US4564910A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and algorithms therefore for monitoring the performance of a tool and modifying the feed rate thereof
Assignee: Eaton Corp
•
Filing: 1983-04-25
•
Granted: 1986-01-14
•
Expires: 2003-04-25
Abstract
Abstract A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle and controlling the feed rate between the tool and the workpiece includes the steps of dividing the cycle into a plurality of increments, sensing a function of force applied to the tool during the increments, determining a mathematically smoothed function of force for the function of force for each sensed individual increment of the cycle and establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force for each of the sensed increments. The actual determined sensed mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular increment is compared with the established reference for that particular increment and a first signal is generated if the actual determined mathematically smoothed function of force deviates from the established reference. The feed rate between the tool and workpiece is modified in dependence upon the first signal.
Inventors
- 👤 Stanley K. Smith
- 👤 Donald J. Rozsi
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 19:55
CPC Classifications
B; B23; B23Q; B23Q15/00; B23Q15/007; B23Q15/12; G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/18; G05B19/406; G05B19/4065; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/30; G05B2219/37; G05B2219/37233; G05B2219/37344; G05B2219/37499; G05B2219/37525; G05B2219/37542; G05B2219/37543; G05B2219/49; G05B2219/49062
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 32
Claim 1
Independent Claim
49 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle and controlling the feed rate between the tool and workpiece in response to the monitored performance of the tool comprising the steps of: dividing said cycle into a plurality of increments:
Claim 2
Independent Claim
49 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle and controlling the feed rate between the tool and workpiece in response to the monitored performance of the tool comprising the steps of: dividing said cycle into a plurality of increments:
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
58 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 when said step of establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force includes the step of: establish an acceptable range for the determined mathematically smoothed function of force for each sensed individual increment.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
68 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 2 wherein said step of establishing an acceptable range for the mathematically smoothed function of force includes the step of establishing a high limit for the mathematically smoothed function of force and a low limit for the mathematically smoothed function of force for each sensed increment.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force includes the step of; establishing an optimum mathematically smoothed function of force for each sensed individual increment.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
169 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force includes the step of; establishing an optimum acceptable range for the gradient of the mathematically smoothed function of force. sensing a function of the force applied to said tool during said increments; determining a mathematically smoothed function of force for said sensed function of force for each sensed individual increment of said cycle; establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force for each of said sensed increments; comparing said determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular sensed increment with said established reference for that particular increment; generating a first signal if said actual determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular increment deviates from the established reference for that particular increment; and modifying the feed rate between the tool and workpiece in dependence on said first signal.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
71 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 5 wherein said step of establishing an acceptable range for the gradient of the mathematically smoothed function of force includes the step of estabishing a maximum gradient for the mathematically smoothed function of force and a minimum gradient for the mathematically smoothed function of force for each sensed increment.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
52 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force includes the step of; establishing an optimum gradient for the mathematically smoothed function of force.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
72 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of generating said first signal comprises the step of generating a first signal only if the deviation between the actual determined mathematically smoothed function of force and the established reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force is of a predetermined magnitude for a particular increment.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
99 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said first signal has a first characteristic when said actual determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular increment is less than said established reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force for that particular increment and said first signal has a second characteristic when said actual determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular increment is greater than said established reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force for that particular increment.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
82 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 9 further including the steps of: modifying the feed rate between said cutting tool and workpiece in a first sense in response to a first signal having said first characteristic; and modifying the feed rate between said cutting tool and said workpiece in a second sense, opposite said first sense, in response to a first signal having said second characteristic.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
86 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 9 wherein said step of modifying the feed rate in response to a first signal having said first characteristic includes the step of increasing the feed rate between said cutting tool and workpiece and said step of modifying the feed rate in response to a first signal having said second characteristics including the step of decreasing the feed rate between said tool and workpiece.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
52 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of modifying the feed rate includes the step of terminating the cycle between the tool and workpiece in response to the generation of said first signal.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
48 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of sensing a function of the force applied to said tool includes the step of sensing the torque applied to said tool.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
48 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of sensing a function of the force applied to said tool includes the step of sensing the thrust applied to said tool.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
49 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of sensing a function of the force applied to said tool includes the step of sensing the separation force applied to said tool.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
49 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of sensing a function of the force applied to said tool includes the step of sensing the feed force applied to said tool.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
46 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of modifying the feed rate between said tool and said workpiece operates to maintain a proper finish on said workpiece.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
215 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle and controlling the feed rate between the tool and workpiece in response to the monitored performance of the tool comprising the steps of: dividing said cycle into a plurality of increments: sensing a function of the force applied to said tool during said increments; determining a mathematically smoothed function of force for said sensed function of force for each sensed individual increment of said cycle; establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force for each of said sensed increments; comparing said determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular sensed increment with said established reference for that particular increment; generating a first signal if said actual determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular increment deviates from the established reference for that particular increment; and modifying the feed rate between the tool and workpiece in dependence on said first signal; wherein said step of determining a mathematically smoothed function of force for the sensed function of force includes the steps of determining the cumulative percentage deviation for the sensed function of force for each sensed individual increment of said cycle; and determining a cumulative percentage deviation data point for each sensed individual increment.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
215 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle and controlling the feed rate between the tool and workpiece in response to the monitored performance of the tool comprising the steps of: dividing said cycle into a plurality of increments: sensing a function of the force applied to said tool during said increments; determining a mathematically smoothed function of force for said sensed function of force for each sensed individual increment of said cycle; establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force for each of said sensed increments; comparing said determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular sensed increment with said established reference for that particular increment; generating a first signal if said actual determined mathematically smoothed function of force for a particular increment deviates from the established reference for that particular increment; and modifying the feed rate between the tool and workpiece in dependence on said first signal; wherein said step of determining a mathematically smoothed function of force for the sensed function of force includes the steps of determining the cumulative percentage deviation for the sensed function of force for each sensed individual increment of said cycle; and determining a cumulative percentage deviation data point for each sensed individual increment.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 18 wherein said step of establishing a reference for the mathematically smoothed function of force comprises establishing a reference for the cumulative percentage deviation data point for each of said sensed increments.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 19 wherein said step of establishing a reference for the cumulative percentage deviation data point includes the step of; establishing an optimum cumulative percentage deviation data point for each sensed individual increment.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
71 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 20 wherein said step of determining a cumulative percentage deviation data point for a particular increment includes the step of adding the absolute value of the percentage deviation for that particular increment to the sum of the absolute values of the sensed percentage deviation for the previously sensed increments.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 19 wherein said step of establishing a reference for cumulative percentage deviation data point includes the step of; establishing an optimum acceptable range for the gradient of the cumulative percentage deviation data points.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
71 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 22 wherein said step of establishing an acceptable range for the gradient of the cumulative percentage deviation data points includes the step of establishing a maximum gradient for the cumulative percentage deviation data points and a minimum gradient for the cumulative percentage deviation data points for each sensed increment.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
51 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 19 wherein said step of establishing a reference for cumulative percentage deviation data point includes the step of; establishing an optimum gradient for the cumulative percentage deviation data points.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
72 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 19 wherein said step of generating said first signal comprises the step of generating a first signal only if the deviation between the actual determined cumulative percentage deviation data point and the established reference for the cumulative percentage deviation data point is of a predetermined magnitude for a particular increment.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
99 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 19 wherein said first signal has a first characteristic when said actual determined cumulative percentage deviation data point for a particular increment is less than said established reference for the cumulative percentage deviation data point for that particular increment and said first signal has a second characteristic when said actual determined cumulative percentage deviation data point for a particular increment is greater than said established reference for the cumulative percentage deviation data point for that particular increment.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
81 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 26 including the steps of: modifying the feed rate between said cutting tool and workpiece in a first sense in response to a first signal having said first characteristic; and modifying the feed rate between said cutting tool and said workpiece in a second sense, opposite said first sense, in response to a first signal having said second characteristic.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
86 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 26 wherein said step of modifying the feed rate in response to a first signal having said first characteristic includes the step of increasing the feed rate between said cutting tool and workpiece and said step of modifying the feed rate in response to a first signal having said second charateristics including the step of decreasing the feed rate between said tool and workpiece.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
58 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 18 when said step of establishing a reference for the cumulative percentage deviation data point includes the step of: establishing an acceptable range for the determined cumulative percentage deviation data point for each sensed individual increment.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
65 words
A method of monitoring the performance of a tool which moves relative to a workpiece through a cycle as defined in claim 29 wherein said step of establishing an acceptable range for the determined cumulative percentage deviation data points includes the step of establishing a high limit cumulative percentage deviation data point and a low limit cumulative percentage deviation data point for each sensed increment.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3596544A
Cited
US3699318A
Cited
US3715946A
Cited
US3834615A
Cited
US3836834A
Cited
US4322669A
Cited
US4207567A
Cited
US4260986A
Cited
US4326257A
Cited
US4237408A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-01-13 | 1989-07-15 | 1990-01-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-01-13 | 1993-07-15 | 1994-01-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-01-13 | 1997-07-15 | 1998-01-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |