← Back to Patent Explorer
US4613346A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Energy control for electrostatic precipitator

Assignee: F L SMIDTH and Co
•
Filing: 1985-09-25
•
Granted: 1986-09-23
•
Expires: 2005-09-25
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract To control an electrostatic precipitator towards minimum energy consumption at a given efficiency the dust content in the exit air of the precipitator is measured and the efficiency of the precipitator regulated upwardly or downwardly accordingly. Regulation is carried out in accordance with a selected one of a plurality of predefined stored strategies by a central unit which controls the parameters of the independent power supplies to the precipitator sections.

Inventors

  • 👤 Victor Reyes
  • 👤 Eigil Kristensen

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 10:26
CPC Classifications
B; B03; B03C; B03C3/00; B03C3/34; B03C3/66; B03C3/68

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim 215 words
A method of controlling an electrostatic precipitator for reducing the dust content of exit gas from a plant which includes one or more precipitator sections, said method comprising charging each of said sections from a separate independent power supply for supplying a controllable high DC-voltage thereto, superimposing on said DC-voltage controllable high voltage pulses at a controllable repetition frequency, controlling the entire electrostatic precipitator towards minimum energy consumption at a certain set dedusting efficiency, by measuring the dust content in the exit gas from the entire precipitator and regulating the dedusting efficiency of the entire precipitator upwardly or downwardly depending on whether said measured dust content is above or below a preset value, the regulation being made through controlling the running parameters of one or more of the power supplies within set limits according to a control strategy selected among a plurality of predefined stored control strategies, each said control strategy comprising a sequence of instructions as to in what order, in which way and within which limits the DC-voltage, the pulse voltage and the pulse frequency of the respective power supplies of said precipitator sections are regulated, said dust content measurement determining if the instructions should be followed in forward or in reverse order, and how far the sequence of instructions should be followed.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 215 words
A method of controlling an electrostatic precipitator for reducing the dust content of exit gas from a plant which includes one or more precipitator sections, said method comprising charging each of said sections from a separate independent power supply for supplying a controllable high DC-voltage thereto, superimposing on said DC-voltage controllable high voltage pulses at a controllable repetition frequency, controlling the entire electrostatic precipitator towards minimum energy consumption at a certain set dedusting efficiency, by measuring the dust content in the exit gas from the entire precipitator and regulating the dedusting efficiency of the entire precipitator upwardly or downwardly depending on whether said measured dust content is above or below a preset value, the regulation being made through controlling the running parameters of one or more of the power supplies within set limits according to a control strategy selected among a plurality of predefined stored control strategies, each said control strategy comprising a sequence of instructions as to in what order, in which way and within which limits the DC-voltage, the pulse voltage and the pulse frequency of the respective power supplies of said precipitator sections are regulated, said dust content measurement determining if the instructions should be followed in forward or in reverse order, and how far the sequence of instructions should be followed.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 1, in which said strategy selection takes place manually.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 1 in which said strategy selection is influenced by process parameters of the plant the exit gas of which the precipitator dedusts.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method of claim 1 in which said strategy selection is influenced by measured values of one or more continuously measured precipitator parameters.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 43 words
The method of claim 1 in which the strategy for the down-regulation of the efficiency of the precipitator is arranged so that regulation is always effected on the power supply parameter giving the smallest reduction of the efficiency for a given energy saving.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 1, in which the strategy for up-regulation of the efficiency of the precipitator is arranged so that regulation is always made on the power supply parameter giving the largest increase of the efficiency for a given increase in energy consumption.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 48 words
The method of claim 1, in which one of the stored strategies when down-regulating efficiency comprises the following steps in turn: a. down-regulation of the pulse repetition frequency to a set limit, b. down-regulation of the pulse voltage to a set limit, and c. down-regulation of the DC-voltage.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method according to claim 7, characterized in that the steps determined by the strategy when up-regulating the efficiency are executed in reverse order to the steps when down-regulating efficiency.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 62 words
The method of claim 1, in which one of the stored strategies when down-regulating the efficiency of the precipitator comprises the following steps in turn: a. down-regulation of the DC-voltage to a set value, b. down-regulation of the pulse repetition frequency to a set limit, c. down-regulation of the pulse voltage to a set limit, and d. further down-regulation of the DC-voltage.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method according to claim 9, characterized in that the steps determined by the strategy when up-regulating the efficiency are executed in reverse order to the steps when down-regulating efficiency.
Claim 12
Independent Claim 33 words
The method of any of claims 1 to 9, wherein said control strategy is made from a central unit and defined by a selected one of a plurality of predefined stored control strategies.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

EP0030321A1 Cited
US4284417A Cited
US4432061A Cited
EP0044488A1 Cited
US4413225A Cited
EP0054378A1 Cited
EP0055525A1 Cited
US4445911A Cited
US4410849A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1989-09-22 1990-03-24 1990-09-23 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1993-09-22 1994-03-24 1994-09-23 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1997-09-22 1998-03-24 1998-09-23 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag