Process and apparatus for the regulation of ink feed controls in an offset printing machine

Claim 2

A process for regulating ink feed controls in an offset printing machine which makes photoelectric measurements of printed products and determines setting values for ink feed elements for respective ink colors from said measurements, comprising the steps of: dividing a reference for the individual printing inks into a plurality of image elements and determining the surface coverage for each element, the reference being in the form of at least one of a printing plate, a photogrpahic master upon which said plate is based, and a printed product which has previously been determined to be satisfactory; determining a reference reflectance value R s for each image element for each respective color of printing ink as a function of at least one of such parameters as a printing characteristic, and the effect of full tone density upon reflectance variation as a function of surface coverage; dividing printed products into image elements; determining, for each respective printing ink, an actual reflectance value R i for each image element of said printed products; and determining setting values ST for the ink feed control elements by comparing the actual reflectance values R i with the corresponding reference reflective values R.sub. s.

Claim 3

A process according to claim 1, wherein each of a plurality of printing zones is defined by a plurality of image elements, and further comprising the steps of forming a reference zone value Z s and an actual zone value Z i from the respective reference values R s and actual reflectance values R i of the image elements defining a particular zone; and determining the setting values ST for the ink feed controls by comparing the actual zone values Z i with the reference zone values Z s .

Claim 4

A process according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of: assigning a full tone weighting factor G e to each image element as a function of the surface coverage and ink color measured, said weighting factor describing the effect of the full tone density on the reflectance; and weighting the differences between the actual reflectance values R i and the corresponding reference reflectance values R s with the associated full tone weighting factor G e .

Claim 5

A process according to claim 3, further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, determining a zone error value Δ z from differences Δ e between the actual reflectance values R i and the reference reflectance values R s of the image elements belonging to the printing zone involved by integrating the differences Δ e , weighted with the full tone weighting factor G e , over the print zone; and determining the setting values for the ink feed elements from the zone error values Δ z .

Claim 6

A process according to claim 3, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements of the reference is effected with a higher resolution than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed product.

Claim 7

A process according to claim 5, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is performed by measuring reflectance integrally over the surface area of the image elements.

Claim 8

A process according to claim 6, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is effected with a resolution ten times greater than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed products.

Claim 9

A process according to claim 7, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements ranges from 25 to 400 mm 2 .

Claim 10

A process according to claim 8, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements is approximately 1 cm 2 .

Claim 11

A process according to claim 9, further comprising the step of dividing the image elements into subelements of approximately 0.25 to 25 mm 2 in surface area.

Claim 12

A process according to claim 10, wherein the image elements are divided into subelements of approximately 1 mm 2 .

Claim 13

A process according to claim 10, further comprising the step of: determining a subreference reflectance value RS s for each subelement of an image element; and wherein the respective reference reflectance values R s of the image elements are determined from all of the respective subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 14

A process according to claim 12, wherein the reference reflectance value R s is calculated by averaging the subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 15

A process according to claim 13, further comprising the step of: assigning a sub-full tone weighting factor GS e to each subelement; and calculating the full tone weighting factor G e of an image element by averaging the sub-full tone weight factors GS e of the subelements of the respective image elements.

Claim 16

A process according to claim 14, further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, determining a zone error value Δ z from the differences Δ e between the actual reflectance values R i and the reference reflectance values R s of the image elements E belonging to the printing zone involved by integrating the differences Δ e , weighted with the full tone weighting factor G e , over the print zone; and determining the setting values for the ink feed elements from the zone error values Δ z .

Claim 17

A process according to claim 1 further comprising the steps of: assigning a full tone weighting factor G e to each image element as a function of the surface coverage and ink color measured, said weighting factor describing the effect of the full tone density on the reflectance; and weighting the deviations between the actual reflectance values R i and the corresponding actual reflectance values R s with the associated full tone weighting factor G e .

Claim 18

A process according to claim 16, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements of the reference is effected with a higher resolution than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed product.

Claim 19

A process according to claim 17, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is performed by measuring reflectance by integrating over the surface area of the image elements.

Claim 20

A process according to claim 18, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is effected with a resolution ten times greater than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values R i for the respective image elements of the printed products.

Claim 21

A process according to claim 19, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements ranges from 25 to 400 mm 2 .

Claim 22

A process according to claim 20, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements is approximately 1 cm 2 .

Claim 23

A process according to claim 17, further comprising the step of dividing the image elements into subelements of approximately 0.25 to 25 mm 2 .

Claim 24

A process according to claim 22, wherein the image elements are divided into subelements of approximately 1 mm 2 .

Claim 25

A process according to claim 22, further comprising the step of: determining a subreference reflectance value RS s for each subelement of an image element, taking into consideration important parameters of the printing process; and wherein the respective reference reflectance values R s of the image elements are determined from all of the respective subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 26

A process according to claim 24, wherein the reference reflectance value R s is calculated by averaging the subreference reflectance values RS s .

Claim 27

A process according to claim 24, further comprising the steps of: assigning a sub-full tone weighting factor GS e to each subelement; and calculating the full tone weighting factor G e of an image element by averaging the sub-full tone weight factors GS e of the subelements of the respective image elements.

Claim 28

A process according to claim 26, further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, determining a zone error value Δ z from differences Δ e between actual reflectance values R i and the reference reflectance values R s of the image elements belonging to the printing zone involved, by integrating the differences Δe, weighted with the full tone weighting factor G e , over the print zone; and determining the setting values for the ink feed elements from the zone error values Δ z .

Claim 29

The process according to claim 16, wherein, for each printing ink color, the reference reflectance values R s and the corresponding full tone weight factors G e of the image elements are obtained from the same reference.

Claim 30

The process according to claim 16, wherein the reference reflectance values R s are determined on the basis of a printed product found to be satisfactory, and the full tone weighting factors G e are determined from the corresponding printing plates of photographic masters.

Claim 31

The process according to claim 16, wherein the step of determining the reflectance values R i from the printed products is performed by measuring the printed products densitometrically in front of and behind each printing mechanism.

Claim 34

An apparatus according to claim 31, wherein the scanning device for the reference measures the reference with a higher resolution than that obtained when the scanning device for the print products measures the printed products.

Claim 35

An apparatus according to claim 31, further comprising: display means for graphically displaying at least one of the following: the measured reflectances of the reference, the reference reflectance values calculated therefrom, the actual reflectance values of the printed products, and the respective differences between the reference and actual reflectance values.

Claim 36

An apparatus according to claim 32 further comprising display means for graphically displaying at least one of the following: the measured reflectances of the reference, the reference reflectance values calculated therefrom, the actual reflectance values of the printed products, and the respective differences between the reference and actual reflectance values.

Claim 37

An offset printing machine, comprising: an apparatus for regulating ink feed controls in said offset printing machine, said apparatus further comprising a photoelectric scanning device for measuring a reference; a densitometric scanning device for measuring the printed products; and computing means, connected to at least one of the two scanning devices, for processing the measured values into setting values ST for the ink feed control elements of the printing machine and for outputting said values; wherein the scanning devices divide the reference and the print product into image elements and determine the surface coverage and the reflectance, respectively, for each printing ink in each image element; and wherein the computing means determines, with respect to each printing ink for each image element of the reference, a reference reflectance value R s from the measured surface coverages, taking into consideration at least one of such printing parameters as printing characteristic and the effect of full tone density, compares said reference value R s with a respective measured actual reflectance value R i of a corresponding image element of the printed product, and determines the setting values ST for the ink feed control elements from the results of said comparison.

Claim 38

An offset printing machine, comprising: an apparatus for regulating ink feed controls in said offset printing machine, said apparatus further comprising a photoelectric scanning device for measuring a reference; a densitometric scanning device for measuring the printed products; and computing means, connected to at least one of the two scanning devices, for processing the measured values into setting values ST for the ink feed control elements of the printing machine and for outputting said values; wherein the scanning devices divide the reference and the print product into image elements and determine the surface coverage and the reflectance, respectively, for each printing ink in each image element; and wherein the computing means determines, with respect to each printing ink for each image element of the reference, a reference reflectance value R s from the measured surface coverages, taking into consideration at least one of such printing parameters as printing characteristic and the effect of full tone density, compares said reference value R s with a respective measured actual reflectance value R i of a corresponding image element of the printed product, and determines the setting values ST for the ink feed control elements from the results of said comparison.