Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
149 words
An impedance comparator, comprising: a first field effect transistor having the gate and drain electrodes connected to a first node; means for connecting a first, unknown impedance to said first node; means for biasing said first field effect transistor with a first voltage source connected through said first impedance; the second field effect transistor having a defined operational relationship to said first field effect transistor, connected through a second node into conductive series with a second impedance; means for biasing said second field effect transistor with a second voltage source connected through said second impedance; means for connecting the gate electrode of said second field effect transistor to the gate electrode of said first field effect transistor; and means for comparing the amplitude of the voltage on said first node with the amplitude of the voltage on said second node to determine the relative magnitude of said first impedance.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
149 words
An impedance comparator, comprising: a first field effect transistor having the gate and drain electrodes connected to a first node; means for connecting a first, unknown impedance to said first node; means for biasing said first field effect transistor with a first voltage source connected through said first impedance; the second field effect transistor having a defined operational relationship to said first field effect transistor, connected through a second node into conductive series with a second impedance; means for biasing said second field effect transistor with a second voltage source connected through said second impedance; means for connecting the gate electrode of said second field effect transistor to the gate electrode of said first field effect transistor; and means for comparing the amplitude of the voltage on said first node with the amplitude of the voltage on said second node to determine the relative magnitude of said first impedance.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
102 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 1, further comprising: a third field effect transistor having a defined operational relationship to said first field effect transistor, connected through a third node into conductive series with a third impedance; means for biasing said third field effect transistor with a third voltage source connected through said third impedance; means for connecting the gate electrode of said third field effect transistor to the gate electrode of said first field effect transistor; and means for comparing the amplitudes of the voltage on said third node with the amplitudes of the voltages on said first and second modes.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
54 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 2, extended to include a total of 2 n field effect transistors, 2 n nodes, 2 n impedances, 2 n voltage sources, a common connection of all field effect transistor gate electrodes, and means for comparing the amplitudes of the voltages on said 2 n nodes, wherein n≧2.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
17 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 3, wherein said 2 n voltage sources provide substantially identical voltages.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
44 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 4, wherein said means for comparing the amplitudes of the voltages generates a binary output signal in relation to the comparative amplitude of the voltage on said first node to each of the remaining 2 n -1 nodes.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 5, wherein said 2 n field effect transistors have substantially identical dimensional and operational characteristics.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
46 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 6, further including logic circuit means, coupled to said means for comparing the amplitudes of the voltages, for generating a binary output signal corresponding to the magnitude of said first impedance in relation to the remaining 2 n -1 impedances.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
51 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 7, wherein said first impedance is the effective impedance of a ROM cell field effect transistor, having n potentially different values, and said first field effect transistor is a reference for the remaining 2 n -1 field effect transistors operable in a current mirror arrangement.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
44 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 8, wherein said second and all numerically succeeding impedances are comprised of two field effect transistors connected in conductive series to replicate the series combination of a decode field effect transistor and said ROM cell field effect transistor.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
29 words
The impedance comparator recited in claim 9, wherein said field effect transistors, said impedances, and said ROM cells are in close physical proximity on a commonly fabricated semiconductor wafer.