← Back to Patent Explorer
US4775912A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Protection device against the driving effect of parasitic transistors in monolithic integrated circuits

Assignee: STMicroelectronics SRL
•
Filing: 1986-10-07
•
Granted: 1988-10-04
•
Expires: 2006-10-07
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Described is a protection device for power PNP transistors against the anomalous driving effect of parasitic transistors which are excited, under certain limit conditions, in bipolar type monolithic integrated circuits. The device is of simple integration and requires essentially the use of a PNP protection transistor connected with its emitter and collector respectively to the emitter or to a node at a higher potential than the latter and to the base of the PNP transistor to be protected and physically made on the chip in a position essentially adjacent to the PNP transistor to be protected.

Inventors

  • 👤 Pietro Menniti
  • 👤 Angelo Alzati

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-29 09:00
CPC Classifications
H; H10; H10D; H10D89/00; H10D89/60

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim 138 words
A protection device against the driving effect of a parasitic transistor upon an adjacent PNP transistor in the layout of a bipolar type monolithic integrated circuit comprising a protection PNP transistor having an emitter, a base and a collector, the collector being connected to a base of said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected, the emitter being connected to a circuit node at a voltage equal to or greater than an emitter voltage of said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected; said protection PNP transistor being realized in said integrated circuit in a position substantially adjacent to said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected, the parasitic transistor pulling current from respective base pockets of both PNP transistors and the PNP protection transistor supplying a counterbalancing current to the base pocket of the adjacent PNP transistor to be protected.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 138 words
A protection device against the driving effect of a parasitic transistor upon an adjacent PNP transistor in the layout of a bipolar type monolithic integrated circuit comprising a protection PNP transistor having an emitter, a base and a collector, the collector being connected to a base of said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected, the emitter being connected to a circuit node at a voltage equal to or greater than an emitter voltage of said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected; said protection PNP transistor being realized in said integrated circuit in a position substantially adjacent to said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected, the parasitic transistor pulling current from respective base pockets of both PNP transistors and the PNP protection transistor supplying a counterbalancing current to the base pocket of the adjacent PNP transistor to be protected.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 16 words
The device of claim 1 wherein the base of said protection PNP transistor is left disconnected.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 29 words
The device of claim 1 wherein the base of said protection PNP transistor is connected to a network for adjusting the current gain (β) of the protection PNP transistors.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 59 words
The device of claim 3 wherein said protection PNP transistor has substantially the same dimensions as said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected, respective base's pockets of the two PNP transistors being substantially at the same distance from an emitter's pocket of said parasitic transistor, and the (β) current gain of said protection transistor being substantially equal to unity.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 31 words
The device of claim 1 wherein said protection PNP transistor has smaller dimensions that those of said adjacent PNP transistor to be protected and a β current gain greater than unity.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

GB910976A Cited
US4496849A Cited
US4558286A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1991-10-04 1992-04-04 1992-10-04 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1995-10-04 1996-04-04 1996-10-04 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1999-10-04 2000-04-04 2000-10-04 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag