US4665528A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Distributed-feedback semiconductor laser device
Assignee: Hitachi Ltd
•
Filing: 1984-12-14
•
Granted: 1987-05-12
•
Expires: 2004-12-14
Abstract
Abstract Disclosed is a distributed feedback semiconductor laser provided with a grating which effects optical feedback by means of periodic corrugation disposed inside an optical resonator. The optical resonator has at least two regions having different bragg wavelength, and these regions are arranged longitudinally in the direction of an optical axis. The laser device can realize stable single longitudinal mode oscillation.
Inventors
- 👤 Naoki Chinone
- 👤 Shinji Tsuji
- 👤 Yoshihisa Fujisaki
- 👤 Yasutoshi Kashiwada
- 👤 Motohisa Hirao
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 09:48
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01S; H01S5/00; H01S5/10; H01S5/12; H01S5/1225; H01S5/1053; H01S5/106; H01S5/1206; H01S5/1215
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
123 words
In a distributed feedback semiconductor laser device equipped with a grating for effecting optical feedback by means of periodic corrugation inside an optical resonator, the improvement wherein said optical resonator has at least two regions of different Bragg wavelengths, said regions being arranged longitudinally in the direction of an optical axis, and wherein the selected Bragg wavelength of each of said at least two regions is selected so that the wavelength of one of modes having the smallest threshold gain and being the nearest to the Bragg wavelength of one of said regions, and the wavelength of one of modes having the smallest threshold gain and being the nearest to the Bragg wavelength of another of said regions substantially agree with each other.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
123 words
In a distributed feedback semiconductor laser device equipped with a grating for effecting optical feedback by means of periodic corrugation inside an optical resonator, the improvement wherein said optical resonator has at least two regions of different Bragg wavelengths, said regions being arranged longitudinally in the direction of an optical axis, and wherein the selected Bragg wavelength of each of said at least two regions is selected so that the wavelength of one of modes having the smallest threshold gain and being the nearest to the Bragg wavelength of one of said regions, and the wavelength of one of modes having the smallest threshold gain and being the nearest to the Bragg wavelength of another of said regions substantially agree with each other.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
32 words
The distributed feedback semiconductor laser device as claimed in claim 1 wherein said regions of said optical resonator comprise a plurality of regions of said grating having periodic corrugations having different periods.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
40 words
The distributed feedback semiconductor laser device as defined in claim 1 wherein said regions of said optical resonator comprise a plurality of regions of said grating having different distances between an active layer and the surface of said periodic corrugation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
40 words
The distributed feedback semiconductor laser device as defined in claim 2 wherein said regions of said optical resonator comprise a plurality of regions of said grating having different distances between an active layer and the surface of said periodic corrugation.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
64 words
The distributed feedback semiconductor laser device as defined in claim 1 wherein said regions of said optical resonator comprise a plurality of said regions of said grating having a difference of thickness in semiconductor layers having a smaller refractive index than an active layer existing on the side opposite to the side on which said corrugation exists, with said active layer being the center.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
32 words
The distributed feedback semiconductor laser device as defined in claim 1 wherein the thickness of active layers of a plurality of said regions of said optical resonator are different from one another.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
28 words
The distributed feedback semiconductor laser device as defined in claim 1 wherein optical guiding layers of a plurality of said regions of said optical resonator have different compositions.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
32 words
The distributed feedback semiconductor laser device as defined in claim 1 wherein the thickness of cladding layers of a plurality of said regions of said optical resonator are different from one another.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
110 words
In a distributed feedback semiconductor laser device equipped with a grating for effecting optical feedback by means of periodic corrugation inside an optical resonator, the improvement wherein said optical resonator has at least two regions which are of different construction from one another so that said two regions have different Bragg wavelengths from one another, said regions being arranged longitudinally in the direction of the optical axis, and wherein the oscillating wavelengths of said laser is a single mode which corresponds to respective modes of said at least two regions which modes have the smallest threshold gain and are nearest to the Bragg wavelengths of said at least two regions.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
110 words
In a distributed feedback semiconductor laser device equipped with a grating for effecting optical feedback by means of periodic corrugation inside an optical resonator, the improvement wherein said optical resonator has at least two regions which are of different construction from one another so that said two regions have different Bragg wavelengths from one another, said regions being arranged longitudinally in the direction of the optical axis, and wherein the oscillating wavelengths of said laser is a single mode which corresponds to respective modes of said at least two regions which modes have the smallest threshold gain and are nearest to the Bragg wavelengths of said at least two regions.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4096446A
Cited
JPS58197788A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-05-11 | 1990-11-10 | 1991-05-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-05-11 | 1994-11-10 | 1995-05-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-05-11 | 1998-11-10 | 1999-05-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |