Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim
158 words
A flame quality analyzer for analyzing the quality of a flame from a burner, comprising: a fiber optic array including a plurality of optic fibers each having a light-receiving end for facing the flame, and lying on a line in a selected direction with respect to an axis of the burner wherein said fiber optic array transmits light from the flame corresponding to said selected direction; and light-processing means connected to said fiber optic array for processing light from the flame comprising a monochromator for receiving the light from the flame and spreading the light from the flame to its component wave length, said light processing means further including a detector having a first and a second detector array of light sensors extending in a line for receiving a portion of the light from the flame at two discrete wave lengths to generate two sets of signals, each set of signals including an output of each light sensor.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
158 words
A flame quality analyzer for analyzing the quality of a flame from a burner, comprising: a fiber optic array including a plurality of optic fibers each having a light-receiving end for facing the flame, and lying on a line in a selected direction with respect to an axis of the burner wherein said fiber optic array transmits light from the flame corresponding to said selected direction; and light-processing means connected to said fiber optic array for processing light from the flame comprising a monochromator for receiving the light from the flame and spreading the light from the flame to its component wave length, said light processing means further including a detector having a first and a second detector array of light sensors extending in a line for receiving a portion of the light from the flame at two discrete wave lengths to generate two sets of signals, each set of signals including an output of each light sensor.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
16 words
An analyzer according to claim 1, wherein said selected direction is parallel to the burner axis.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
16 words
An analyzer according to claim 1, wherein said selected direction is perpendicular to the burner axis.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
48 words
An analyzer according to claim 1, wherein the light from the flame has sodium and potassium wave length peaks, said first detector array positioned at said sodium peak and said second detector array positioned at said potassium peak on the light from the flame spread by said monochromator.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
45 words
An analyzer according to claim 1, including signal processing means connected to said light-processing means for receiving the two sets of signals and for calculating from the two sets of signals a temperature and a particle index profile for the flame along said selected direction.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
124 words
An analyzer according to claim 5, wherein the light from the flame spread by said monochromator has a sodium wave length peak and a potassium wave length peak, said first detector array positioned to receive said sodium wave length peak and said second detector array positioned to receive said potassium wave length peak, said signal processing means calculating the temperature profile according to the equation: ##EQU3## wherein C 2 equals 1.43879×10 -2 m·K λ Na is the wave length of the sodium peak, λ K is the wave length of the potassium peak, R is equal to the ratio of irradiance for the sodium and potassium peaks, and i refers to the ith set of light sensors in the first and second detector array.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
An analyzer according to claim 6, wherein said signal processing means includes a display for plotting the value T(i) for each light sensor set.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
54 words
An analyzer according to claim 7, wherein said signal processing means includes means for calculating the particle index profile in said selected direction according to the relationship: ##EQU4## wherein W.sub.K (i)=C.sub.1 λ.sub.K.sup.-5.sbsp.3.sup.-C.sbsp.w.sup./λ.sbsp.K.sup.T(i) and wherein C 1 equals 3.7415×10 -16 watt m 2 and I K is equal to the irradiance of the potassium peak.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
125 words
A method of analyzing the quality of a flame from a burner having a burner axis comprising: positioning a fiber optic array which includes a plurality of optic fibers each having a light-receiving end to face the flame, each light-receiving end lying on a line in a selected direction with respect to an axis of the burner; conveying a sheet of light from the flame over the fiber optic array to a monochromator; spreading the sheet of light in the monochromator into its component wave lengths; detecting the sheet of light at two separate and discrete wave lengths in the light from the flame to generate two sets of signals; and processing two sets of signals to calculate at least one property of the flame.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
125 words
A method of analyzing the quality of a flame from a burner having a burner axis comprising: positioning a fiber optic array which includes a plurality of optic fibers each having a light-receiving end to face the flame, each light-receiving end lying on a line in a selected direction with respect to an axis of the burner; conveying a sheet of light from the flame over the fiber optic array to a monochromator; spreading the sheet of light in the monochromator into its component wave lengths; detecting the sheet of light at two separate and discrete wave lengths in the light from the flame to generate two sets of signals; and processing two sets of signals to calculate at least one property of the flame.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method according to claim 9, including displaying the two sets of signals in the form of a graphic representation across the selected direction for the quality of the flame.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 10, including detecting the wave length of light at a sodium peak and at a potassium peak of the spread sheet of light.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
77 words
A method according to claim 11, including calculating a temperature distribution along the selected direction using the relationship: ##EQU5## wherein λC 2 equals 1.43879×10 -2 m·K λ Na is the wave length of the sodium peak, λ K is the wave length of the potassium peak, R is equal to the ratio of irradiance for the sodium and potassium peaks, and i refers to the ith set of light sensors in th first and second detector array.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
47 words
A method according to claim 12, including determining the particle index distribution across the selected direction according to the relationship: ##EQU6## wherein W.sub.K (i)=C.sub.1 λ.sub.K.sup.-5.sbsp.e.sup.-C.sbsp.w.sup./λ.sbsp.K.sup.T(i) and wherein C 1 equals 3.74515×10 -16 watt m 2 and I K is equal to the irradiance of the potassium peak.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method according to claim 13, including providing the light-receiving ends to lie in a selected direction parallel to the axis of the burner.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method according to claim 13, including providing the light-receiving ends to lie in a selected direction perpendicular to the axis of the burner.