US4640694A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Adsorption process
Assignee: Linde GmbH
•
Filing: 1983-02-24
•
Granted: 1987-02-03
•
Expires: 2003-02-24
Abstract
Abstract A pressure swing adsorption process is suggested conducted with three adsorbers. Cocurrent expansion gas obtained after termination of the adsorption phase is utilized initially for scavenging another adsorber. Additional cocurrent expansion gas serves for pressure buildup in the scavenged adsorber. Whereas this first pressure buildup is performed preferably in the adsorption direction, the subsequent pressurizing to adsorption pressure is conducted with the use of product gas in countercurrent mode. Furthermore, a special adsorber construction is proposed.
Inventors
- 👤 Paul Leitgeb
- 👤 Johann Leis
- 👤 Dietmar Winkler
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 11:37
CPC Classifications
B; B01; B01D; B01D53/00; B01D53/02; B01D53/04; B01D53/047; B01D2253/00; B01D2253/10; B01D2253/106; B01D2253/108; B01D2256/00; B01D2256/12; B01D2257/00; B01D2257/10; B01D2257/102; B01D2259/00; B01D2259/40; B01D2259/40011; B01D2259/40013; B01D2259/40015; B01D2259/40028; B01D2259/4003; B01D2259/40035; B01D2259/40037; B01D2259/40043; B01D2259/4005; B01D2259/40052; B01D2259/40058; B01D2259/40066; B01D2259/403
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
258 words
In a pressure swing adsorption process wherein a gaseous mixture under elevated pressure is conducted in cyclic alternation through only three adsorbent-filled adsorbers, with selective adsorption of at least one first component and formation of a product depleted in said first component, each adsorber passing through mutually chronologically shifted switching cycles, and each switching cycle comprising an adsorption phase at maximum process pressure, expansion phases conducted first cocurrently and then countercurrently to the adsorption direction, a desorption phase at minimum process pressure, and pressure buildup phases for restoring the adsorption pressure, and wherein pressure equalization takes place between an adsorber in a cocurrent expansion phase and an adsorber in a pressure buildup phase, the improvement which comprises the following sequential phases: after termination of the adsorption phase of (a) a first adsorber, a first cocurrent expansion phase with the thus-obtained expansion gas being utilized for scavenging a second adsorber which is in a desorption phase; (b) a second cocurrent expansion phase with the thus-obtained expansion gas is utilized for pressurizing the second adsorber; (c) a countercurrent expansion phase during which a residual gas is withdrawn from the inlet end of the first adsorber; (d) the desorption phase during which scavenging is carried out with a cocurrent expanion gas from the third adsorber; and (e) two pressure buildup phases of which the first takes place in pressure equalization with the third adsorber which is in the second cocurrent expansion phase, and the second takes place by introduction of product gas by way of the outlet end of the adsorber.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
258 words
In a pressure swing adsorption process wherein a gaseous mixture under elevated pressure is conducted in cyclic alternation through only three adsorbent-filled adsorbers, with selective adsorption of at least one first component and formation of a product depleted in said first component, each adsorber passing through mutually chronologically shifted switching cycles, and each switching cycle comprising an adsorption phase at maximum process pressure, expansion phases conducted first cocurrently and then countercurrently to the adsorption direction, a desorption phase at minimum process pressure, and pressure buildup phases for restoring the adsorption pressure, and wherein pressure equalization takes place between an adsorber in a cocurrent expansion phase and an adsorber in a pressure buildup phase, the improvement which comprises the following sequential phases: after termination of the adsorption phase of (a) a first adsorber, a first cocurrent expansion phase with the thus-obtained expansion gas being utilized for scavenging a second adsorber which is in a desorption phase; (b) a second cocurrent expansion phase with the thus-obtained expansion gas is utilized for pressurizing the second adsorber; (c) a countercurrent expansion phase during which a residual gas is withdrawn from the inlet end of the first adsorber; (d) the desorption phase during which scavenging is carried out with a cocurrent expanion gas from the third adsorber; and (e) two pressure buildup phases of which the first takes place in pressure equalization with the third adsorber which is in the second cocurrent expansion phase, and the second takes place by introduction of product gas by way of the outlet end of the adsorber.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
Process according to claim 1, wherein the cocurrent expansion gas is conducted during the first pressure buildup phase, to the inlet end of the adsorber to be pressurized.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
15 words
Process according to claim 1 wherein the adsorption phase is conducted essentially at constant pressure.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
12 words
Process according to claim 1, wherein the desorption phase at atmospheric pressure.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
Process according to one of claims 1-4, wherein the flow cross section within an adsorber is reduced toward the adsorber outlet end.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
13 words
Process according to claim 5, wherein the cross section is reduced by 10-80%.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
18 words
A process according to claim 6 wherein the cross section is reduced over 20-80% of the adsorber length.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
A process according to claim 7 wherein the flow cross section is reduced by means of a flow-displacing member from which expansion gasses are withdrawn or to which scavenging or pressurizing gases are supplied.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
18 words
A process according to claim 6 wherein the cross section is reduced over 30-50% of the adsorber length.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
17 words
Process according to claim 5 wherein the cross section is reduced over 20-80% of the adsorber length.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
35 words
Process according to claim 5, wherein the flow cross section is reduced by means of a flow-displacing member from which expansion gases are withdrawn or to which scavenging gases or pressurizing gases, respectively, are supplied.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
14 words
A process according to claim 5, wherein the cross section is reduced by 40-60%.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
102 words
In an adsorber comprising a cylindrical vessel with a packing of adsorption material and with a gas inlet end as well as a gas outlet end at the opposed ends of the vessel, the improvement which comprises providing a displacement member filled with adsorbent in the zone of the gas outlet end, the displacement member being essentially axially aligned, open at its end oriented toward the gas outlet end of the vessel, and closed at its end oriented toward the gas inlet end of the vessel as well as being connected, at that location, with a conduit leading out of the vessel.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
102 words
In an adsorber comprising a cylindrical vessel with a packing of adsorption material and with a gas inlet end as well as a gas outlet end at the opposed ends of the vessel, the improvement which comprises providing a displacement member filled with adsorbent in the zone of the gas outlet end, the displacement member being essentially axially aligned, open at its end oriented toward the gas outlet end of the vessel, and closed at its end oriented toward the gas inlet end of the vessel as well as being connected, at that location, with a conduit leading out of the vessel.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
84 words
An adsorber according to claim 13, the displacement member comprises a unilaterally open pipe arranged concentrically to the vessel, the length of said pipe amounting to between 20% and 80% of the length of the adsorbent packing, the open end of said pipe having a distance from the outlet end of the adsorbent packing of between 5% and 30% of the length of the adsorbent packing, and the cross section of this pipe amounting to between 10% and 80% of the vessel cross section.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
37 words
An adsorber according to claim 14 wherein the open end of said pipe is at a distance from the outlet end of the adsorbent packing of between 8% and 15% of the length of the adsorbent packing.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
24 words
An adsorber according to claim 14 wherein the cross section of the pipe amounts to between 40 to 60% of the vessel cross section.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
21 words
An adsorber according to claim 16 wherein the length of the pipe is 30-50% of the length of the adsorbent packing.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
23 words
A pressure swing adsorption plant of three interconnected adsorbers, each being an adsorber defined according to claim 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
DE1769936A1
Cited
US3620685A
Cited
US3923477A
Cited
FR2322649A1
Cited
US4144038A
Cited
US4168149A
Cited
DE2702785A1
Cited
DE2724763A1
Cited
US4326858A
Cited
US4496376A
Cited
DE2823211A1
Cited
US4194892A
Cited
US4259091A
Cited
US4475929A
Cited
US4280824A
Cited
DE2904539A1
Cited
US4371380A
Cited
US4315759A
Cited
EP0023679A1
Cited
US4428372A
Cited
GB2082082A
Cited
US4402712A
Cited
DE3150690A1
Cited
US4431432A
Cited
US4340398A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-02-02 | 1990-08-04 | 1991-02-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-02-02 | 1994-08-04 | 1995-02-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-02-02 | 1998-08-04 | 1999-02-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |