US4630285A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for reducing group delay distortion
Assignee: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY United States, AS REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR
•
Filing: 1985-03-18
•
Granted: 1986-12-16
•
Expires: 2005-03-18
Abstract
Abstract A method is disclosed for eliminating group delay distortion resulting from filtering an information-carrying analog signal. The method allows an analog signal to be converted to digital form and back again with zero group delay distortion. The analog signal is first band or low pass filtered with a filter having a pass band substantially larger than that required to filter only the signal of interest. The filtered signal is then digitized at a rate appropriate to the filtered signal, digitally filtered to remove all but the signal of interest, and down sampled to the transmission rate. A substantially reversed process is described for reconverting the digital signal to analog form. The method is shown to be equally effective with a multiplexed signal.
Inventors
- 👤 James W. Dyer
- 👤 Raymond R. Watkins
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-03 11:30
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04B; H04B14/00; H04B14/02; H04B14/04; H04J; H04J1/00; H04J1/02; H04J1/10
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
225 words
A process for reducing group delay distortion in an analog signal communication, comprising: (a) filtering a first analog signal, a predetermined portion of which comprises a signal of interest, with a low pass filter having a cutoff frequency substantially greater than the signal of interest, said frequency being at least that necessary to preclude group delay distortion in said signal of interest; (b) converting said filtered analog signal to digital form at a rate equal to or greater than two times the filtered signal bandwidth; (c) filtering said digital signal with a digital filter having a cutoff frequency substantially equal to the signal of interest; (d) down sampling said filtered digital signal to a transmission sample rate approximately equal to twice the bandwidth of the signal of interest; (e) up sampling said down sampled signal to a rate equal to or greater than two times the transmission sample rate; (f) filtering said up sampled signal with a digital filter having a cutoff frequency substantially equal to the signal of interest; (g) digital-to-analog converting said filtered up sampled signal to produce a second analog signal; and (h) filtering said second analog signal with an analog low pass filter having a cutoff frequency substantially greater than the signal of interest, said frequency being at least that necessary to preclude group delay distortion in said signal of interest.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
225 words
A process for reducing group delay distortion in an analog signal communication, comprising: (a) filtering a first analog signal, a predetermined portion of which comprises a signal of interest, with a low pass filter having a cutoff frequency substantially greater than the signal of interest, said frequency being at least that necessary to preclude group delay distortion in said signal of interest; (b) converting said filtered analog signal to digital form at a rate equal to or greater than two times the filtered signal bandwidth; (c) filtering said digital signal with a digital filter having a cutoff frequency substantially equal to the signal of interest; (d) down sampling said filtered digital signal to a transmission sample rate approximately equal to twice the bandwidth of the signal of interest; (e) up sampling said down sampled signal to a rate equal to or greater than two times the transmission sample rate; (f) filtering said up sampled signal with a digital filter having a cutoff frequency substantially equal to the signal of interest; (g) digital-to-analog converting said filtered up sampled signal to produce a second analog signal; and (h) filtering said second analog signal with an analog low pass filter having a cutoff frequency substantially greater than the signal of interest, said frequency being at least that necessary to preclude group delay distortion in said signal of interest.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
23 words
The proces of claim 1, wherein the pass band of said first analog filter is at least twice the bandwidth of the signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claim 2, wherein filtering said digital signal includes filtering said digital signal with a finite impulse response filter.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
113 words
An improved process for converting a digital signal having a given bit rate to an analog signal of a given bandwidth without introducing group delay distortion, comprising the steps of: (a) up sampling said digital signal to a rate substantially greater than said given bit rate; (b) filtering said upsampled digital signal with a digital filter having a pass band substantially equal to said given bandwidth; (c) convering said filtered digital signal to an analog signal; and (d) filtering said analog signal with an analog filter having a pass band substantially greater than said given bandwidth, said pass band being at least that necessary to preclude group delay distortion in said analog signal.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
113 words
An improved process for converting a digital signal having a given bit rate to an analog signal of a given bandwidth without introducing group delay distortion, comprising the steps of: (a) up sampling said digital signal to a rate substantially greater than said given bit rate; (b) filtering said upsampled digital signal with a digital filter having a pass band substantially equal to said given bandwidth; (c) convering said filtered digital signal to an analog signal; and (d) filtering said analog signal with an analog filter having a pass band substantially greater than said given bandwidth, said pass band being at least that necessary to preclude group delay distortion in said analog signal.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
23 words
The process of claim 4, wherein the bit rate of said up sampled digital signal is at least twice said given bit rate.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claim 5, wherein filtering said digital signal includes filtering said digital signal with a finite impulse response filter.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2669608A
Cited
US3404231A
Cited
US3629509A
Cited
US4032762A
Cited
US4093989A
Cited
US4317129A
Cited
US4520386A
Cited
US4468794A
Cited
US4463371A
Cited
US4534043A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-12-15 | 1990-06-16 | 1990-12-16 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-12-15 | 1994-06-16 | 1994-12-16 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-12-15 | 1998-06-16 | 1998-12-16 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |