US4779237A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of geophysical exploration including processing and displaying seismic data to obtain a measure of subterranean formation rock properties
Assignee: STADARD OIL Co (INDIANA) A CORP OF
•
Filing: 1984-08-27
•
Granted: 1988-10-18
•
Expires: 2004-08-27
Abstract
Abstract The present invention provides a method of seismic exploration for obtaining a measure of the subterranean formation rock properties. Incident angle ordered gathers of seismic signal are processed to obtain a measure of the reflection coefficient as well as attributes descriptive of variations in amplitude of the seismic signal as a function of incident angle. Such attributes, when plotted on an angle dependent amplitude diagram, are transformed into a most probable estimate of the subterranean formation rock properties as well as a diagnostic of relative lithology and pore fluid contrast.
Inventors
- 👤 John H. Bodine
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 05:02
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/30; G01V1/306; G01V2210/00; G01V2210/60; G01V2210/63; G01V2210/632
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 32
Claim 1
Independent Claim
122 words
A method of geophysical exploration for processing seismic data, including the steps of: (a) fitting seismic signal amplitude variations, as a function of incident angle for selected seismic events to: R.sub.c '(θ)=B.sub.0 'B.sub.1 ' tan .sup.2 θ+B.sub.2 ' sin.sup.2 θ tan .sup.2 θ where R c '(θ) is a first reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; θ is the incident angle; and obtaining a first set of attributes B 0 ', B 1 ' and B 2 ' descriptive of the seismic signal amplitude variation; and (b) mapping the first set of attributes onto an angle-dependent amplitude diagram and transforming the first set of attributes into a measure of the subterranean formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
122 words
A method of geophysical exploration for processing seismic data, including the steps of: (a) fitting seismic signal amplitude variations, as a function of incident angle for selected seismic events to: R.sub.c '(θ)=B.sub.0 'B.sub.1 ' tan .sup.2 θ+B.sub.2 ' sin.sup.2 θ tan .sup.2 θ where R c '(θ) is a first reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; θ is the incident angle; and obtaining a first set of attributes B 0 ', B 1 ' and B 2 ' descriptive of the seismic signal amplitude variation; and (b) mapping the first set of attributes onto an angle-dependent amplitude diagram and transforming the first set of attributes into a measure of the subterranean formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 3
Independent Claim
112 words
A method of geophysical exploration for processing seismic data, including the steps of: (a) fitting seismic signal amplitude, as a function of incident angle for selected seismic events, to: R.sub.c '(θ)=B.sub.0 '+B.sub.1 tan .sup.2 θ where R c ' (θ) is the first reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; θ is the incident angle; and obtaining a first set of attributes B 0 ' and B 1 ' descriptive of the seismic signal amplitude variation; and (b) mapping the first set of attributes onto an angle-dependent amplitude diagram and transforming the first set of attributes into a measure of the subterranean formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
112 words
A method of geophysical exploration for processing seismic data, including the steps of: (a) fitting seismic signal amplitude, as a function of incident angle for selected seismic events, to: R.sub.c '(θ)=B.sub.0 '+B.sub.1 tan .sup.2 θ where R c ' (θ) is the first reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; θ is the incident angle; and obtaining a first set of attributes B 0 ' and B 1 ' descriptive of the seismic signal amplitude variation; and (b) mapping the first set of attributes onto an angle-dependent amplitude diagram and transforming the first set of attributes into a measure of the subterranean formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
97 words
A method of geophysical exploration for processing seismic data, including the steps of: (a) statistically fitting seismic signal amplitude variations, as a function of incident angle, for selected seismic events to a parametric equation relating contrasts in formation rock properties to seismic signal amplitude variations, as a function of incident angle, and obtaining a set of attributes descriptive of such amplitude variations; and (b) mapping the set of attributes onto an angle-dependent amplitude diagram and transforming the set of attributes into a measure of the contrast in subterranean formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
97 words
A method of geophysical exploration for processing seismic data, including the steps of: (a) statistically fitting seismic signal amplitude variations, as a function of incident angle, for selected seismic events to a parametric equation relating contrasts in formation rock properties to seismic signal amplitude variations, as a function of incident angle, and obtaining a set of attributes descriptive of such amplitude variations; and (b) mapping the set of attributes onto an angle-dependent amplitude diagram and transforming the set of attributes into a measure of the contrast in subterranean formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the angle-dependent amplitude diagram comprises: a lithology diagram having axes of selected formation rock properties for relating contrasts in formation lithology to contrast in formation rock property; and contour lines representative of assumed contrasts and formation rock properties across subterranean formation interfaces mapped onto the lithology diagram.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 4 wherein: only the zero values of the contour lines representative of an assumed contrast in formation rock properties across subterranean formation interfaces are mapped onto the lithology diagram.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
102 words
A method of geophysical exploration for displaying and interpreting seismic data including the steps of: (a) preparing a lithology diagram having axes of selected formation rock properties for relating contrasts in formation lithology to contrasts in formation rock properties; (b) plotting contour lines on the lithology diagram representative of contrasts in assumed formation rock properties across a subterranean formation interface; and (c) mapping a first set of attributes on the lithology diagram wherein the attributes are descriptive of variations in amplitude of a seismic signal, as a function of incident angle, for a selected seismic event associated with the subterranean formation interface.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
102 words
A method of geophysical exploration for displaying and interpreting seismic data including the steps of: (a) preparing a lithology diagram having axes of selected formation rock properties for relating contrasts in formation lithology to contrasts in formation rock properties; (b) plotting contour lines on the lithology diagram representative of contrasts in assumed formation rock properties across a subterranean formation interface; and (c) mapping a first set of attributes on the lithology diagram wherein the attributes are descriptive of variations in amplitude of a seismic signal, as a function of incident angle, for a selected seismic event associated with the subterranean formation interface.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 6 wherein step (a) includes: selecting formation rock properties from the group comprising Poisson's ratio, compressional velocity, shear velocity, the ratio of the compressional velocity to shear velocity and density.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
84 words
The method of claim 6 wherein step (b) includes: plotting contour lines of a second set of attributes obtained from an optimized statistical fit of an exact reflection coefficient for the assumed contrast in formation rock properties according to: R.sub.c (θ)=B.sub.0 +B.sub.1 tan.sup.2 θ+B.sub.2 sin.sup.2 θ tan.sup.2 θ where R c (θ) is the reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; θ is the incident angle; and B 0 , B 1 and B 2 comprise attributes of the second set of attributes.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the maximum incident angle θ is less than 35° and R c (θ)=B 0 +B 1
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
77 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the step (c) includes: obtaining the first set of attributes by performing an optimized statistical fit of the variations in the amplitude seismic signal according to R.sub.c (θ)=B.sub.0 +B.sub.1 tan.sup.2 θ+B.sub.2 sin.sup.2 θ tan.sup.2 θ where R c (θ) is the reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; θ is the incident angle; and B 0 , B 1 and B 2 comprise attributes of the first set of attributes.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the maximum incident angle is less than 35° and R c (θ)=B 0 +B 1 tan 2 θ.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
144 words
A method of geophysical exploration for obtaining a measure of subterranean formation rock properties including the steps of: obtaining a set of observed attributes descriptive of seismic signal amplitude variations as a function of incident angle for seismic events in the seismic signals; obtaining a set of theoretical attributes descriptive of a plurality of contrasts in assumed formation rock properties across a subterranean formation interface associated with the selected seismic event; plotting a plurality of theoretical attribute contour lines on a lithology diagram having axes of selected formation rock properties for relating contrasts in formation lithology to contrasts in formation rock properties; scaling the observed set of attributes to units of reflection coefficient; and plotting the scaled observed attributes onto the contour lines of the theoretical set of attributes to obtain a measure of the underlying formation rock properties associated with the seismic event.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
144 words
A method of geophysical exploration for obtaining a measure of subterranean formation rock properties including the steps of: obtaining a set of observed attributes descriptive of seismic signal amplitude variations as a function of incident angle for seismic events in the seismic signals; obtaining a set of theoretical attributes descriptive of a plurality of contrasts in assumed formation rock properties across a subterranean formation interface associated with the selected seismic event; plotting a plurality of theoretical attribute contour lines on a lithology diagram having axes of selected formation rock properties for relating contrasts in formation lithology to contrasts in formation rock properties; scaling the observed set of attributes to units of reflection coefficient; and plotting the scaled observed attributes onto the contour lines of the theoretical set of attributes to obtain a measure of the underlying formation rock properties associated with the seismic event.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 12 wherein: only the zero values of the theoretical attribute contour lines are plotted on the lithology diagram.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 13 wherein: the zero values of the theoretical attributes subdivide the lithology diagram into quadrants, selected quadrants being correlated to gas bearing formations.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 14 wherein: the quadrants in which the scaled observed attributes having the same sign correlate with gas bearing formations.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 14 wherein: locating the quadrant for the observed attributes according to: B.sub.L =arc tan (B.sub.1 /B.sub.0) where B 0 and B 1 comprise the observed attributes.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
176 words
A method of geophysical exploration for interpreting seismic data, including the steps of: (a) obtaining a first set of attributes descriptive of seismic signal amplitude variations as a function of incident angle for selected seismic events in incident angle ordered gathers of seismic signals; (b) assuming a set of formation rock properties for an overlying formation associated with each selected seismic event; (c) assuming any other set of formation rock properties for an underlying formation associated with each selected seismic event; (d) wherein the assumed formation rock properties define a plurality of assumed contrasts in the formation rock properties across the subterranean formation interface associated with each selected seismic event; (e) obtaining second sets of attributes from the plurality of assumed contrasts in formation rock properties for each selected seismic event; (f) mapping contour lines of the second sets of attributes onto a lithology diagram; and (g) plotting the first set of attributes onto the respective contour lines of the second set of attributes to obtain a more probable estimate of the underlying formation rock properties.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
176 words
A method of geophysical exploration for interpreting seismic data, including the steps of: (a) obtaining a first set of attributes descriptive of seismic signal amplitude variations as a function of incident angle for selected seismic events in incident angle ordered gathers of seismic signals; (b) assuming a set of formation rock properties for an overlying formation associated with each selected seismic event; (c) assuming any other set of formation rock properties for an underlying formation associated with each selected seismic event; (d) wherein the assumed formation rock properties define a plurality of assumed contrasts in the formation rock properties across the subterranean formation interface associated with each selected seismic event; (e) obtaining second sets of attributes from the plurality of assumed contrasts in formation rock properties for each selected seismic event; (f) mapping contour lines of the second sets of attributes onto a lithology diagram; and (g) plotting the first set of attributes onto the respective contour lines of the second set of attributes to obtain a more probable estimate of the underlying formation rock properties.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 1 or 2 wherein the angle dependent amplitude diagram: comprises: a lithology diagram relating relative changes in formation rock properties to relative changes in formation lithology; and contour lines mapped on the lithology diagram representative of an assumed contrast in formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 18 wherein: the contour lines are representative of a second reflection coefficient for the assumed contrast in formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 18 wherein: the contour lines are representative of a second set of attributes descriptive of the assumed contrast in formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
81 words
The method of claim 20 wherein: the contour lines are representative of an optimized statistical fit to an exact reflection coefficient obtained from the assumed contrast in formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event according to: R.sub.c (θ)=B.sub.0 +B.sub.1 tan.sup.2 θ+B.sub.2 sin.sup.2 θ tan.sup.2 θ where R c (θ) is the second reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; is the incident angle; and B 0 , B 1 and B 2 comprise the second set of attributes.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
75 words
The method of claim 20 wherein the contour lines are representative of an optimized statistical fit to an exact reflection coefficient obtained from the assumed contrast in formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event according to: R.sub.c (θ)=B.sub.0 +B.sub.1 tan.sup.2 θ where R c (θ) is the second reflection coefficient as a function of incident angle; θ is the incident angle; and B 0 , B 1 comprise the second set of attributes.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 22 wherein the maximum incident angle θ is less than 35°.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 1 or 2 further including the step of: determining the most probable estimate of the formation rock properties associated with the selected seismic event, wherein the formation rock properties are selected from the group of shear wave velocity, compressional wave velocity and density.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 17 further including the step of: developing an angle dependent amplitude diagram from a plurality of assumed contrasts in the formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 25 further including the step of: mapping the first set of attributes on the angle dependent diagram to determine a most probable estimate of the underlying formation rock properties associated with each selected seismic event.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4136754A
Cited
US4170002A
Cited
US4437176A
Cited
US4415999A
Cited
US4534019A
Cited
US4573148A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-10-18 | 1992-04-18 | 1992-10-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-10-18 | 1996-04-18 | 1996-10-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-10-18 | 2000-04-18 | 2000-10-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |