← Back to Patent Explorer
US4635259A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and apparatus for monitoring response signals during automated testing of electronic circuits

Assignee: FAIRCILD CAMERA & INSTRUMENT Corp 464 ELLIS STREET MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94042
•
Filing: 1984-05-17
•
Granted: 1987-01-06
•
Expires: 2004-05-17
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A plurality of test signal applying and response signal monitoring circuits is coupled to pins of an electronic device being tested to force test stimuli signals onto input pins of the device under test. The response signals are monitored while the device is being tested. Each test signal applying and response signal monitoring circuit includes a node to be coupled to a pin of the device under test, a digitally programmed source for supplying a test signal connectable to the node by a first switch, and a comparison circuit connected to the node by a second switch for indicating the relative magnitude of the response signal with respect to a programmed reference level on a repetitive basis during testing to increase test rate. Other features are also disclosed.

Inventors

  • 👤 John Schinabeck
  • 👤 James R. Murdock

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-24 05:39
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/317; G01R31/3181; G01R31/319; G01R31/31917; G01R31/31922; G01R31/31712; G01R31/31713; G01R31/31903; G01R31/31908; G01R31/3191; G01R31/31928; G01R31/3193; G01R31/31935; G01R31/31937; H; H03; H03K; H03K5/00; H03K5/13; H03K5/131; H03K5/14; G01R31/31926; H03K2005/00013; H03K2005/0015; H03K2005/00234; H03K2005/00247; H03K2005/00254; H03K2005/0026

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim 103 words
A method for repeatedly monitoring the response signal at a node of a deivce under test caused by a test signal applied to the node by digitally programmed source means switchably connected by a first switch means to the node and comparison means switchably connected by a second switch means to the node, the method comprising the steps of: connecting the test signal to the node; repetitively comparing the response signal voltage and current with programmed reference voltage and current levels; and repetitively providing an indication of the relative magnitude of the response signal voltage and current with respect tothe programmed reference levels.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 103 words
A method for repeatedly monitoring the response signal at a node of a deivce under test caused by a test signal applied to the node by digitally programmed source means switchably connected by a first switch means to the node and comparison means switchably connected by a second switch means to the node, the method comprising the steps of: connecting the test signal to the node; repetitively comparing the response signal voltage and current with programmed reference voltage and current levels; and repetitively providing an indication of the relative magnitude of the response signal voltage and current with respect tothe programmed reference levels.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 75 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: continuing to apply the test signal to and to monitor the response signal at the node in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a first predetermined relationship with respect to the programmed reference levels; and providing a fail signal in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a second predetermined relationship with respect to the programmed reference levels.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 77 words
Apparatus for applying a test signal to and monitoring a response signal at a node of a device under test, comprising: digitally programmed source means switchably connected by a first switch means to the node for supplying test signals to the node; and comparison means switchably connected by a second switch means to the node for indicating the relative magnitude of the response signal voltage and current with respect to programmed reference levels on a repetitive basis.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 77 words
Apparatus for applying a test signal to and monitoring a response signal at a node of a device under test, comprising: digitally programmed source means switchably connected by a first switch means to the node for supplying test signals to the node; and comparison means switchably connected by a second switch means to the node for indicating the relative magnitude of the response signal voltage and current with respect to programmed reference levels on a repetitive basis.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 108 words
Apparatus as in claim 3, further comprising: control means connected to the digitally programmed source means and comparison means for continuing to cause the digitally programmed source means to apply the test signal to and the comparison means to monitor the response signal voltage and current at the node in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a first predetermined relationship with respect to the programmed reference levels; and means connected to the comparison means and control means for providing a fail signal in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a second predetermined relationship with respect to the programmed reference levels.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 15 words
Apparatus as in claim 3 wherein the switch means are controlled by a computer means.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 12 words
Apparatus as in claim 5 wherein the switch means comprise reed relays.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 14 words
Apparatus as in claim 5 wherein the computer means comprises a test system controller.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 261 words
A method for repeatedly monitoring the response signal at a node of a device under test caused by a test signal applied to the node by digitally programmed source means having a preselected programmed voltage-current characteristic defined by not-to-exceed voltage rail and current rail levels switchably connected by a first switch means to the node and comparison means switchably connected by a second switch means to the node, the method comprising the steps of: connecting the test signal to the node; repetitively comparing the response signal voltage at the node with a first programmed voltage level; repetitively comparing the response signal voltage at the node with a second programmed voltage level; repetitively comparing the response signal current at the node with a first programmed current level; repetitively comparing the response signal current at the node with a second programmed current level; repetitively providing an indication of the relative amplitude of the response signal voltage and current with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively; continuing to apply the test signal to and to monitor the response signal at the node in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a first predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively; and providing a fail signal in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a second predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 261 words
A method for repeatedly monitoring the response signal at a node of a device under test caused by a test signal applied to the node by digitally programmed source means having a preselected programmed voltage-current characteristic defined by not-to-exceed voltage rail and current rail levels switchably connected by a first switch means to the node and comparison means switchably connected by a second switch means to the node, the method comprising the steps of: connecting the test signal to the node; repetitively comparing the response signal voltage at the node with a first programmed voltage level; repetitively comparing the response signal voltage at the node with a second programmed voltage level; repetitively comparing the response signal current at the node with a first programmed current level; repetitively comparing the response signal current at the node with a second programmed current level; repetitively providing an indication of the relative amplitude of the response signal voltage and current with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively; continuing to apply the test signal to and to monitor the response signal at the node in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a first predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively; and providing a fail signal in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a second predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the test signal is a forcing function which starts at zero volts and one percent of the maximum current of a preselected voltage-current range.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 326 words
Apparatus for repeatedly monitoring the response signal at a node of a device under test caused by a test signal applied to the node, comprising: digitally programmed source means switchably connected by a first switch means to the node, the digitally programmed source means having a preselected programmed voltage-current characteristic defined by not-to-exceed voltage rail and current rail levels for supplying test signals to the node; first comparison mean switchably connected by a second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal voltage at the node with respect to a first programmed voltage level; second comparison means switchably connected by the second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal voltage at the node with respect to a second programmed voltage level; third comparison means switchably connected by the second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal current at the node with respect to a first programmed current level; fourth comparison means switchably connected by the second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal current at the node with respect to a second programmed current level; control means connected to the digitally programmed source means and comparison means for continuing to cause the digitally programmed source means to apply the test signal to and the comparison means to monitor the response signal at the node in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a first predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively; and means connected to the comparison means and control means for providing a fail signal in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a second predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 326 words
Apparatus for repeatedly monitoring the response signal at a node of a device under test caused by a test signal applied to the node, comprising: digitally programmed source means switchably connected by a first switch means to the node, the digitally programmed source means having a preselected programmed voltage-current characteristic defined by not-to-exceed voltage rail and current rail levels for supplying test signals to the node; first comparison mean switchably connected by a second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal voltage at the node with respect to a first programmed voltage level; second comparison means switchably connected by the second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal voltage at the node with respect to a second programmed voltage level; third comparison means switchably connected by the second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal current at the node with respect to a first programmed current level; fourth comparison means switchably connected by the second switch means to the node for repetitively indicating the relative amplitude of the response signal current at the node with respect to a second programmed current level; control means connected to the digitally programmed source means and comparison means for continuing to cause the digitally programmed source means to apply the test signal to and the comparison means to monitor the response signal at the node in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a first predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively; and means connected to the comparison means and control means for providing a fail signal in the event that the response signal voltage and current have a second predetermined relationship with respect to the first and second programmed voltage levels and first and second programmed current levels, respectively.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 44 words
Apparatus as in claim 10 wherein the digitally programmed source means is a crossover source which supplies a test signal in the form of a forcing function that starts at zero volts and one percent of the maximum current of a preselected voltage-current range.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3657527A Cited
US4055801A Cited
US4044244A Cited
US4070565A Cited
US4168527A Cited
US4271515A Cited
US4439858A Cited
US4523312A Cited
US4517512A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1990-01-05 1990-07-07 1991-01-06 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1994-01-05 1994-07-07 1995-01-06 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1998-01-05 1998-07-07 1999-01-06 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag