US4637054A — Inspecting articles

Claim 1

Independent Claim 85 words

A method for comparing the condition of an article at different times before and after subjecting the article to some operation, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of the article before the said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of the article after the said operation, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 2

Independent Claim 85 words

A method for comparing the condition of an article at different times before and after subjecting the article to some operation, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of the article before the said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of the article after the said operation, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 3

Independent Claim 91 words

A method for repeatedly comparing the condition of an article at different times before and after subjecting the article to each operation of a succession of operations, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of the article before each said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of the article after each said operation, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected, and (d) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 4

Independent Claim 91 words

A method for repeatedly comparing the condition of an article at different times before and after subjecting the article to each operation of a succession of operations, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of the article before each said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of the article after each said operation, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected, and (d) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 5

Independent Claim 96 words

A method for comparing the condition of a succession of articles at different times before and after subjecting said articles to operations, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of each article before subjecting it to its said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of each article after subjecting it to its said operation, (d) predetermining for each article what differences between said first and said second images would be significant if detected, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 6

Independent Claim 96 words

A method for comparing the condition of a succession of articles at different times before and after subjecting said articles to operations, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of each article before subjecting it to its said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of each article after subjecting it to its said operation, (d) predetermining for each article what differences between said first and said second images would be significant if detected, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 7

Independent Claim 90 words

A method for comparing the condition of a tool at different times before and after performing an operation on a workpiece, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of said tool before said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of said tool after said operation, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected to indicate that the tool is damaged, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 8

Independent Claim 90 words

A method for comparing the condition of a tool at different times before and after performing an operation on a workpiece, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of said tool before said operation, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of said tool after said operation, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected to indicate that the tool is damaged, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 9

Independent Claim 108 words

A method for comparing the condition of tools on a multihead tool array at different times before and after performing operations of a workpiece, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of the tools on each head of said tool array before the operation of said tools, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of the said tools after said operation thereof, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected to indicate that any tool is damaged during said operation, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 10

Independent Claim 108 words

A method for comparing the condition of tools on a multihead tool array at different times before and after performing operations of a workpiece, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first image of the tools on each head of said tool array before the operation of said tools, (b) storing said first image, (c) forming a second image of the said tools after said operation thereof, (d) predetermining what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected to indicate that any tool is damaged during said operation, and (e) comparing said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 11

Independent Claim 92 words

A method according to any of claims 1 to 5, in which said first and second images are video images comprised of pixels, the first image at least being digitised and enhanced, further comprising the steps of (a) detecting by a suitable algorithm areas of interest such as edges and assigning weights to pixels thereby, (b) forming a database from the said first image which is representative of such areas of interest, and (c) computing from said database the probability that said second image is not significantly different from said first image.

Claim 12

Dependent Claim 97 words

Apparatus for comparing the condition of an article at different times before and after subjecting the article to some operation, comprising (a) imaging means adapted to form first and second images of said article, before and after said operation respectively, (b) image store means adapted to receive and store said first image from said imaging means, (c) difference significance determining means adapted to predetermine what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected, and (d) comparator means adapted to compare said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 13

Dependent Claim 97 words

Apparatus for comparing the condition of an article at different times before and after subjecting the article to some operation, comprising (a) imaging means adapted to form first and second images of said article, before and after said operation respectively, (b) image store means adapted to receive and store said first image from said imaging means, (c) difference significance determining means adapted to predetermine what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected, and (d) comparator means adapted to compare said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 14

Dependent Claim 104 words

Apparatus for comparing the condition of a tool at different times before and after performing an operation on a workpiece, comprising (a) imaging means adapted to form first and second images of said tool before and after said operations respectively, (b) image store means adapted to receive and store said first image from said imaging means, (c) difference significance determining means adapted to predetermine what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected to indicate that the tool is damaged, and (d) comparator means adapted to compare said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 15

Dependent Claim 104 words

Apparatus for comparing the condition of a tool at different times before and after performing an operation on a workpiece, comprising (a) imaging means adapted to form first and second images of said tool before and after said operations respectively, (b) image store means adapted to receive and store said first image from said imaging means, (c) difference significance determining means adapted to predetermine what differences between said first and second images would be significant if detected to indicate that the tool is damaged, and (d) comparator means adapted to compare said stored first and said second images automatically to detect such significant differences.

Claim 16

Dependent Claim 38 words

Apparatus according to claim 8, in combination with a tool head, said imaging means being located at an inspection position for a tool in said head to which position said head is brought before and after said operation.

Claim 17

Dependent Claim 96 words

Apparatus according to claim 9, in which said comparator means comprise data processing means adapted to detect edges or areas of interest in a video image and programmed to assign weights to pixels of such image according to an assigned probability of their representing areas of interest and forming a database from the said first image which is representative of preselected areas of interest in the article imaged, and computing means programmed to compute from said database and from said second image the probability that the second image is not significantly different from the first image.

Claim 18

Dependent Claim 34 words

Apparatus according to claim 9, said data processing means being adapted to form said database in such short time as it takes the tool head to return to said inspection position after said operation.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	1990-01-12	1990-07-14	1991-01-13	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	1994-01-12	1994-07-14	1995-01-13	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	1998-01-12	1998-07-14	1999-01-13	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

Inspecting articles

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag