Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
174 words
A method of performing a task as a sequence of called activities in multiple digital processors which operate asynchronously to each other; said method including the steps of: executing a portion of a first activity of said sequence in a first processor, said portion including and ending with an INTERPROCESSOR CALL instruction; suspending execution of the first activity in response to said INTERPROCESSOR CALL and signaling a second processor that a second activity has been called by the first activity; completely executing the second activity in the second processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR CALL and further executing an INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction which references a third activity in a third processor; signaling the third processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction that said third activity has been called not by said second activity but by whatever activity happened to call the second activity; and completely executing said third activity in said third processor and, upon completion thereof, signaling said third activity's apparent caller as indicated by said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction, to resume execution.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
174 words
A method of performing a task as a sequence of called activities in multiple digital processors which operate asynchronously to each other; said method including the steps of: executing a portion of a first activity of said sequence in a first processor, said portion including and ending with an INTERPROCESSOR CALL instruction; suspending execution of the first activity in response to said INTERPROCESSOR CALL and signaling a second processor that a second activity has been called by the first activity; completely executing the second activity in the second processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR CALL and further executing an INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction which references a third activity in a third processor; signaling the third processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction that said third activity has been called not by said second activity but by whatever activity happened to call the second activity; and completely executing said third activity in said third processor and, upon completion thereof, signaling said third activity's apparent caller as indicated by said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction, to resume execution.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
A method according to claim 1 and further including the step of signaling said second processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction to re-execute said second activity if it is called again by yet another activity even while said third activity is being executed by said third processor.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method according to claim 1 and further including the steps of: providing each activity with a queue containing pointers to the respective caller of that activity; and moving the caller pointer from the queue of the second activity into the queue of the third activity in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 3 and further including the step of limiting access to said queues such that said pointers are loaded and unloaded during multiple cycles by only one of said processors at a time.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method according to claim 1 and further including the step of executing another activity in said first processor while said first activity is suspended.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
200 words
A data processing system including first, second and third digital processors which operate asynchronously to each other; said system being adapted to perform a task as a sequence of called activities of which some are not returned to when the sequence is complete, including: means for directing said first processor to execute a portion of a first activity in said sequence, said portion including and ending with an INTERPROCESSOR CALL instruction; means for signaling a second processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR CALL instruction that a second activity has been called by said first activity and also suspending execution of said first activity; means for directing said second processor to completely execute said second activity and further execute an INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction which references a third activity in a third processor; means for signaling said third processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction that said third activity has been called not by said second activity but by whatever activity happened to call said second activity; and means for directing said third processor to completely execute said third activity, and upon completion thereof, to signal said third activity's apparent caller as indicated by said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction to resume execution.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
200 words
A data processing system including first, second and third digital processors which operate asynchronously to each other; said system being adapted to perform a task as a sequence of called activities of which some are not returned to when the sequence is complete, including: means for directing said first processor to execute a portion of a first activity in said sequence, said portion including and ending with an INTERPROCESSOR CALL instruction; means for signaling a second processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR CALL instruction that a second activity has been called by said first activity and also suspending execution of said first activity; means for directing said second processor to completely execute said second activity and further execute an INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction which references a third activity in a third processor; means for signaling said third processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction that said third activity has been called not by said second activity but by whatever activity happened to call said second activity; and means for directing said third processor to completely execute said third activity, and upon completion thereof, to signal said third activity's apparent caller as indicated by said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction to resume execution.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
48 words
A system according to claim 6 and further including means for signaling said second processor to re-execute said second activity if it is called again by yet another activity even while said third activity is being executed by said third processor in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
52 words
A system according to claim 6 and further including: a queue means for each activity containing pointers to the respective caller of that activity; and means for moving the caller pointer from the queue of said second activity into the queue of said third activity in response to said INTERPROCESSOR NEXT instruction.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
37 words
A system according to claim 8 and further including a means for limiting access to said queues such that said pointers are loaded and unloaded during multiple cycles by only one of said processors at a time.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
A system according to claim 6 and further including means for executing another activity in the first processor while said first activity is suspended.