expected within a specified time following activation of an alarm or combination of alarms and process signals); and (4) blocking condition (alarms that are normally expected and are not considered important). The alarm processing system and method is sensitive to the dynamic nature of the process being monitored and is capable of changing the relative importance of each alarm as necessary.

Inventors

  • 👤 Daniel R. Corsberg

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 18:16
CPC Classifications
G; G08; G08B; G08B25/00; G08B25/14; G07; G07C; G07C3/00; G08B23/00; G05; G05B; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/20; G05B2219/24; G05B2219/24063; G05B2219/24086; G05B2219/24123

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 30
Claim 1
Independent Claim 314 words
A system for monitoring a process characterized by a plurality of process alarms A and B each representing a respective operating state of said process as of primary importance or of secondary importance based upon functional relationships among said alarms, said system comprising: a plurality of detectors each responsive to a respective process alarm; recording means coupled to said plurality of detectors for recording the occurrence of an alarm; and signal processing means coupled to said recording means and responsive to the occurrence of an alarm recorded therein for evaluating the operating state of the process and assigning an importance to its associated alarm by defining each of the alarms A and B in terms of one of the following relationship categories: alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B; alarm A is a direct precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B and alarm A's occurrence implies alarm B's occurrence; alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that occurrence of alarm B should cause the activation of alarm A; or alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B such that, with both alarms A and B activated, alarm B will not be processed until alarm A is no longer activated, or clears; and wherein primary importance is assigned to an activated alarm and secondary importance is assigned to that alarm which is not activated when one of the alarms is activated and the other alarm is not activated, and, where both alarm A and alarm B are activated, assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B or assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B for the remaining relationship categories between alarms A and B.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 314 words
A system for monitoring a process characterized by a plurality of process alarms A and B each representing a respective operating state of said process as of primary importance or of secondary importance based upon functional relationships among said alarms, said system comprising: a plurality of detectors each responsive to a respective process alarm; recording means coupled to said plurality of detectors for recording the occurrence of an alarm; and signal processing means coupled to said recording means and responsive to the occurrence of an alarm recorded therein for evaluating the operating state of the process and assigning an importance to its associated alarm by defining each of the alarms A and B in terms of one of the following relationship categories: alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B; alarm A is a direct precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B and alarm A's occurrence implies alarm B's occurrence; alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that occurrence of alarm B should cause the activation of alarm A; or alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B such that, with both alarms A and B activated, alarm B will not be processed until alarm A is no longer activated, or clears; and wherein primary importance is assigned to an activated alarm and secondary importance is assigned to that alarm which is not activated when one of the alarms is activated and the other alarm is not activated, and, where both alarm A and alarm B are activated, assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B or assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B for the remaining relationship categories between alarms A and B.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 25 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising display means coupled to said signal processing means for displaying the alarm designated as being of primary importance.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 59 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising mode switch means coupled to said signal processing means for displaying the alarm designated as being of primary importance in a first display mode and displaying the alarm designated as being of secondary importance in a second display mode, where said first display mode is more pronounced than said second display mode.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 47 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B and wherein only alarm B is activated, said system further comprising display means coupled to said signal processing means for providing an indication that alarm A is expected prior to alarm B.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 58 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B and an alarm C is a direct precursor to alarm B, wherein alarms A and B are activated and alarm C is not activated, with primary importance assigned by said signal processing means to alarm B and secondary importance assigned to alarm A.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 55 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B and an alarm C is a direct precursor to alarm B, wherein alarms A, B and C are activated, with primary importance assigned by said signal processing means to alarm C and secondary importance assigned to alarms A and B.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 67 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a predetermined time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is activated within said predetermined time interval, with said signal processing means assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 62 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is not activated within said predetermined time interval, with said signal processing means assigning primary importance to alarm B.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 28 words
The system of claim 8 further comprising means for providing an indication that alarm A was expected within said predetermined time interval of the activation of alarm B.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system of claim 9 wherein a highest level of importance is assigned to alarm A by said signal processing means.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 67 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is activated after said predetermined time interval, with said signal processing means assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 73 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarm A is inactive and alarm B is activated followed by de-activation of alarm B during said designated time interval, with said signal processing means maintaining alarms A and B with their respective current levels of importance.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 65 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is not activated within said designated time interval followed by de-activation of alarm B, with said signal processing means de-activating alarm A.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 75 words
The system of claim 1 wherein alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm A and re-activation of alarm A within said designated time interval, with said signal processing means assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 71 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm A and wherein alarm A is not re-activated within said designated time interval, with said signal processing means assigning primary importance to alarm B.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 28 words
The system of claim 15 further comprising means for providing an indication that alarm A was expected within said predetermined time interval of the activation of alarm B.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system of claim 16 wherein a highest level of importance is assigned to alarm A by said signal processing system.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 67 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is activated after said designated time interval, with said signal processing means assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 71 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm A is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm B, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm B and failure of alarm A to de-activate within said designated time interval, with said signal processing means assigning secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 69 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm B and de-activation of alarm A within said designated time interval, with said signal processing means assigning secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 50 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B and wherein alarm A is activated and alarm B is not activated, with said signal processing means assigning a level of importance to alarm A in accordance with its relationship categories to other activated alarms.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 12 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising means for displaying alarm A.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 50 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B and wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is not activated, with said signal processing means assigning a level of importance to alarm B in accordance with its relationship categories to other activated alarms.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 42 words
The system of claim 1 where alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B and wherein alarms A and B are both activated, with said signal processing means blocking alarm B and allowing the priority of alarm A to remain unchanged.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 25 words
The system of claim 24 further comprising display means for displaying alarm A in an unchanged manner and for preventing the display of alarm B.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 17 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said recording means includes at least one programmable sequential events recorder.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 15 words
The system of claim 26 wherein said signal processing means includes at least one computer.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 52 words
The system of claim 27 wherein said recording means includes first and second programmable sequential events recorders and said signal processing means includes first and second computers, wherein said first programmable sequential events recorder is coupled to said first computer and said second sequential events recorder is coupled to said second computer.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 24 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising a plurality of display workstations coupled to said signal processing means for providing a visual alarm display.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4015237A Cited
US4401971A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1992-03-13 1992-09-12 1993-03-14 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1996-03-13 1996-09-12 1997-03-14 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2000-03-13 2000-09-12 2001-03-14 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag