US4513612A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Multiple flow rate formation testing device and method
Assignee: Halliburton Co
•
Filing: 1983-06-27
•
Granted: 1985-04-30
•
Expires: 2003-06-27
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for measuring the permeability, as well as the deliverability, of earth formations traversing a well bore, includes drawing one or more formation flow tests, usually of small volume, from a given formation interval after the region of the formation immediately surrounding the test area is purged of well bore invasion fluid. The purging, done by first drawing a large fluid sample from the formation interval to remove well bore invasion fluid from the immediate area and displace it with connate formation fluid, provides thereby for determining the formation flow properties which obtain with the actual connate formation fluids, as well as for estimating formation damage due to prior invasion of well bore fluid.
Inventors
- 👤 Walter F. Shalek
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 06:12
CPC Classifications
E; E21; E21B; E21B49/00; E21B49/08; E21B49/10
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
154 words
A method for measuring the permeability of earth formations traversing a well bore, comprising: (a) establishing, through the wall of the well bore and isolated from fluids within the well bore, direct fluid flow communication with an adjacent formation interval, (b) drawing a first fluid sample from the formation interval to determine a first fluid permeability property for the interval, (c) drawing a second sufficiently large fluid sample from the formation interval to substantially remove the well bore invasion fluid from the immediate area and flow connate formation fluid instead, and (d) subsequently making at least one flow test from the formation interval to determine the formation flow permeability property which obtains with the actual connate formation fluids from the interval and comparing this permeability property with said first fluid permeability property to determine the extent of possible formation damage due to prior invasion of drilling fluids from the well bore into the formation.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
154 words
A method for measuring the permeability of earth formations traversing a well bore, comprising: (a) establishing, through the wall of the well bore and isolated from fluids within the well bore, direct fluid flow communication with an adjacent formation interval, (b) drawing a first fluid sample from the formation interval to determine a first fluid permeability property for the interval, (c) drawing a second sufficiently large fluid sample from the formation interval to substantially remove the well bore invasion fluid from the immediate area and flow connate formation fluid instead, and (d) subsequently making at least one flow test from the formation interval to determine the formation flow permeability property which obtains with the actual connate formation fluids from the interval and comparing this permeability property with said first fluid permeability property to determine the extent of possible formation damage due to prior invasion of drilling fluids from the well bore into the formation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising making a plurality of flow tests after drawing the large fluid sample.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of making at least one flow test further comprises making said test at a controlled flow rate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 3 wherein said step of making at least one flow test at a controlled flow rate further comprises making each such flow test at a constant differential flow pressure.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 4 further comprising making a plurality of such flow tests each at a different constant differential flow pressure.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 3 wherein said step of making at least one flow test further comprises making each such flow test at a constant fluid flow rate.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 6 further comprising making a plurality of such flow tests each at a different constant fluid flow rate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
147 words
A method for determining the deliverability of a well against any sandface back pressure, including a determination of the open flow potential of the well, comprising: (a) performing at least two permeability measurements according to the method of claim 1, (b) performing at least one high volume flow rate test of the well, and (c) using the data developed from the permeability tests to solve for n, and the date from the high volume test to solve for C, in the flow rate equation q=C(P 2 -p 2 ) n , where q equals the measured flow rate, P equals the average reservoir pressure obtained by shut-in of the well to complete stabilization, p equals the flowing sandface pressure during a given test, and C and n are constants characteristic of the well, whereby q may then be specified for the well for any sandface back pressure.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 8 wherein said high volume flow test is performed before said permeability measurement.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 8 wherein said high volume flow test is accomplished by performing at least one of a drill stem test or a production test.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
242 words
A method for determining the deliverability of a well against any sandface back pressure, including a determination of the open flow potential of the well, comprising: (a) performing at least one high volume flow rate test of the well by means of at least one of a drill stem test or a production test, (b) establishing, through the wall of the well bore and isolated from fluids within the well bore, direct fluid flow communication with a producing formation interval, (c) drawing a sufficiently large fluid sample from the formation interval to substantially remove the well bore invasion fluid from the immediate area and flow connate formation fluid instead, (d) subsequently making a plurality of flow tests from the formation interval, each test at a different constant controlled differential flow pressure, to determine the formation flow properties which obtain with the actual connate formation fluids, and (e) using the data developed from the permeability tests to solve for n, and the data from the high volume test to solve for C, in the flow rate equation q=C(P 2 -p 2 ) n , where q equals the measured flow rate of the well, P equals the average reservoir pressure obtained by shut-in of the well to complete stabilization, p equals the flowing sandface pressure during a given test, and C and n are constants characteristic of the well, whereby q may then be specified for the well for any sandface back pressure.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
242 words
A method for determining the deliverability of a well against any sandface back pressure, including a determination of the open flow potential of the well, comprising: (a) performing at least one high volume flow rate test of the well by means of at least one of a drill stem test or a production test, (b) establishing, through the wall of the well bore and isolated from fluids within the well bore, direct fluid flow communication with a producing formation interval, (c) drawing a sufficiently large fluid sample from the formation interval to substantially remove the well bore invasion fluid from the immediate area and flow connate formation fluid instead, (d) subsequently making a plurality of flow tests from the formation interval, each test at a different constant controlled differential flow pressure, to determine the formation flow properties which obtain with the actual connate formation fluids, and (e) using the data developed from the permeability tests to solve for n, and the data from the high volume test to solve for C, in the flow rate equation q=C(P 2 -p 2 ) n , where q equals the measured flow rate of the well, P equals the average reservoir pressure obtained by shut-in of the well to complete stabilization, p equals the flowing sandface pressure during a given test, and C and n are constants characteristic of the well, whereby q may then be specified for the well for any sandface back pressure.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
181 words
A formation testing tool for measuring the permeability of earth formations traversing a well bore, comprising: (a) sample drawing means locatable within the well bore for establishing, through the wall of the well bore and isolated from fluids within the well bore, a direct fluid flow path communicating with an adjacent formation interval, (b) first fluid drawing means coupled with said sample drawing means for drawing therethrough a sufficiently large fluid sample from the adjacent formation interval to substantially remove the well bore invasion fluid from the immediate area and flow connate formation fluid instead, and (c) second fluid drawing means coupled with said sample drawing means for making at least one flow test from the adjacent formation interval prior to drawing the large fluid sample, and for making a plurality of formation flow tests from the adjacent formation interval subsequent to the drawing of the large fluid sample, each of the subsequent flow tests being drawn at a different controlled constant differential flow pressure, to determine more accurately the formation flow properties which obtain with the actual connate formation fluids.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
181 words
A formation testing tool for measuring the permeability of earth formations traversing a well bore, comprising: (a) sample drawing means locatable within the well bore for establishing, through the wall of the well bore and isolated from fluids within the well bore, a direct fluid flow path communicating with an adjacent formation interval, (b) first fluid drawing means coupled with said sample drawing means for drawing therethrough a sufficiently large fluid sample from the adjacent formation interval to substantially remove the well bore invasion fluid from the immediate area and flow connate formation fluid instead, and (c) second fluid drawing means coupled with said sample drawing means for making at least one flow test from the adjacent formation interval prior to drawing the large fluid sample, and for making a plurality of formation flow tests from the adjacent formation interval subsequent to the drawing of the large fluid sample, each of the subsequent flow tests being drawn at a different controlled constant differential flow pressure, to determine more accurately the formation flow properties which obtain with the actual connate formation fluids.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1988-04-29 | 1988-10-29 | 1989-04-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1992-04-29 | 1992-10-29 | 1993-04-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1996-04-29 | 1996-10-29 | 1997-04-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |