US4725778A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Detecting resistance faults
Assignee: British Gas PLC
•
Filing: 1985-10-16
•
Granted: 1988-02-16
•
Expires: 2005-10-16
Abstract
Abstract Resistance faults, for example across insulating joints of cathodically protected pipelines may be evaluated by comparing magnetic field strengths associated with a test current of predetermined frequency flowing into and away from the joint.
Inventors
- 👤 Leonard Brown
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 08:36
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R27/00; G01R27/02; G01R27/16; G01R31/00; G01R31/50; G01R31/52; G01R31/58
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim
144 words
A method of field testing insulation between two conducting bodies subject to earth leakage comprising connecting said bodies to a source of periodically varying test current, said source being part of portable apparatus powered by battery means, which test current partly flows to earth through said bodies, and detecting a small fault current flowing between the bodies using a hand-held fluxgate probe connected to said apparatus, said test current having a frequency above a low range caused by movements of said probe and below the frequency of currents normally imposed on the conducting bodies, said probe providing an output representing the magnetic field associated with said fault current, said output being passed to integrator means in said apparatus tuned to respond in a frequency hand which has a significant Q-factor and which has a centre value equal to the frequency of said test current.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
144 words
A method of field testing insulation between two conducting bodies subject to earth leakage comprising connecting said bodies to a source of periodically varying test current, said source being part of portable apparatus powered by battery means, which test current partly flows to earth through said bodies, and detecting a small fault current flowing between the bodies using a hand-held fluxgate probe connected to said apparatus, said test current having a frequency above a low range caused by movements of said probe and below the frequency of currents normally imposed on the conducting bodies, said probe providing an output representing the magnetic field associated with said fault current, said output being passed to integrator means in said apparatus tuned to respond in a frequency hand which has a significant Q-factor and which has a centre value equal to the frequency of said test current.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
44 words
A method according to claim 1, said output from said probe being fed to a high-gain magnetometer means before said integrator means, said fluxgate being compensated for unwanted static magnetic fields including the Earth's field by a charge taken on by said integrator means.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
76 words
A method according to claim 2, said output from said fluxgate being demodulated to base-band by said magnetometer means said fluxgate comprising a ferrous element in a nominally zero magnetic field under the action of a solenoid feed back loop defined by a first resistor, said integrator means producing additional feedback via a second resistor to transform a first order low-pass response of said magnetometer means into a second order band-pass response in said frequency band.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 1, said test current being driven by a voltage waveform obtained by direct switching of the battery supply without previous regulation.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 4, said voltage waveform comprising pulses with width of which is increased as battery output voltage falls to keep the area of said pulses constant, thus keeping said test current substantially constant.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2479219A
Cited
GB1419354A
Cited
GB1447256A
Cited
GB1537870A
Cited
GB1602877A
Cited
US4249126A
Cited
US4475078A
Cited
GB2119094A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-02-15 | 1991-08-17 | 1992-02-16 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-02-15 | 1995-08-17 | 1996-02-16 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-02-15 | 1999-08-17 | 2000-02-16 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |