US4751480A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
One port magnetostatic wave resonator
Assignee: PHONE TEL COMMUNICATIONS Inc
•
Filing: 1986-11-14
•
Granted: 1988-06-14
•
Expires: 2006-11-14
Abstract
Abstract An overcoupled resonator having a resonant cavity defined by a thin film of magnetic material with a pair of end walls parallel to a transducer. Because this resonator is overcoupled, it is suitable for use in a broadband oscillator.
Inventors
- 👤 William E. Kunz
- 👤 Kok W. Chang
- 👤 Waguih S. Ishak
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 03:24
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03H; H03H2/00; H03H2/001
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
136 words
A resonator comprising: a planar slab of magnetic material in which magnetostatic waves can be generated, said slab being oriented parallel to and located at a distance d m from a first side of a reference plane P; a transducer adjacent to said slab at a distance d t from said first side of reference plane P for coupling electromagnetic energy into magnetostatic waves in said slab; an electrical ground adjacent to said slab at a distance d g from said first side of reference plane P; these distances satisfying the relationship d g <d m <d t and being selected such that, as a function of d m alone, the flux of electric field at a given time through said slab from said transducer is greater than the case when d t =d m .
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
136 words
A resonator comprising: a planar slab of magnetic material in which magnetostatic waves can be generated, said slab being oriented parallel to and located at a distance d m from a first side of a reference plane P; a transducer adjacent to said slab at a distance d t from said first side of reference plane P for coupling electromagnetic energy into magnetostatic waves in said slab; an electrical ground adjacent to said slab at a distance d g from said first side of reference plane P; these distances satisfying the relationship d g <d m <d t and being selected such that, as a function of d m alone, the flux of electric field at a given time through said slab from said transducer is greater than the case when d t =d m .
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
A resonator as in claim 1 wherein said slab has a thickness t m and wherein d m <d t <(d m +t m ), whereby said resonator is in a side coupled configuration.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
32 words
A resonator as in claim 1 wherein said slab has a thickness t m and wherein (d m +t m )<d t , whereby said resonator is in a top coupled embodiment.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
A resonator as in claim 3 wherein there exists a straight line that passes through said slab, said transducer and said ground, whereby the slab is located between the transducer and the electrical ground.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
57 words
A resonator as in claim 1 further comprising a dielectric substrate at a distance d d satisfying the relationship d g <d d <d m and positioned with respect to the slab, transducer and ground plane that the flux of electric field through the slab from the transducer is greater than when there is no dielectric substrate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
34 words
A resonator as in claim 5 wherein there exists a straight line that passes through said slab, said transducer and said ground, whereby the slab is located between the transducer and the electrical ground.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
34 words
A resonator as in claim 1 wherein said slab has a pair of parallel straight ends and wherein said transducer is a linear microstrip conductor adjacent to and parallel to one of these ends.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
56 words
A resonator as in claim 7 wherein said slab also has a pair of nonparallel sides, whereby the slab has a cross-section that is a quadrilateral with one pair of opposite parallel ends and one pair of opposite nonparallel sides, whereby the existence of nonparallel sides inhibits resonant modes between the nonparallel sides of the slab.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
A resonator as in claim 7 wherein said linear conductor has a length L' less than one-fourth the electrical wavelength of a current signal frequency f 2 in said linear conductor.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
A resonator as in claim 7 wherein said linear conductor is positioned at a distance D from the nearest end of said pair of parallel ends and wherein D is less than 100 microns.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
67 words
Apparatus as in claim 7 wherein said transducer is coupled to a negative resistance device that exhibits to said resonator a reflection coefficient S' 11 that has an absolute magnitude that is greater than the absolute magnitude of 1/G 1 over the range of frequencies from f 1 to f 2 , whereby said apparatus will oscillate at a frequency between f 1 and f 2 .
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
85 words
A resonator as in claim 1 wherein said transducer produces in said slab a magnetic field that couples to the magnetostatic waves in said slab strongly enough that said transducer exhibits a reflection coefficient that as a function of frequency, G 1 (f), when plotted on a Smith chart, encircles the origin of the Smith chart over a frequency range of interest contained within a resonance peak corresponding to a resonant response of the resonator at frequency f r , whereby said resonator is overcoupled.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
39 words
A resonator as in claim 12 wherein said plot of G 1 (f) on a Smith Chart, encircles the origin of the Smith Chart only once, said encirclement occurring as f passes through said resonance at f r .
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
67 words
Apparatus as in claim 13 wherein said transducer is coupled to a negative resistance device that exhibits to said resonator a reflection coefficient S' 11 that has an absolute magnitude that is greater than the absolute magnitude of 1/G 1 over the range of frequencies from f 1 to f 2 , whereby said apparatus will oscillate at a frequency between f 1 and f 2 .
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
48 words
A resonator as in claim 12 wherein said transducer is a linear microstrip conductor that is shorted at one end so that, except for a range of frequencies within the resonance peak at f r , G 1 (f) lies in the inductive half of the Smith Chart.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
67 words
Apparatus as in claim 15 wherein said transducer is coupled to a negative resistance device that exhibits to said resonator a reflection coefficient S' 11 that has an absolute magnitude that is greater than the absolute magnitude of 1/G 1 over the range of frequencies from f 1 to f 2 , whereby said apparatus will oscillate at a frequency between f 1 and f 2 .
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
67 words
Apparatus as in claim 12 wherein said transducer is coupled to a negative resistance device that exhibits to said resonator a reflection coefficient S' 11 that has an absolute magnitude that is greater than the absolute magnitude of 1/G 1 over the range of frequencies from f 1 to f 2 , whereby said apparatus will oscillate at a frequency between f 1 and f 2 .
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
67 words
Appratus as in claim 1 wherein said transducer is coupled to a negative resistance device that exhibits to said resonator a reflection coefficient S' 11 that has an absolute magnitude that is greater than the absolute magnitude of 1/G 1 over the range of frequencies from f 1 to f 2 , whereby said apparatus will oscillate at a frequency between f 1 and f 2 .
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-06-14 | 1991-12-14 | 1992-06-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-06-14 | 1995-12-14 | 1996-06-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-06-14 | 1999-12-14 | 2000-06-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |