Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
289 words
A non-invasive method for the detection of torsional injuries in the lumbar spine of a patient, comprising the steps of: (a) detachably fixing a string of separate, dot-sized skin-markers onto the skin of the back of the patient in the middle of his spine from at least thoracic vertebra T10 down to at least sacral vertebra S 3 ; (b) monitoring and recording the relative positions of said skin-markers on the back of the patient as he leans to the left and then to the right off his saggital plane; (c) comparing the recorded positions of the skin-markers when the patient was leant to the left with the recorded positions of said skin-markers when the patient was leant to the right in order to determine whether there is a significant difference between both of said recorded positions; and (d) in the case where there is such a significant difference, determining whether said different recorded positions are symmetrical with respect to the saggital plane, wherein: the observations of a non significant difference between the recorded positions of the skin-markers indicates a refusal by the patient to flex his spine, such a refusal in turn indicating the presence of a double torsional injury having damaged any lumbar intervertebral joints statistically between vertebrae L 4 and L 5 or L 5 and S 1 ; and provided that the recorded positions of said skin-markers are different, the observation of a substantial assymmetry between said recorded positions indicates a refusal by the patient to flex his spine in one direction, such a refusal in turn indicating the presence of a simple torsional injury at any lumbar intervertebral joints statistically between vertebrae L 4 and L 5 or L 5 and S 1 .
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
289 words
A non-invasive method for the detection of torsional injuries in the lumbar spine of a patient, comprising the steps of: (a) detachably fixing a string of separate, dot-sized skin-markers onto the skin of the back of the patient in the middle of his spine from at least thoracic vertebra T10 down to at least sacral vertebra S 3 ; (b) monitoring and recording the relative positions of said skin-markers on the back of the patient as he leans to the left and then to the right off his saggital plane; (c) comparing the recorded positions of the skin-markers when the patient was leant to the left with the recorded positions of said skin-markers when the patient was leant to the right in order to determine whether there is a significant difference between both of said recorded positions; and (d) in the case where there is such a significant difference, determining whether said different recorded positions are symmetrical with respect to the saggital plane, wherein: the observations of a non significant difference between the recorded positions of the skin-markers indicates a refusal by the patient to flex his spine, such a refusal in turn indicating the presence of a double torsional injury having damaged any lumbar intervertebral joints statistically between vertebrae L 4 and L 5 or L 5 and S 1 ; and provided that the recorded positions of said skin-markers are different, the observation of a substantial assymmetry between said recorded positions indicates a refusal by the patient to flex his spine in one direction, such a refusal in turn indicating the presence of a simple torsional injury at any lumbar intervertebral joints statistically between vertebrae L 4 and L 5 or L 5 and S 1 .
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1, wherein use is made in step (a) of skin-markers of the visible type and wherein step (b) is carried out with at least one camera.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 2, wherein step (b) is carried out with a pair of cameras spaced-apart from each other in order to monitor and record the relative positions of the skin-markers in the space and thus determine any variation of lumbar curve in every spatial direction when the patient is leaning to the right and to the left.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
197 words
A kit for the detection of torsional injuries in the lumbar spine of a patient, said equipment comprising: (a) a plurality of separate, dot-sized skin-markers attachable to the skin of the back of the patient to form a string along the midline of his spine from at least thoracic vertebra T 10 down to at least sacral vertebra S 3 : (b) a visualization equipment means for observing and monitoring the relative positions of said skin-markers on the back of the patient as he leans to the left and to the right off his saggital plane; (c) means connected to the visualization equipment means for recording the monitored positions of the skin-markers when the patient is leaning to the left and to the right; and (d) means connected to the recording means for comparing the recorded positions of the skin-markers when the patient was leant to the left with the recorded position of said skin-markers when the patient was leant to the right in order to determine whether there is a significant difference therebetween and, in the case where there is such a difference, whether the different recorded positions are symmetrical with respect to the saggital plane.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
197 words
A kit for the detection of torsional injuries in the lumbar spine of a patient, said equipment comprising: (a) a plurality of separate, dot-sized skin-markers attachable to the skin of the back of the patient to form a string along the midline of his spine from at least thoracic vertebra T 10 down to at least sacral vertebra S 3 : (b) a visualization equipment means for observing and monitoring the relative positions of said skin-markers on the back of the patient as he leans to the left and to the right off his saggital plane; (c) means connected to the visualization equipment means for recording the monitored positions of the skin-markers when the patient is leaning to the left and to the right; and (d) means connected to the recording means for comparing the recorded positions of the skin-markers when the patient was leant to the left with the recorded position of said skin-markers when the patient was leant to the right in order to determine whether there is a significant difference therebetween and, in the case where there is such a difference, whether the different recorded positions are symmetrical with respect to the saggital plane.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
43 words
The kit of claim 4, wherein said skin-markers are of the visible type, said visualization equipment means comprises at least one camera and said means for comparing the recorded positions comprises a T.V. monitor on which both recorded positions may be displayed simultaneously.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
66 words
The kit of claim 5, wherein said visualization kit comprises another camera for monitoring the relative positions of the skin-markers on the back of the patient from a spaced-apart position with respect to the one camera, and wherein means are provided for processing the information recorded by both cameras in order to termine the spatial relationship between the various skin-markers as the patient flexes his spine.