US4665828A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Penetrator for a driving-cage projectile and the process of manufacturing the same
Assignee: Voestalpine AG
•
Filing: 1984-11-23
•
Granted: 1987-05-19
•
Expires: 2004-11-23
Abstract
Abstract The invention relates to a penetrator (1, 11) made of heavy metal, such as, for instance, tungsten heavy metal or depleted uranium, for driving-cage projectiles which have the penetrator led by the driving cage in the gun barrel. The driving cage (6, 12) detaches itself from the penetrator after the launch. The penetrator (1, 11) shows lower strength and higher ductility in the middle portion (d) of its length than in its head portion (c) and, in its tail portion, it shows higher strength and lower ductility than in its middle portion (d) and lower strength and higher ductility than in its head portion (c). This shall decrease the risk of fracture when striking an armour. The varying strength values in the head portion (c), in the middle portion (d) and in the tail portion (e) are obtained by cold-hammering under varying degrees of deformation, by sintering from various powder mixtures or by varying partial heat-treatment in the various portions (head portion c, middle portion d and tail portion e), and these measures can be applied individually or in combination. At least one pilot core (14, 15) which is only loosely connected to the penetrator (1, 11) can also be fitted to the head portion.
Inventors
- 👤 Ekkehard Auer
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 03:03
CPC Classifications
F; F42; F42B; F42B12/00; F42B12/02; F42B12/04; F42B12/06; F42B14/00; F42B14/06; F42B14/061
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 26
Claim 1
Independent Claim
91 words
A penetrator comprising a body consisting of heavy metal selected from the group tungsten heavy metal, uranium and depleted uranium, for use in a driving cage, said body being built in one piece from its head portion to its tail portion, wherein said body has lower strength and higher ductility in a middle portion of its length than in its head portion and wherein in its tail portion it has higher strength and lower ductility than in its middle portion but lower strength and higher ductility than in its head portion.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
91 words
A penetrator comprising a body consisting of heavy metal selected from the group tungsten heavy metal, uranium and depleted uranium, for use in a driving cage, said body being built in one piece from its head portion to its tail portion, wherein said body has lower strength and higher ductility in a middle portion of its length than in its head portion and wherein in its tail portion it has higher strength and lower ductility than in its middle portion but lower strength and higher ductility than in its head portion.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
20 words
A penetrator as in claim 1 including at least one pilot core connected to the head portion of said body.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
22 words
A penetrator as in claim 2 wherein the pilot core consists of the same material as the head portion of said body.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
A penetrator as in claim 2 wherein the pilot core has at least the same hardness as the head portion of said body.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
A penetrator as in claim 2 wherein the pilot core is abutted against the acceleration force at the front end of said body.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
A penetrator as in claim 2 wherein the pilot core is covered by a streamlined cap fastened to the front end of said body.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
14 words
A penetrator as in claim 6 in the streamlined cap is made of aluminum.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
35 words
A penetrator as in claim 6 wherein the streamlined cap is screwed to the front end of said body and wherein the pilot core is supported at the cap under insertion of a rubber ring.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
106 words
A penetrator as in claim 6 wherein there are at least two pilot cores connected to the front end of said body, with the front pilot core having a smaller diameter than the rear pilot core and the rear pilot core having a smaller diameter than the front area of said body, wherein the rear pilot core is centered by a rim-band at the front area of said body and the front pilot core is centered by a rim-band at the front area of the rear pilot core, and wherein the front pilot core is supported against the streamlined cap under insertion of a rubber ring.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
43 words
A process of manufacturing the body of a penetrator as in claim 1 comprising cold hammering the body, with a higher degree of deformation in the portions of higher strength and lower ductility than in the portions of higher ductility and lower strength.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
48 words
A process as in claim 10 wherein the body is cold hammering from a blank part which has a larger diameter in the portions corresponding to the portions of higher strength of the body than in the portions corresponding to the portions of lower strength of the body.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
48 words
A process as in claim 10 wherein cold hammering in the head portion of the body is performed with a deformation degree of up to 30 percent and cold hammering in the middle and tail portions of the body is performed with a deformation degree of 0-20 percent.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
48 words
A process as in claim 10 wherein cold hammering in the head portion of the body is performed with a deformation degree of 6-20 percent, in the middle portion with a deformation degree of 2-12 percent and in the tail portion with a deformation degree of 4-16 percent.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
54 words
A process as in claim 10 wherein a blank part is used that is homogenous along its length and that consists of a homogenous alloy of 90-99 percent of tungsten heavy metal, the rest being selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, copper, manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, one or more at the same time.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
A process as in claim 10 wherein the body is subjected to an annealing heat treatment at 800°-1550° C.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
33 words
A process of manufacturing the body of a penetrator as in claim 1 out of depleted uranium, comprising subjecting the body to a varying partial heat treatment in the portions of varying strength.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
58 words
A process as in claim 16 wherein the body is made of a uranium alloy containing about 0.7 percent titanium and wherein the body is partially heat-treated at a temperature of 400°-600° C. in the head portion, at a temperature of 180°-300° C. in the middle portion and at a temperature of 350°-450° C. in the tail portion.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
58 words
A process as in claim 16 wherein the body is made of a uranium alloy containing about 0.7 percent titanium and wherein the body is partially heat-treated at a temperature of 400°-500° C. in the head portion, at a temperature of 180°-220° C. in the middle portion and at a temperature of 350°-400° C. in the tail portion.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
60 words
A process as in claim 16 wherein the body is made of an alloy of depleted uranium containing about 2 percent molybdenum and wherein the body is partially heat-treated at a temperature of 350°-400° C. in the head portion, at a temperature of 520°-670° C. in the middle portion and at a temperature of 400°-550° C. in the tail portion.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
60 words
A process as in claim 16 wherein the body is made of an alloy depleted uranium alloy containing about 2 percent molybdenum and wherein the body is partially heat-treated at a temperature of 350°-400° C. in the head portion, at a temperature of 520°-570° C. in the middle portion and at a temperature of 400°-450° C. in the tail portion.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
43 words
A process as in claim 16 including cold hammering the head portion of the body with a deformation degree of up to 30 percent and cold hammering in the middle and tail portions of the penetrator with a deformation degree of 2-12 percent.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
46 words
A process as in claim 16 including cold hammering in the head portion of the penetrator with a deformation degree of 6-20 percent, in the middle portion with a deformation degree of 2-12 percent and in the tail portion with a deformation degree of 4-16 percent.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
20 words
A process as in claim 21 wherein the body is heat-treated at a temperature of 300°-800° C. after cold hammering.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
125 words
A penetrator comprising a body of heavy metal selected from the group tungsten heavy metal, uranium and depleted uranium, for use in a driving cage, said body being built in one piece from its head portion to its tail portion, wherein said body has a high strength of 1100 to 2000 N/sq. mm and low ductility in its head portion, a lower strength of 600 to 900 N/sq. mm and higher ductility in a middle portion of its length and wherein in its tail portion it has higher strength and lower ductility than in its middle portion but lower strength and higher ductility than in its head portion, the strength values in said tail portion increasing from said middle portion up to 1300 N/sq. mm.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
125 words
A penetrator comprising a body of heavy metal selected from the group tungsten heavy metal, uranium and depleted uranium, for use in a driving cage, said body being built in one piece from its head portion to its tail portion, wherein said body has a high strength of 1100 to 2000 N/sq. mm and low ductility in its head portion, a lower strength of 600 to 900 N/sq. mm and higher ductility in a middle portion of its length and wherein in its tail portion it has higher strength and lower ductility than in its middle portion but lower strength and higher ductility than in its head portion, the strength values in said tail portion increasing from said middle portion up to 1300 N/sq. mm.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2393648A
Cited
US2435095A
Cited
US2922366A
Cited
US3302570A
Cited
US3880083A
Cited
US3746581A
Cited
US4524695A
Cited
US4458599A
Cited
US4428295A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-05-18 | 1990-11-17 | 1991-05-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-05-18 | 1994-11-17 | 1995-05-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-05-18 | 1998-11-17 | 1999-05-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |