US4744239A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for monitoring a work vehicle suspension
Assignee: Caterpillar Inc
•
Filing: 1986-11-28
•
Granted: 1988-05-17
•
Expires: 2006-11-28
Abstract
Abstract Off-highway trucks generally rely on a suspension system which employs a plurality of gas-over-liquid type struts. These struts are critical to proper operation of the vehicle such that a single collapsed strut can have serious manifestations in structural damage, tire wear, and payload monitor accuracy. These consequences can be mitigated by an accurate and reliable strut monitor. Pressure type sensors are disposed on each of the struts and their pressure is monitored during three critical phases of operation. These phases include static, loading, and roading modes and each mode requires a distinct method for detecting a collapsing strut. The presence of a collapsing strut, detected by any of the three methods, is communicated to the vehicle operator whereby operation can be immediately suspended. The system avoids the serious consequences of vehicle operation with a collapsed strut by providing the operator with immediate and positive feedback on the condition of the struts.
Inventors
- 👤 Christos T. Kyrtsos
- 👤 Adam J. Gudat
- 👤 F. Paul Lutgen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 23:49
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01M; G01M17/00; G01M17/007; G01M17/04; B; B60; B60G; B60G17/00; B60G17/015; B60G17/018; B60G17/0185; B60G2300/00; B60G2300/02; B60G2300/026; B60G2300/07; B60G2400/00; B60G2400/20; B60G2400/204; B60G2400/50; B60G2400/51; B60G2400/52; B60G2400/60; B60G2600/00; B60G2600/02; B60G2600/04; B60G2600/08
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim
116 words
A method for detecting a collapsed strut of a work vehicle having a plurality of left and right strut mounted wheels, comprising: periodically sensing the internal pressure of each of the struts and delivering a plurality of first signals each having a magnitude correlative to the internal pressure of each respective strut; calculating ratios of the first signals of selected pairs of the struts; comparing the magnitude of each of the ratios to an upper and lower setpoint and delivering a second signal in response to at least one of the ratios being outside the upper and lower setpoints; and delivering a third signal indicative of a collapsed strut in response to receiving the second signal.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
116 words
A method for detecting a collapsed strut of a work vehicle having a plurality of left and right strut mounted wheels, comprising: periodically sensing the internal pressure of each of the struts and delivering a plurality of first signals each having a magnitude correlative to the internal pressure of each respective strut; calculating ratios of the first signals of selected pairs of the struts; comparing the magnitude of each of the ratios to an upper and lower setpoint and delivering a second signal in response to at least one of the ratios being outside the upper and lower setpoints; and delivering a third signal indicative of a collapsed strut in response to receiving the second signal.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
45 words
A method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of calculating the ratios of the first signals of selected pairs of struts includes calculating the ratios of the first signals of selected front struts relative to the first signals of selected rear struts.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method, as set forth in claim 2, wherein the step of calculating ratios includes calculating the ratio of the left front and right rear first signals and calculating the ratio of the right front and left rear first signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
56 words
A method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of comparing includes comparing the magnitude of each of the ratios to distinct corresponding pairs of upper and lower setpoints and delivering the second signal in response to the magnitude of at least one of the ratios being outside the respective upper and lower setpoints.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method, as set forth in claim 4, including the step of calculating the upper setpoints corresponding to each respective ratio at the beginning of the life of the vehicle by increasing the calculated ratios of the first signals by a preselected percentage, and storing the ratios as the respective upper setpoints of each ratio.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method, as set forth in claim 4, including the step of calculating the lower setpoints corresponding to each respective ratio at the beginning of the life of the vehicle by decreasing the calculated ratios of the first signals by a preselected percentage, and storing the ratios as the respective lower setpoints of each ratio.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method, as set forth in claim 1, including the step of preventing calculation of the ratios in response to movement of the vehicle.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method, as set forth in claim 1, including the step of preventing comparing the ratios in response to movement of the vehicle.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2638777A
Cited
SU141329A1
Cited
US4317105A
Cited
GB2093946A
Cited
US4458234A
Cited
US4426683A
Cited
US4468650A
Cited
US4635739A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-05-17 | 1991-11-16 | 1992-05-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-05-17 | 1995-11-16 | 1996-05-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-05-17 | 1999-11-16 | 2000-05-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |