US4558727A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Integral tire wheel
Assignee: Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co
•
Filing: 1984-08-03
•
Granted: 1985-12-17
•
Expires: 2004-08-03
Abstract
Abstract An integral tire wheel structure (10) comprising an annular generally C-shaped support member (12) having disposed at its radially outer end a ground-engaging tread portion (14), an annular generally C-shaped decoupling member (16) disposed at the radially inner end of the annular support member, and an annular mounting member (18) disposed at the radially inner end of the stress decoupling member. The integral tire wheel being made of material wherein the modulus of elasticity divided by the ultimate strength to the three halfs power is no greater than about 2.6.
Inventors
- 👤 John H. Golata
- 👤 David M. Saylor
- 👤 William E. Egan
- 👤 Arthur A. Goldstein
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 15:13
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60B; B60B9/00; B60B37/00; B60B37/10; B60B5/00; B60B5/02; B60C; B60C7/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
206 words
An integral tire wheel supporting structure comprising: (a) an annular support member having a generally C-shaped cross-sectional shape, the radially outer portion of said annular support member forming an approach angle in the range of 0° to 20°, the radially outer end of said annular support member having a flared out portion disposed at an angle greater than said approach angle, a ground engaging tread portion disposed on the radially outer surface of said annular support; (b) an annular stress decoupling member disposed at the radially inner end of said annular support member and having a substantially C-shaped cross-sectional shape which is substantially less in size than said annular support member, the open end of said C-shaped structure of said annular stress decoupling member is directed in the same general direction as the C-shaped cross-sectional shape of said annular support member; (c) the radially inner end of said stress decoupling member merges into an annular mounting member having means for allowing securing of said wheel to an axle; (d) said integral tire wheel supporting structure being made of a material wherein the relationship between modulus of elasticity (E) and ultimate strength (S) as described by the relationship (E/S 3/2 ) is no greater than about 2.6.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
206 words
An integral tire wheel supporting structure comprising: (a) an annular support member having a generally C-shaped cross-sectional shape, the radially outer portion of said annular support member forming an approach angle in the range of 0° to 20°, the radially outer end of said annular support member having a flared out portion disposed at an angle greater than said approach angle, a ground engaging tread portion disposed on the radially outer surface of said annular support; (b) an annular stress decoupling member disposed at the radially inner end of said annular support member and having a substantially C-shaped cross-sectional shape which is substantially less in size than said annular support member, the open end of said C-shaped structure of said annular stress decoupling member is directed in the same general direction as the C-shaped cross-sectional shape of said annular support member; (c) the radially inner end of said stress decoupling member merges into an annular mounting member having means for allowing securing of said wheel to an axle; (d) said integral tire wheel supporting structure being made of a material wherein the relationship between modulus of elasticity (E) and ultimate strength (S) as described by the relationship (E/S 3/2 ) is no greater than about 2.6.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
48 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 1 further characterized in that said annular support member having a radially outer half and a radially inner half wherein the radius of curvature of said radially outer half is greater than the radius of curvature of said radially inner half.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
78 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 1 further characterized in that the axially outermost point of said annular support member is spaced from the plane containing said mounting member preferably no greater than one-half the overall width of said annular support member, the distance from said plane containing the mounting member to the plane disposed midway between the axially outer ends of said ground-engaging tread portion is no greater than one-half the width of said tread portion.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
36 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 1 further characterized in that the material wherein the relationship between modulus of elasticity and ultimate strength as described by relationship (E/S 3/2 ) is no greater than 0.50.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
36 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 1 further characterized in that the material wherein the relationship between modulus of elasticity and ultimate strength as described by relationship (E/S 3/2 ) is no greater than 0.3.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 1 further characterized in that the material wherein the relationship between modulus of elasticity and ultimate strength as described by relationship (E/S 3/2 ) is no greater than 0.26.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 1 further characterized in that the material wherein the relationship between modulus of elasticity and ultimate strength as described by relationship (E/S 3/2 ) is at least 0.02.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
25 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 7 further characterized in that said wheel comprises a composite structure of fiberglass fibers embedded in epoxy resin.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
76 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 1 further characterized in that the distance between the axially outermost point of the radially inner surface of said stress decoupling member with respect to the plane passes through the center of radius of said stress decoupling member is no greater than the distance between the axially outermost point of said annular support member and said plane containing the mounting member, preferably between 30% and 50% of said distance.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
36 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 9 further characterized in that the stress decoupling member has a radius of at least two times the thickness of said wheel and preferably of at least three times.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
39 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 10 further characterized in that between said stress decoupling member and said mounting member there is provided a linking member having a radius of at least twice the thickness of said wheel.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
70 words
An integral tire wheel according to claim 11, further characterized in that the axial distance between the axially outermost point of the axially inner surface of the annular stress decoupling member and the radially outer surface of the integral tire wheel when the annular stress decoupling member merges with the annular support member is at least equal to the thickness of the thickness of the tire wheel at that point.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2090254A
Cited
FR1007671A
Cited
US2840422A
Cited
US2878074A
Cited
US4350196A
Cited
US4471999A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1988-12-16 | 1989-06-17 | 1989-12-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1992-12-16 | 1993-06-17 | 1993-12-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1996-12-16 | 1997-06-17 | 1997-12-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |