US4639885A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
EMI suppression for electronic engine control frequency signal inputs
Assignee: RTX Corp
•
Filing: 1984-12-24
•
Granted: 1987-01-27
•
Expires: 2004-12-24
Abstract
Abstract Periodic digital signal samples of redundant sensed engine RPM signals are rejected for limit exceedance of known performance values, the nonrejected digital signal samples are each compared with a synthesized RPM equivalent signal to further reject any sample which differs from the synthesized value by more than a selected difference value, one of the nonrejected samples are then used for the engine RPM indication, and in the event that both samples are rejected the synthesized value is used.
Inventors
- 👤 Wayne R. Spock
- 👤 Richard P. Meisner
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 23:47
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B9/00; G05B9/02; G05B9/03; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/10; G05B2219/14; G05B2219/14035; G05B2219/14077; G05B2219/14078; G05B2219/14079
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 5
Claim 1
Independent Claim
176 words
Apparatus for use in digital electronic engine controls for selecting the best signal representation of a gas turbine engine parameter from among the sample values of two sensed signals representative of the parameter actual value, and a synthesized signal representative of the parameter nominal value, comprising: signal comparison means, responsive to the sampled values of each of the two sensed signals, for comparing each sample value to maximum and minimum performance value limits established for the parameter, and for rejecting those sensed signal samples which exceed these limits; and signal selection means, responsive to the nonrejected sensed signal samples from said signal comparison means for determining the difference signal magnitude between the sampled actual parameter value and the nominal value of the synthesized signal, for rejecting each previously nonrejected sensed signal sample having said difference value greater than a selected maximum, for selecting a nonrejected sensed signal sample as the parameter value in the presence of nonrejected samples, and for selecting the synthesized signal as the parameter value in the absence of nonrejected sensed signal samples.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
176 words
Apparatus for use in digital electronic engine controls for selecting the best signal representation of a gas turbine engine parameter from among the sample values of two sensed signals representative of the parameter actual value, and a synthesized signal representative of the parameter nominal value, comprising: signal comparison means, responsive to the sampled values of each of the two sensed signals, for comparing each sample value to maximum and minimum performance value limits established for the parameter, and for rejecting those sensed signal samples which exceed these limits; and signal selection means, responsive to the nonrejected sensed signal samples from said signal comparison means for determining the difference signal magnitude between the sampled actual parameter value and the nominal value of the synthesized signal, for rejecting each previously nonrejected sensed signal sample having said difference value greater than a selected maximum, for selecting a nonrejected sensed signal sample as the parameter value in the presence of nonrejected samples, and for selecting the synthesized signal as the parameter value in the absence of nonrejected sensed signal samples.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
51 words
The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said signal comparison means includes: magnitude comparator means, responsive to each of the sensed signal samples, for comparing each sample magnitude to maximum and minimum magnitude limits established for the parameter, and for rejecting each sample value having a magnitude outside of these magnitude limits.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
79 words
The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said signal comparison means includes: rate comparator means, responsive to successive sample values of each of the sensed signals, for determining the rate of change in succeeding sample values, for comparing the determined rate of change for each sample of each sensed signal with maximum and minimum rate of change limits established for the parameter, and for rejecting each sample value having a rate of change outside of these rate of change limits.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
119 words
The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said signal selection means further comprises: counting means, responsive to consecutive rejected and nonrejected samples of each of said sensed signals, counting means, responsive to consecutive rejected and nonrejected samples of each of said sensed signals, for identifying each occurrence of a rejected sample value as a plural count and for identifying each occurrence of a nonrejected sample as a single count, for providing a sum count signal by adding said plural count rejections and subtracting said single count nonrejections, and for rejecting from use for an extended interval any one of said sensed signals with a sample sum count signal having a sum greater than zero for a selected period of time.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-01-26 | 1990-07-28 | 1991-01-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-01-26 | 1994-07-28 | 1995-01-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-01-26 | 1998-07-28 | 1999-01-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |