← Back to Patent Explorer
US4642276A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method of assessing the activity of a photographic developer

Assignee: Agfa Gevaert NV
•
Filing: 1985-09-26
•
Granted: 1987-02-10
•
Expires: 2005-09-26
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method and an apparatus wherein wedge print density value comparisons made with the aid of a photoelectric densitometer give indications of the developing activity of a photographic developer which are independent of the temperature of the photodetector.

Inventors

  • 👤 Jean Burtin

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 16:26
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03C; G03C5/00; G03C5/26; G03C5/29; G03C5/31

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim 269 words
A method of assessing the developing activity of a photographic developer relative to a norm, which method comprises the steps of using the developer to develop a latent photographic image of a sensitometric wedge, determining density curve data pertaining to the resulting wedge print (hereinafter and in subsequent claims called "control print") by means of a photoelectric transmission densitometer, and comparing such data with analogous data pertaining to at least one reference wedge print resulting from the development of an identical latent sensitometric wedge image in a developer of given activity taken as norm, characterised in that the densitometer is used to determine in respect of the control print: (i) a notional density range in terms of the difference between the dark current of the photodetector of the densitometer and the output current of such detector when it is irradiated by light through the transparent support of such control print at an area of zero image density, and (ii) to determine at least one position along the control print where its image density, as measured in terms of the output current of said detector, is in a predetermined ratio to said notional density range; the data thus established pertaining to the control print is compared with analogous data pertaining to the reference print, established by means of the same densitometer, in order to determine the relationship between the positions along the control and reference prints at which their notional densities are in the same ratio to their respective notional density ranges, and the said relationship is used as a measure of the developing activity of the developer being assessed.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 35 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the developer being assessed is a high-contrast lith developer for use in developing halftone graphic art images and the said control and reference wedge prints are halftone prints.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 106 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the control print is scanned to determine the distance along the wedge print at which its image density measured in terms of the output current of said detector is in a predetermined ratio to its said notional density range; that distance is compared with the distance along the reference print at which its density value expressed in terms of output current from said detector is in that same predetermined ratio to the notional density range of that reference print; and the difference between those distances is registered as a measure of the sensitivity potential of the developer being assessed.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 125 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the control print is scanned to determine first and second positions therealong at which its image densities measured in terms of the output current of said detector are respectively in first and second predetermined ratios to the said notional density range of that print; the distance interval between those positions is compared with the distance interval between the two positions on the reference print at which its image densities expressed in terms of output current from said detector are in the same first and second predetermined ratios to the said notional density range of that reference print; and the difference between those distance intervals is registered as a measure of the contrast potential of the developer being assessed.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 17 words
A method according to claim 4, wherein said first and second predetermined ratios are 10% and 95%.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 80 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein for determining the notional density range of each of the control and reference wedge prints, the current from the said detector is measured when it is irradiated through a said zero image density area of the transparent print support and when the light source is switched on, and the output current of the detector at a time when the light source is switched off is taken as the dark current of said detector.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 44 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the support of the control wedge print bears a distance scale which is located alongside the wedge print for assisting recording of the distance between one end of the print and any particular position along the print.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 51 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said density curve data pertaining to the control print and comparison of such data with analogous data pertaining to the reference print are effected automatically by electronic means which yields output signals indicative of the developing activity of the developer relative to said norm.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 27 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the result of said comparison of analogous data is used for determining the addition of replenishing material to the developer.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3623418A Cited
US4081280A Cited
US4464036A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1990-02-09 1990-08-11 1991-02-10 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1994-02-09 1994-08-11 1995-02-10 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1998-02-09 1998-08-11 1999-02-10 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag