Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
390 words
A low flight method for automatic course determination when approaching a given target site, comprising the steps of: storing digitally, in a terrain memory, terrain points in a grid type distribution and also storing height coordinates associated with the terrain points to form a digital terrain height model; forming, by means of a rough analyzer, at first time intervals ΔT over the multitude of points of the digital terrain height model, a first fan (F n ) starting from a respective momentary flight position (P 1 ) and oriented with a center direction (M F ) toward the target site (P 2 ) and comprising a plurality of adjacent fan segments (S i ), calculating for each fan segment (S i ) a mean value of the height coordinates of the terrain points situated in the fan segment, and determining the fan segment having the smallest mean value; forming, by means of a fine analyzer, within each of the first time intervals ΔT in multiple spaced succession of comparatively shorter second time intervals Δt over the multitude of points of the digital terrain height model, a second fan (f m ) of smaller radius by comparison with the first fan (F n ) starting from the momentary flight position (P 1 , P 2 , etc.) and oriented with its center direction (M fm ) into the momentary flight direction and comprising a plurality of adjacent smaller fan segments (s j ), and calculating for each smaller fan segment (s j ) a mean value of the height coordinates of the terrain points situated in the respective smaller fan segments; determining, by means of a flight path finder, the respective differences of said mean values of the smaller fan segments and comparing the differences in each instance with a predetermined limit value (G); forming, if none of the respective mean values exceeds the limit value (G), a course correction command for approximating the flight direction which corresponds to the fan segment previously determined in the rough analyzer to have the smallest mean value; and forming, if at least one of the respective mean values of the smaller fan segments exceeds the limit value (G), a course correction command for the momentary flight course according to the respective smaller fan segment (s j ) the lowest mean value is present in.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
390 words
A low flight method for automatic course determination when approaching a given target site, comprising the steps of: storing digitally, in a terrain memory, terrain points in a grid type distribution and also storing height coordinates associated with the terrain points to form a digital terrain height model; forming, by means of a rough analyzer, at first time intervals ΔT over the multitude of points of the digital terrain height model, a first fan (F n ) starting from a respective momentary flight position (P 1 ) and oriented with a center direction (M F ) toward the target site (P 2 ) and comprising a plurality of adjacent fan segments (S i ), calculating for each fan segment (S i ) a mean value of the height coordinates of the terrain points situated in the fan segment, and determining the fan segment having the smallest mean value; forming, by means of a fine analyzer, within each of the first time intervals ΔT in multiple spaced succession of comparatively shorter second time intervals Δt over the multitude of points of the digital terrain height model, a second fan (f m ) of smaller radius by comparison with the first fan (F n ) starting from the momentary flight position (P 1 , P 2 , etc.) and oriented with its center direction (M fm ) into the momentary flight direction and comprising a plurality of adjacent smaller fan segments (s j ), and calculating for each smaller fan segment (s j ) a mean value of the height coordinates of the terrain points situated in the respective smaller fan segments; determining, by means of a flight path finder, the respective differences of said mean values of the smaller fan segments and comparing the differences in each instance with a predetermined limit value (G); forming, if none of the respective mean values exceeds the limit value (G), a course correction command for approximating the flight direction which corresponds to the fan segment previously determined in the rough analyzer to have the smallest mean value; and forming, if at least one of the respective mean values of the smaller fan segments exceeds the limit value (G), a course correction command for the momentary flight course according to the respective smaller fan segment (s j ) the lowest mean value is present in.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
22 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1, wherein the number of smaller fan S j in the second fan comprises three.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
38 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of forming the arithmetic mean for the segments (S i , S j ) of the first and/or second fans (F n , f m ).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
42 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of forming a mean more strongly weighting greater heights for the segments (S i , S j ) of the first and/or second fans (F n , f m ).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
The low flight method recited in claim 4 wherein the mean comprises a geometric mean.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1, wherein, in addition to the mean values, the standard deviations present within the respective segments (Si, S j ) are taken into consideration.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
29 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1 wherein the first and second time intervals (ΔT, Δt) are shortened with increasing approach to the target site (P z ).
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1, wherein the first and second time intervals (ΔT, Δt) are shortened with increasing flight velocity.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
30 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1, wherein the radii of the first and second fans (F n , f m ) are enlarged with increasing flight velocity (v).
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
21 words
The low flight method recited in claim 1, wherein the limit value (G) is increased with increasing unevenness of the terrain.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method recited in claim 1, wherein the first time intervals ΔT are variable.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of storing in the terrain memory, in the presence of an enemy antiaircraft position int he terrain to be flown over, supplementary information quantizing the type and range of the antiaircraft position for the terrain points lying in the vicinity of that position.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 12, wherein the height coordinates of the terrain points lying in the vicinity of the antiaircraft position are additively increased or provided with a multiplier.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 13, wherein the amounts of be added to the height coordinates or the multipliers decrease with increasing distance form the menace position.