US4763277A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for obtaining information in an expert system
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1986-01-17
•
Granted: 1988-08-09
•
Expires: 2006-01-17
Abstract
Abstract A method for use in an expert system which selectively allows the system to avoid asking the user a question by providing the answer to that question based on related information that may have been previously attained in the system. The method involves providing an action attribute that can be attached to any node in the rule tree. The attribute is assigned to a node in the tree which provides an answer to a class question based on processing various other dependent nodes. When the answer is obtained, the action attribute then causes all other nodes in the rule base referencing the same class question to be set to the same answer. The user is therefore only requested to supply information as a last resort.
Inventors
- 👤 Thomas J. Ashford
- 👤 Nancy A. Burns
- 👤 Richard L. Flagg
- 👤 Christine T. Iwaskiw
- 👤 Roberta P. Starbird
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 16:56
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06N; G06N5/00; G06N5/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
139 words
In a method for collecting information by tracing a rule base of an expert system with a data processing system having a processing unit which functions with said expert system program as an inference engine, the improvement comprising the following steps in combination, (a) establishing in said rule base, a rule tree having a goal node and at least one evidence node which functions to present a class question to a user of said system, and, (b) selectively setting the answer in said one evidence node without obtaining said answer in response to asking said class question to said user, said step of setting the answer including the step of determining the answer to be set in accordance with information obtained from at least one other node in said rule base which does not ask the same class question.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
139 words
In a method for collecting information by tracing a rule base of an expert system with a data processing system having a processing unit which functions with said expert system program as an inference engine, the improvement comprising the following steps in combination, (a) establishing in said rule base, a rule tree having a goal node and at least one evidence node which functions to present a class question to a user of said system, and, (b) selectively setting the answer in said one evidence node without obtaining said answer in response to asking said class question to said user, said step of setting the answer including the step of determining the answer to be set in accordance with information obtained from at least one other node in said rule base which does not ask the same class question.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method recited in claim 1 in which said step of establishing said another node establishes said another node in the same said rule tree as said evidence node.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method recited in claim 2, further including the step of providing for use in each node of said rule base that can obtain data, an attribute which functions selectively to set said answer for said evidence node.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method recited in claim 3 in which said evidence node operates to present a class type question to said user only if the class question is designated "unasked," further including the step of designating said class question "asked" in response to said step of setting said answer from said other node.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method recited in claim 4 in which said step of establishing said another node includes the step of establishing an external node, further including the step of executing the external procedure specified by said external node in order to obtain said information.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method recited in claim 5 in which said expert system is operating to diagnose said data processing system and said said step of executing said external procedure is directed to determining a model number of a specific system component that is attached to said system.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method recited in claim 6 in which said step of executing said external procedure is directed to determininging the model number of a specific system component that is a printer.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method recited in claim 7 in which said step of executing said external procedure includes the step of conducting a test unit for determining a type of printer attached to said system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method recited in claim 1 in which said step of establishing said another node establishing said another node in a different rule tree than said evidence node.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4479241A
Cited
US4593367A
Cited
US4649515A
Cited
US4648044A
Cited
US4658370A
Cited
US4591983A
Cited
US4675829A
Cited
US4642782A
Cited
US4644479A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-08-09 | 1992-02-08 | 1992-08-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-08-09 | 1996-02-08 | 1996-08-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-08-09 | 2000-02-08 | 2000-08-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |