US4658362A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process modeling for superplastic forming of metal sheets
Assignee: MCD0NNELL DOUGLAS Corp
•
Filing: 1984-12-24
•
Granted: 1987-04-14
•
Expires: 2004-12-24
Abstract
Abstract Methods for developing particular models which accurately predict the material, process and design parameters for superplastic forming of metal parts under optimum conditions consistent with the desired properties in the finished part. Generalized control equations are developed which enable designers to develop consistency of the forming parameters for materials from different lots. The invention permits control of superplastic forming in accordance with particular raw material microstructure and the effects of time, temperature, strain and strain rate during superplastic forming on the material microstructure, and establishes the relationship between the microstructure and the properties of the parts being formed. These methods applied to the specific area of superplastic forming of metal sheets exemplify a more generalized method of conducting systematic research to derive the maximum information from a minimum number of experiments involving available data.
Inventors
- 👤 Dhananjay D. Bhatt
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 04:43
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/04; G06F; G06F30/00; G06F30/20; G06F2113/00; G06F2113/24
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 29
Claim 1
Independent Claim
140 words
The method of modeling and optimizing superplastic forming of metal parts comprising the steps of: (a) selecting generalized control equations for superplastic forming which relate the forming conditions of stress, strain rate, temperature and time duration to particular properties of the metal to be formed, wherein said forming conditions are expressed in said equations as variables interrelated by particular constants corresponding to the properties of the metal; (b) conducting a series of predetermined tests of specimens of the metal to be formed in order to develop data for determining said constants; (c) applying a selected statistical analysis procedure to the developed data to determine the particular constants for the metal to be formed which will optimize the forming process for that metal; and (d) forming the metal by superplastic forming in accordance with said control equations using said optimizing constants.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
140 words
The method of modeling and optimizing superplastic forming of metal parts comprising the steps of: (a) selecting generalized control equations for superplastic forming which relate the forming conditions of stress, strain rate, temperature and time duration to particular properties of the metal to be formed, wherein said forming conditions are expressed in said equations as variables interrelated by particular constants corresponding to the properties of the metal; (b) conducting a series of predetermined tests of specimens of the metal to be formed in order to develop data for determining said constants; (c) applying a selected statistical analysis procedure to the developed data to determine the particular constants for the metal to be formed which will optimize the forming process for that metal; and (d) forming the metal by superplastic forming in accordance with said control equations using said optimizing constants.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1 further including, prior to performing step (b), the step of selecting particular categories of tests to be performed on the metal specimens, which tests involve testing the specimens under various conditions to determine selected metal properties.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the categories of selected tests are: static microstructural change tests, high temperature uniaxial tension tests and high temperature biaxial cone tests.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 2 further including the steps of selecting the conditions which are to be varied during said tests and determining the levels of the variable conditions at which the metal specimens are tested.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 4 wherein one category of selected tests is static microstructural change tests, and wherein the variable conditions for such tests are: temperature, time at temperature and cooling rate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 5 wherein the static microstructural change tests involve tests at three different levels for each of the three variable conditions.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 4 wherein one category of selected tests is high temperature uniaxial tension tests, and wherein the conditions to be varied during the high temperature uniaxial tension tests are: strain, strain rate and temperature.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 7 wherein the high temperature uniaxial tension tests are conducted at three different levels for each of the three variable conditions thereof.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 4 wherein one category of tests is high temperature biaxial cone tests, and wherein the conditions which are to be varied during said tests are: forming temperature, forming pressure and forming time.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the high temperature biaxial cone tests are conducted at three different levels for each of the three variable conditions.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 3 wherein each of the different categories of tests is conducted at three different levels for each of three variable conditions related to the corresponding category.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 further including, following step (b), the step of recording data from the respective tests for statistical analysis.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the selected statistical analysis procedure is multiple regression analysis.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 13 further including the step of using a computer to perform stepwise multiple regression analysis on said data to develop the optimum values for said constants.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said generalized control equations are: ##EQU9## wherein: ε=strain rate σ=stress L=instantaneous beta phase grain size T=temperature L0=beta phase grain size prior to initiation of forming but after soaking L00=initial beta phase grain size of the material t=time A0, n0, a, b, B0, A1, n1, m1, B1, A2, n2 and B2 are constants which are related to properties of the material to be formed.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the selected statistical analysis procedure involves stepwise multiple regression analysis and wherein the constants A0, n0 and B0 are derived from the stepwise multiple regression analysis procedure applied to grain growth data developed from the static microstructural change tests.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the selected statistical analysis procedure involves stepwise multiple regression analysis and wherein the constants A1, n1, m1 and B1 are derived from the stepwise multiple regression analysis procedure applied to grain growth data developed from the high temperature uniaxial tension tests.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the selected statistical analysis procedure involves stepwise multiple regression analysis and wherein the constants a, b, A2, n2, and B2 are derived from the stepwise multiple regression analysis procedure applied to superplastic deformation data developed from the high temperature uniaxial tension and biaxial cone tests.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
114 words
The method of modeling and optimizing the superplastic forming of metal parts comprising the steps of: developing general control equations for superplastic forming relating selected forming variables of stress, strain rate, temperature and time duration to selected constants representative of particular properties of the metal to be formed; conducting selected tests of specimens from the lot of the material to be formed at different selected levels of selected condition variables; analyzing the results of said tests to derive specific values of the constants of said equations which are optimized for the particular material to be formed; using said optimized values for the constants in said equations to control the superplastic forming of the material.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
114 words
The method of modeling and optimizing the superplastic forming of metal parts comprising the steps of: developing general control equations for superplastic forming relating selected forming variables of stress, strain rate, temperature and time duration to selected constants representative of particular properties of the metal to be formed; conducting selected tests of specimens from the lot of the material to be formed at different selected levels of selected condition variables; analyzing the results of said tests to derive specific values of the constants of said equations which are optimized for the particular material to be formed; using said optimized values for the constants in said equations to control the superplastic forming of the material.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 19 wherein said control equations are: ##EQU10## wherein: ε=strain rate σ=stress L=instantaneous beta phase grain size T=temperature L0=beta phase grain size prior to initiation of forming but after soaking L00=initial beta phase grain size of the material t=time A0, n0, a, b, B0, A1, n1, m1, B1, A2, n2 and B2 are constants which are related to properties of the material to be formed.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 20 wherein the tests comprise static microstructural change tests, high temperature uniaxial tension tests and high temperature biaxial cone tests.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 21 wherein the selected condition variables of the static microstructural change tests are: temperature, time at temperature and cooling rate.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 21 wherein the selected condition variables of the high temperature uniaxial tension tests are: strain, strain rate and temperature.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 21 wherein the selected condition variables of the high temperature biaxial cone tests are: forming temperature, forming pressure and forming time.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 20 further including the steps of examining specimen microstructure to determine initial beta phase grain size and evaluating the specimen microstructure after the specimen tests have been performed to determine beta phase grain size prior to forming but after soaking.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 19 wherein the step of analyzing test results comprises using a computer to perform stepwise multiple regression analysis of test data in order to develop the optimized values for said constants.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 24 further including the step of analyzing experimentally formed specimens and comparing selected parameters thereof with predicted values derived from said equations in order to validate the equation constants derived from the test data.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4233831A
Cited
US4233829A
Cited
US4257093A
Cited
US4299111A
Cited
US4368509A
Cited
US4472770A
Cited
US4516419A
Cited
US4489579A
Cited
US4539645A
Cited
US4474044A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-04-13 | 1990-10-13 | 1991-04-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-04-13 | 1994-10-13 | 1995-04-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-04-13 | 1998-10-13 | 1999-04-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |