US4486756A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of reducing angle noise in a radar
Assignee: Raytheon Co
•
Filing: 1981-12-04
•
Granted: 1984-12-04
•
Expires: 2001-12-04
Abstract
Abstract A method of reducing angle noise in return signals to a monopulse radar having a radome is shown to consist of the steps of: (a) transmitting a pair of signals at frequencies equally spaced above and below the tuning frequency of the radome; (b) digitally processing the return signals to form the complex monopulse ratios of the return signals corresponding to each one of the transmitted signals; (c) determining, by comparing the magnitudes of each monopulse sum and monopulse difference signals with the level of respective predetermined sum and difference reference signals, whether or not angle noise is exhibited and whether or not the signs of the imaginary parts of the monopulse difference signals differ; (d) comparing, to a threshold level, the amplitudes of the monopulse difference signals of those return signals which exhibit angle noise to select return signals exceeding such threshold level and whose signs differ; and, (e) averaging the real parts of the complex monopulse ratios of the return signals which exceed the threshold level finally to produce tracking signals in the presence of angle noise.
Inventors
- 👤 Theodore J. Peregrim
- 👤 Irving Kanter
- 👤 Rosario Mangiapane
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 17:17
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S13/00; G01S13/02; G01S13/06; G01S13/42; G01S13/44; G01S13/4427
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 4
Claim 1
Independent Claim
218 words
In a monopulse radar, operating through a radome having a known tuning frequency to illuminate an extended complex target so that return signals may be subjected to glint, a method of reducing boresight errors due to the effect of the radome and antenna on return signals from such target and the shape and aspect of such target, such method comprising the steps of: (a) transmitting pairs of interrogating signals, the frequencies of such signals being equally spaced above and below the tuning frequency of the radome; (b) for each return signal, forming monopulse sum and difference signals and converting such signals to corresponding complex digital signals having a real and an imaginary part; (c) calculating, from the corresponding complex digital signals, the complex monopulse ratio for each return signal; (d) comparing the magnitude of the complex digital signal corresponding to the monopulse sum signal to a first threshold signal and the magnitude of the imaginary part of the complex monopulse ratio to a second threshold signal; and (e) when the magnitude of the monopulse sum signal is greater than the first threshold signal and when the magnitude of the imaginary part of the complex monopulse ratio is less than the second threshold signal, utilizing the real part of the complex monopulse ratio as a signal to be tracked.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
218 words
In a monopulse radar, operating through a radome having a known tuning frequency to illuminate an extended complex target so that return signals may be subjected to glint, a method of reducing boresight errors due to the effect of the radome and antenna on return signals from such target and the shape and aspect of such target, such method comprising the steps of: (a) transmitting pairs of interrogating signals, the frequencies of such signals being equally spaced above and below the tuning frequency of the radome; (b) for each return signal, forming monopulse sum and difference signals and converting such signals to corresponding complex digital signals having a real and an imaginary part; (c) calculating, from the corresponding complex digital signals, the complex monopulse ratio for each return signal; (d) comparing the magnitude of the complex digital signal corresponding to the monopulse sum signal to a first threshold signal and the magnitude of the imaginary part of the complex monopulse ratio to a second threshold signal; and (e) when the magnitude of the monopulse sum signal is greater than the first threshold signal and when the magnitude of the imaginary part of the complex monopulse ratio is less than the second threshold signal, utilizing the real part of the complex monopulse ratio as a signal to be tracked.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The invention as in claim 1 wherein the magnitudes of the first and the second threshold signals are varied with range to the extended complex target.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
126 words
The method as in claim 2 with the additional step of: (a) when the magnitude of the monopulse sum signal is less than the first threshold signal or when the magnitude of the imaginary part of the complex monopulse ratio is greater than the second threshold signal, comparing the signs of the imaginary parts of the complex monopulse ratios corresponding to each pair of transmitted signals; (b) when the compared signs differ, comparing the imaginary part of each corresponding complex monopulse ratio to a third threshold signal; and (c) when the magnitudes of the imaginary parts of each corresponding complex monopulse ratio are less than such the third threshold signal, averaging the real parts of the complex monopulse ratios to derive a signal to be tracked.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US497702A
Cited
US3940767A
Cited
US3283322A
Cited
US3943508A
Cited
US4194204A
Cited
USB497702I5
Cited
US4296415A
Cited
US4090066A
Cited
US4368468A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-12-04 | 1988-06-04 | 1988-12-04 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-12-04 | 1992-06-04 | 1992-12-04 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-12-04 | 1996-06-04 | 1996-12-04 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |