US4767968A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System for controlling the operation of electrically powered apparatus
Assignee: American Sterilizer Co
•
Filing: 1984-10-18
•
Granted: 1988-08-30
•
Expires: 2004-10-18
Abstract
Abstract The preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a control system which permits operation of electrically powered apparatus in any one of several active modes from a controller mounted remotely from the apparatus. The system is particularly useful for controlling the operation of at least a pair of light sources. The system permits switching, from the controller, energizing power from an energized light source to a de-energized light source. Electrical communication between the controller of the system and the light head can be provided by only two electrical conductors.
Inventors
- 👤 Michael Geanous
- 👤 Richard G. Confer
- 👤 Richard C. Bainbridge
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 00:12
CPC Classifications
H; H05; H05B; H05B39/00; H05B39/04; H05B39/041; Y; Y02; Y02B; Y02B20/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
238 words
A system for providing bidirectional communication between an electric light having at least two sources of visible light which can be individually energized and a controller located remotely with respect to said electric light, said system comprising: a source of voltage located at said controller for producing a voltage suitable for energizing said light sources; a pair of electrical conductors for applying said energizing voltage to the electric light; switch means located at the electric light for receiving said applied energizing voltage and energizing a light source in response thereto; means located at the controller for providing an indication in response to an interruption of current flowing between said source of voltage and said energized light source; first means located at the electric light for monitoring the integrity of said energized light source; and second means located at the electric light for monitoring the integrity of said de-energize light source, said switching means being responsive to said first means for monitoring such that upon failure of said energized light source energizing voltage is applied to the de-energized light source and said indicator means indicates the failure of said light source, and upon failure of the de-energized light source said energizing voltage is applied to the de-energized light source whereby said first means for monitoring causes said energizing voltage to be switched back to the good light source and said indicator means indicates the failure of said light source.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
238 words
A system for providing bidirectional communication between an electric light having at least two sources of visible light which can be individually energized and a controller located remotely with respect to said electric light, said system comprising: a source of voltage located at said controller for producing a voltage suitable for energizing said light sources; a pair of electrical conductors for applying said energizing voltage to the electric light; switch means located at the electric light for receiving said applied energizing voltage and energizing a light source in response thereto; means located at the controller for providing an indication in response to an interruption of current flowing between said source of voltage and said energized light source; first means located at the electric light for monitoring the integrity of said energized light source; and second means located at the electric light for monitoring the integrity of said de-energize light source, said switching means being responsive to said first means for monitoring such that upon failure of said energized light source energizing voltage is applied to the de-energized light source and said indicator means indicates the failure of said light source, and upon failure of the de-energized light source said energizing voltage is applied to the de-energized light source whereby said first means for monitoring causes said energizing voltage to be switched back to the good light source and said indicator means indicates the failure of said light source.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
The system recited by claim 1 wherein said second monitoring means monitors the integrity of said de-energized light source by monitoring the voltage on the low side of each of said de-energized light source and the energized light source.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
31 words
The system recited by claim 2 wherein said monitoring means determines that said de-energized light source has failed when the voltage at both said low sides drop below a predetermined level.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein said first monitoring means monitors the integrity of said energized light source by monitoring the level of illumination provided by said energized light source.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
25 words
The system recited by claim 1 wherein said means located at the controller for providing an indication includes a current sensor and an indicator lamp.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system recited by claim 1 wherein said first means for monitoring includes a photosensitive element and wherein said second means for monitoring includes a continuity check circuit.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3678286A
Cited
US3883777A
Cited
US3790846A
Cited
US4068216A
Cited
US4227119A
Cited
US4034259A
Cited
US4288844A
Cited
US4250432A
Cited
US4458179A
Cited
US4461974A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-08-30 | 1992-02-29 | 1992-08-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-08-30 | 1996-02-29 | 1996-08-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-08-30 | 2000-02-29 | 2000-08-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |