← Back to Patent Explorer
US4809194A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Image processing system and method using modulated detector outputs

Assignee: Raytheon Co
•
Filing: 1986-08-28
•
Granted: 1989-02-28
•
Expires: 2006-08-28
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An image processing system 10 includes an array (12) of detectors 14, each of which is designed to produce a current proportional to incident radiation. This system provides image processing at a viable sampling rate even for very large arrays and permits very efficient determination of single element detections. The modulation functions supplied from a weighted summer (18). The weighted summer applies an invertible matrix of weights to a series of orthonormal Walsh functions defined over a predetermined sampling interval, the Walsh functions being generated by a function generator (16). The modulated outputs of the array are combined by a summer (20) and distributed among parallel channels by a divider (22). Correlators (24) correlate the signal in each channel with a respective one of the original Walsh functions. The correlated outputs are digitized by analog-to-digital converters for transmission and processing by a digital processor (28). The processor can at least partially reconstruct the detected spatial distribution for output to a display (30).

Inventors

  • 👤 Rex J. Crookshanks

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-04 15:36
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06E; G06E3/00; G06E3/001; G06E3/005

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 62
Claim 1
Independent Claim 67 words
A signal detection and processing system comprising: an array of detectors, each detector being adapted for providing an output representing the value of a variable of interest incident the detector; modulation means for modulating the output of each said detector by a respective plurality of time-varying functions which are mutually orthogonal over a predetermined time interval; and summing means for summing the modulated outputs of said detectors.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 67 words
A signal detection and processing system comprising: an array of detectors, each detector being adapted for providing an output representing the value of a variable of interest incident the detector; modulation means for modulating the output of each said detector by a respective plurality of time-varying functions which are mutually orthogonal over a predetermined time interval; and summing means for summing the modulated outputs of said detectors.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 74 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising correlator means for correlating the output of said summing means with respective ones of said time-varying functions, sampling means for sampling the output of said correlator means over an interval over which said time-varying functions are orthogonal, said sampling means including a signal processor for processing the output of said correlator means for providing information on the spatial distribution of said variable of interest incident said array.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 12 words
The system of claim 2 wherein said time-varying functions are mutually orthonormal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 32 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the modulation means modulates the output of each said detector by a respective weighted set of the respective plurality of time-varying functions associated with said detector.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 33 words
The system of claim 4 wherein the number of said time-varying functions is equal to the number of detectors, and wherein the weights applied in summing said time-varying function constitute an invertible matrix.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 38 words
The system of claim 5 where the rows of said invertible matrix correspond to the weightings applied to respective ones of said detectors and the columns of said invertible matrix correspond to respective ones of said time-varying functions.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 23 words
The system of claim 6 wherein said signal processor determines when a change in intensity is detected by any detector in said array.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 40 words
The system of claim 7 wherein said signal processor determines from the output of said sampling means which detector of said array has detected a change in said variable of interest when only one detector has detected such a change.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 31 words
The system of claim 7 wherein said signal processor determines which of said detectors has detected a change in said variable of interest when plural detectors have detected such a change.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 34 words
The system of claim 3 wherein said array is rectangular and the number of time-varying functions is equal to the number of rows of the array plus the number of columns in said array.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 62 words
The system of claim 10 wherein the modulation means modulates the output of each said detector by a respective weighted sum of the respective plurality of time-varying functions associated with said detector, and the weights applied to said time-varying functions constitute an invertible matrix with the number of elements in the matrix equalling the square of the number of said time-varying functions.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 22 words
The system of claim 11 wherein said processor determines when a change in intensity is detected by any detector in the array.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 34 words
The system of claim 12 wherein said processor determines which detector of said array has detected a change in intensity when only one of said detectors detects such a change in a sampling interval.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 55 words
The system of claim 13 further comprising means for generating said time-varying functions, and means for communicating between the means for generating and the processor, and wherein the processor turns off selected ones of said time-varying functions to resolve ambiguities through examination of multiple samples when plural detectors detect changes in said variable of interest.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 34 words
The system of claim 2 wherein said correlating means includes correlators configured in parallel, each correlator being arranged to correlate the output of said summing means with a respective one of said time-varying functions.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 29 words
The system of claim 15 wherein said sampling means includes analog-to-digital converters, with each converter being in communication with a respective one of said correlators and said signal processor.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 15 words
The system of claim 3 wherein said modulation means generates a set of Walsh functions.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 10 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said detectors are photodiodes.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 20 words
The system of claim 18 wherein said modulation means includes means for varying the bias across each of said photodiodes.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 69 words
The system of claim 2 wherein the correlator means includes a plurality of correlators arranged in parallel and each of the correlators has an output, and the sampling means includes a plurality of analog-to-digital convertors arranged in parallel between the correlators, each of the analog-to-digital converters having an input connected to a respective one of the outputs of the correlators, and having an output connected to the signal processor.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 62 words
The system of claim 20 further comprising: means for generating said time-varying functions, said means including a plurality of outputs upon which signals corresponding to said time-varying functions are placed, and wherein the outputs of the means for generating are connected to respective ones of the correlators so that respective correlators receive respective ones of the signals corresponding to said time-varying functions.
Claim 23
Independent Claim 56 words
A method of image processing comprising: detecting a scene with an array of detectors, each detector being adapted for providing an output representing the intensity of radiation incident that detector; modulating the output of each detector by a plurality of weighted time-varying functions that are orthogonal over a predetermined time interval; and summing the modulated outputs.
Claim 24
Independent Claim 56 words
A method of image processing comprising: detecting a scene with an array of detectors, each detector being adapted for providing an output representing the intensity of radiation incident that detector; modulating the output of each detector by a plurality of weighted time-varying functions that are orthogonal over a predetermined time interval; and summing the modulated outputs.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 50 words
The method of claim 22 further comprising: correlating the summed signal with respective ones of said time-varying functions; sampling each correlated signal over a time interval over which said time-varying functions are orthogonal; and processing the samples to obtain information regarding the spatial distribution of radiation incident said detector array.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 11 words
The method of claim 23 wherein said time-varying functions are orthonormal.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 24 wherein said time-varying functions are Walsh functions.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 23 wherein the weights applied in summing said time-varying functions constitute an invertible matrix.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 26 wherein the weights applied in summing said time-varying functions are the coefficients of quantized Legendre polynomials.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 23 wherein the number of time varying functions equals the number of detectors.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 28 wherein said samples are processed to determine the intensity of radiation incident each of said detectors.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method of claim 23 wherein said array is rectangular and the number of time-varying functions is the sum of the number of rows of said array and the number of columns of said array.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 30 further comprising the steps of determining when multiple detectors detect a change in intensity, and in the event of such a multiple detection, shutting off selected time-varying functions so that detector determination ambiguities can be resolved successive sampling periods.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method of claim 23 wherein said samples are processed to determine when a change in detected intensity has occurred and to identify the detector detecting the change when only one detector has detected such a change.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 22 wherein the modulation is applied by varying the bias across each of said detectors.
Claim 36
Independent Claim 113 words
A method of processing data from a predetermined number of detectors, said method comprising the steps of: modulating the output of each detector by a plurality of weighted time functions which are mutually orthonormal over a predetermined time interval, the number of said time functions equaling at least the number of said detectors, the weighting factors taken over each time function and each detector defining an invertible matrix; summing the modulated outputs; dividing the summed signal so formed into parallel channels; correlating the summed signal in each said parallel channel with a respective one of said time functions; and sampling the correlated signal over a time over which said time functions are orthonormal.
Claim 37
Independent Claim 113 words
A method of processing data from a predetermined number of detectors, said method comprising the steps of: modulating the output of each detector by a plurality of weighted time functions which are mutually orthonormal over a predetermined time interval, the number of said time functions equaling at least the number of said detectors, the weighting factors taken over each time function and each detector defining an invertible matrix; summing the modulated outputs; dividing the summed signal so formed into parallel channels; correlating the summed signal in each said parallel channel with a respective one of said time functions; and sampling the correlated signal over a time over which said time functions are orthonormal.
Claim 38
Independent Claim 71 words
A method of recoverably multiplexing data output from a predetermined number of detectors for a variable of interest, said method comprising the steps of: calibrating each of said detectors to minimize response non-linearities; selecting a time interval which is small relative to the frequency of changes in said variable of interest; forming a vector, the elements of which define a set of time functions that are orthonormal over said time interval;
Claim 39
Independent Claim 71 words
A method of recoverably multiplexing data output from a predetermined number of detectors for a variable of interest, said method comprising the steps of: calibrating each of said detectors to minimize response non-linearities; selecting a time interval which is small relative to the frequency of changes in said variable of interest; forming a vector, the elements of which define a set of time functions that are orthonormal over said time interval;
Claim 40
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 35 wherein said modulation functions are applied to the detector outputs after event detection.
Claim 41
Independent Claim 158 words
A method of processing image data output from an array of radiation intensity detectors, said method comprising the steps of: applying a set of modulation functions to modulate the output of said array, said set of modulation functions being mutually orthogonal over a predetermined time period; summing the modulated outputs; splitting the summed signal into parallel channels; correlating the summed signal in each of said parallel channels with a respective of said functions; and processing the correlated signals to obtain intensity distribution data. forming an invertible matrix of scalers; multiplying said vector and said matrix to form a modulation matrix, each element of said modulation matrix being the product of the respective element of said scaler matrix and a time function corresponding to the column position of the element of said modulation matrix; modulating the output of each detector by the sum of the elements of a respective row of said modulation matrix; and summing the modulated outputs.
Claim 42
Independent Claim 158 words
A method of processing image data output from an array of radiation intensity detectors, said method comprising the steps of: applying a set of modulation functions to modulate the output of said array, said set of modulation functions being mutually orthogonal over a predetermined time period; summing the modulated outputs; splitting the summed signal into parallel channels; correlating the summed signal in each of said parallel channels with a respective of said functions; and processing the correlated signals to obtain intensity distribution data. forming an invertible matrix of scalers; multiplying said vector and said matrix to form a modulation matrix, each element of said modulation matrix being the product of the respective element of said scaler matrix and a time function corresponding to the column position of the element of said modulation matrix; modulating the output of each detector by the sum of the elements of a respective row of said modulation matrix; and summing the modulated outputs.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim 107 words
In a system for detecting at least one variable of interest incident upon an array of detectors, a method of processing electromagnetic signals from an array of detectors arranged in rows and columns, the method comprising the steps of: modulating the output of each detector of said array according to a composite modulation function so that the output is the sum of a row modulation function and a column modulation function, each row modulation function and each column modulation function being a plurality of weighted time functions which are mutually orthogonal over a predetermined time interval, the weight defining an invertible matrix; and summing the modulated outputs.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim 107 words
In a system for detecting at least one variable of interest incident upon an array of detectors, a method of processing electromagnetic signals from an array of detectors arranged in rows and columns, the method comprising the steps of: modulating the output of each detector of said array according to a composite modulation function so that the output is the sum of a row modulation function and a column modulation function, each row modulation function and each column modulation function being a plurality of weighted time functions which are mutually orthogonal over a predetermined time interval, the weight defining an invertible matrix; and summing the modulated outputs.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method of claim 38 further comprising the steps of: after summing, transmitting said summed signal in parallel along plural channels; and correlating the summed signal in each channel by a respective one of said time functions.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 39 further comprising the step of sampling the correlated signals over a time interval over which said time functions are orthonormal.
Claim 47
Independent Claim 92 words
A system for analyzing the spatial distribution of a variable referable to an event of interest comprising: a number of detectors, each adapted for providing an output as a function of said variable; modulation means for modulating the output of each said detector in response to a respective modulation function; function generators for providing modulation functions to said modulation means, said function generators being adapted for providing set of modulation functions each of which is a weighted set of orthogonal time functions; and summing means for summing modulated outputs from said detectors.
Claim 48
Independent Claim 92 words
A system for analyzing the spatial distribution of a variable referable to an event of interest comprising: a number of detectors, each adapted for providing an output as a function of said variable; modulation means for modulating the output of each said detector in response to a respective modulation function; function generators for providing modulation functions to said modulation means, said function generators being adapted for providing set of modulation functions each of which is a weighted set of orthogonal time functions; and summing means for summing modulated outputs from said detectors.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim 38 words
The system of claim 41 further comprising: means for transmitting the output of said summing means along parallel channels; and correlating means for correlating the summed signal of each parallel channel with a respective of said orthogonal functions.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim 32 words
The system of claim 42 further comprising processing means for processing the outputs of said correlator means so as to at least partially reconstruct the spatial distribution of the variable of interest.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim 30 words
The system of claim 43 wherein said processing means includes sampling means for sampling the outputs of said correlating means over an interval over which said time functions are orthogonal.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim 27 words
The system of claim 41 further characterized in that said modulation means applies modulation to the output of said detectors after detection of the variable of interest.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim 44 words
The system of claim 41 further characterized in that said function generators generate one function for each detector so that the spatial distribution of said variable of interest is completely recoverable from the summed output signal with the information from a single sampling interval.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim 27 words
The system of claim 46 further comprising means for processing said correlator outputs so that the address of a single detector detecting an event can be determined.
Claim 55
Dependent Claim 32 words
The system of claim 47 further characterized in that the means for processing alters selected modulation functions so that ambiguities introduced by events exciting multiple detectors can be resolved by successive samplings.
Claim 56
Dependent Claim 65 words
The system of claim 41 further characterized in that said detectors are arranged in a rectangular array, and in that said modulation means applies to each detector a modulation function that is the sum of a respective row function and a respective column function, each row function and each column function being the weighted sum of time functions which are orthogonal over predetermined time interval.
Claim 57
Dependent Claim 25 words
The system of claim 49 further characterized in that said function generators provide a modulation function for each row and each column of said array.
Claim 58
Dependent Claim 26 words
The system of claim 41 further characterized in that said function generators are adapted for generating modulation functions in the form of weighted orthonormal time functions.
Claim 59
Dependent Claim 13 words
The system of claim 41 further characterized in that said detectors are photodiodes.
Claim 60
Dependent Claim 25 words
The system of claim 52 further characterized in that said modulation means modulates the output of said photodiodes by varying the biases across the photodiodes.
Claim 61
Dependent Claim 33 words
The system of claim 41 further characterized in that said processing means processes said correlated signals so that the row and column of a single excited detector or said array can be determined.
Claim 62
Dependent Claim 35 words
The system of claim 54 further characterized in that said processing means selectively disables predetermined modulation functions so that in the event of the excitation of multiple detectors, ambiguities can be resolved by successive samplings.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3775602A Cited
US4009380A Cited
US4590608A Cited
US4365310A Cited
US4542367A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1992-02-28 1992-08-29 1993-02-28 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1996-02-28 1996-08-29 1997-02-28 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2000-02-28 2000-08-29 2001-02-28 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag