US4606633A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Test method for evaluating faults on printed sheets and webs and apparatus for performing the method
Assignee: Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
•
Filing: 1978-07-14
•
Granted: 1986-08-19
•
Expires: 1998-07-14
Abstract
Abstract Method of evaluating faults on printed sheets by means of a reflectance meter and test fields which includes: detecting by a measuring technique reflectance values of four test fields one of which is a full tone field and the other three are line screen test fields having screen lines disposed at varying angles yet exhibiting equal screen width and equal screen tone values in the film, mathematically determining the screen tone value in a print, deducting any effect of slip and mackling from the measured four reflectance values or from the screen tone values in the three line screen test fields ascertainable therefrom; and selectively indicating these values.
Inventors
- 👤 Willi Jeschke
- 👤 Gerhard Loffler
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 07:32
CPC Classifications
B; B41; B41F; B41F33/00; B41F33/0036; B41P; B41P2233/00; B41P2233/50; B41P2233/51; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S101/00; Y10S101/36
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
111 words
Method of evaluating faults on printed sheets which comprises: printing four test fields one of which is a full tone field and the other three are line screen test fields having screen lines disposed at varying angles yet exhibiting equal screen width and equal screen tone values in an ink film from which the test fields are printed, detecting reflectance values of the test fields by a measuring technique, mathematically determining the screen tone value in a print, deducting any effect of slip and mackling from the measured four reflectance values or from the screen tone values in the three line screen test fields ascertainable therefrom; and selectively indicating these values.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
111 words
Method of evaluating faults on printed sheets which comprises: printing four test fields one of which is a full tone field and the other three are line screen test fields having screen lines disposed at varying angles yet exhibiting equal screen width and equal screen tone values in an ink film from which the test fields are printed, detecting reflectance values of the test fields by a measuring technique, mathematically determining the screen tone value in a print, deducting any effect of slip and mackling from the measured four reflectance values or from the screen tone values in the three line screen test fields ascertainable therefrom; and selectively indicating these values.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
42 words
Method according to claim 1 which comprises approximately determining percentage magnitude of slip and mackling as a difference between maximal screen tone value determined in one of the three line screen test fields and the screen tone value determined in the print.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
46 words
Method according to claim 1 which comprises precisely determining the percentage value of slip and mackling by mathematically combining the four measured reflectance values or the screen tone values in the three line screen test fields determinable therefrom while simultaneously determining slip or mackling direction angle.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
81 words
Apparatus for evaluating faults on printed sheets and webs comprising four test fields combined into a test field block upon a sheet or web being tested, one of said test fields being a full tone field and the other three being line screen test fields having different screen angles, reflectance meter means for measuring the test fields, computer means for processing measured reflectance values fed thereto from said reflectance meter, and indicating means for indicating values calculated in said computer means.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
81 words
Apparatus for evaluating faults on printed sheets and webs comprising four test fields combined into a test field block upon a sheet or web being tested, one of said test fields being a full tone field and the other three being line screen test fields having different screen angles, reflectance meter means for measuring the test fields, computer means for processing measured reflectance values fed thereto from said reflectance meter, and indicating means for indicating values calculated in said computer means.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
47 words
Apparatus according to claim 4 including an additional line screen field in said test field block, said additional line screen field having a width smaller than that of said first-mentioned three line screen test fields and being disposed between two of said three line screen test fields.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
Apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said three line screen test fields have respective screen angles differing equally from one another by 120°.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
37 words
Apparatus according to claim 4 wherein the lines of one of said three line screen test fields extend parallel to a front edge of the sheet as disposed for performance of the method thereon in the apparatus.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
Apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said indicating means comprise an instrument for indicating percentage value of at least one of slip and mackling, preselective tolerances having been taken into consideration.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
37 words
Apparatus according to claim 4 wherein at least one of the screen angles included by the screen lines of the three line screen test fields is within a range of angles of greater than 90° to 60°.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
94 words
Method according to claim 3 wherein the screen tone value in the print, with any effect of slip and mackling deducted therefrom, is exactly equal to the sum of the determined screen tone value, with any effect of slip and mackling included therein, of the two line screen test fields having the lowest values of the three line screen test fields, minus the determined screen tone value, with any effect of slip and mackling included therein, of the third line screen test field having the highest value of the three line screen test fields.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
62 words
Method according to claim 3 wherein, in an approximation method, an increase in screen tone value due to the effect of slip and mackling is substantially equal to the determined screen tone value of that line screen test field having the highest value minus the previously determined screen tone value in the print, with any effect of slip and mackling excluded therefrom.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-08-18 | 1990-02-17 | 1990-08-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-08-18 | 1994-02-17 | 1994-08-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-08-18 | 1998-02-17 | 1998-08-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |