US4717341A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Orthodontic appliance system
Assignee: University of Connecticut
•
Filing: 1986-01-13
•
Granted: 1988-01-05
•
Expires: 2006-01-13
Abstract
Abstract A force imparting orthodontic appliance system is provided wherein the components thereof are formed from fiber reinforced composite material comprising a polymeric matrix and at least five percent of a reinforcing fiber embedded in the matrix.
Inventors
- 👤 A. Jon Goldberg
- 👤 Charles J. Burstone
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 23:01
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61C; A61C7/00; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T428/00; Y10T428/29; Y10T428/2913; Y10T428/2929
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim
147 words
In an orthodontic appliance system for applying corrective forces to the teeth of a patient, the improvement wherein a force delivery component of the system is formed from a fiber reinforced composite material comprising a polymeric matrix and at least 5% by weight of reinforcing fibers embedded in the matrix, said composite material having a modulus of elasticity below 30×10 6 psi and a preselected ratio of Yield strength to modulus of elasticity within the range from a level comparable to that of 18-8 stainless steel up to at least 300 percent that of such stainless steel whereby more constant force levels can be applied with time and a continuous range of stiffness is achieved, said composite material having a higher maximum elastic deflection than said stainless steel and an ability to provide complex orthodontic configurations so as to enhance the ease and accuracy of force delivery.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
147 words
In an orthodontic appliance system for applying corrective forces to the teeth of a patient, the improvement wherein a force delivery component of the system is formed from a fiber reinforced composite material comprising a polymeric matrix and at least 5% by weight of reinforcing fibers embedded in the matrix, said composite material having a modulus of elasticity below 30×10 6 psi and a preselected ratio of Yield strength to modulus of elasticity within the range from a level comparable to that of 18-8 stainless steel up to at least 300 percent that of such stainless steel whereby more constant force levels can be applied with time and a continuous range of stiffness is achieved, said composite material having a higher maximum elastic deflection than said stainless steel and an ability to provide complex orthodontic configurations so as to enhance the ease and accuracy of force delivery.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 1 wherein said fiber reinforced composite material has a modulus of elasticity in the range of 0.3-30×10 6 psi.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 2 wherein said fiber is selected from the group consisting of continuous filaments and short fibers of inorganic, natural and synthetic organic materials.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
16 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 2 wherein said matrix consists of thermoplastic or thermosetting material.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
31 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 4 wherein said matrix material is selected from the group consisting of polyamides, polyesters, polyester glycols, polycarbonates, polyolefins, polyarylates, polyurethanes, polyacetals, polyarylsulfides, polysulfones and epoxies.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
47 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 1 wherein said fiber reinforced composite material has a ratio of yield strength to modulus of elasticity in the range of 4×10 -3 to 40×10 -3 and a modulus of elasticity in the range of 0.5×10 6 to 25×10 6 psi.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 1 wherein said fiber reinforced composite material contains about 5-80 percent short fiber and exhibits a modulus of elasticity up to about 5×10 6 psi.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 1 wherein the fiber reinforced composite material contains continuous filaments and exhibits a modulus of elasticity in the range of about 1.5×10 6 psi to 25×10 6 psi.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
40 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 1 wherein the fiber reinforced composite material has a predominant number of well dispersed fibers sufficiently in alignment to provide effective retention of the force delivery component during the application of said corrective forces.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
68 words
In an orthodontic appliance system for applying corrective forces to the teeth of a patient, the improvement wherein the attachment component of the system is formed from a fiber reinforced composite material comprised essentially of a polymeric matrix and at least 10 percent by weight fibers despersed throughout the matrix and having a predominant orientation sufficient to effectively resist the maximum torque applied by the force delivery component.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
68 words
In an orthodontic appliance system for applying corrective forces to the teeth of a patient, the improvement wherein the attachment component of the system is formed from a fiber reinforced composite material comprised essentially of a polymeric matrix and at least 10 percent by weight fibers despersed throughout the matrix and having a predominant orientation sufficient to effectively resist the maximum torque applied by the force delivery component.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
29 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 10 wherein said fibers are selected from the group consisting of continuous filaments and short fibers of inorganic, natural and synthetic organic materials.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
16 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 10 wherein said matrix consists of thermoplastic or thermosetting material.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
31 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 10 wherein said matrix material is selected from the group consisting of polyamides, polyesters, polyester glycols, polycarbonates, polyolefins, polyarylates, polyurethanes, polyacetals, polyarylsulfides, polysulfones and epoxies.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
32 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 10 wherein said fiber reinforced composite material contains up to 80 percent short fiber and exhibits a modulus of elasticity up to about 5×10 6 psi.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
34 words
The orthodontic appliance system of claim 10 wherein the fiber reinforced composite material contains continuous filaments and exhibits a modulus of elasticity in the range of about 1.5×10 6 psi to 25×10 6 psi.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-01-04 | 1991-07-06 | 1992-01-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-01-04 | 1995-07-06 | 1996-01-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-01-04 | 1999-07-06 | 2000-01-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |