US4482971A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
World wide currency inspection
Assignee: Raytheon Co
•
Filing: 1982-01-18
•
Granted: 1984-11-13
•
Expires: 2002-01-18
Abstract
Abstract An apparatus for detection of flaws in currency having multiple misregistered images. Optical means scan a test note to provide a plurality of outputs each representative of a particular patch value of a particular scan line of the test note. Generating means provide a plurality of outputs each representative of a particular patch value of a particular scan line of a reference note which is generated in real time as the test note is scanned. The generating means includes means to insure that each generated reference patch value is provided for comparison with the corresponding patch value of the test note. Each reference patch value is generated for any value of misregistration between the multiple images within a predetermined tolerance.
Inventors
- 👤 Henry Blazek
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 18:20
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07D; G07D7/00; G07D7/06; G07D7/12; G07D7/181
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
61 words
An inspection apparatus for detecting flaws on test documents having multiple misregistered images, comprising in combination, first means for optically scanning test documents, second means generating in real time a reference document having the same misregistration between images as the test document being scanned, third means comparing said test document with said generated reference document for identifying a flawed test document.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
61 words
An inspection apparatus for detecting flaws on test documents having multiple misregistered images, comprising in combination, first means for optically scanning test documents, second means generating in real time a reference document having the same misregistration between images as the test document being scanned, third means comparing said test document with said generated reference document for identifying a flawed test document.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said second means includes, first memory means storing at least three selected areas for each type of image of a perfect document with no misregistration between images.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said second means further includes, optical scanning means for scanning selected areas of a test document corresponding to those stored areas of said perfect document.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
51 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said second means further includes correlation means for each of said stored images connected to said first memory means for locating the centroid of each area on the test document with respect to the centroid of the stored areas of said perfect document.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
50 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 4, wherein said second means further includes transformation means connected to each of said correlation means and to said first means for determining the position of any point on the test document relative to the position of a corresponding point on the reference document.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
27 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said second means further includes second memory means storing a plurality of sets of constants at uniquely addressable points therein.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
70 words
An apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said second means further includes first processor means connected to said transformation means and said second memory means for formulating an address of the ones of said sets of stored constants corresponding to the coordinates of the particular patch on said test document being scanned by said first means and for generating a set of variables representative of the misregistration of said images.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
42 words
An apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said second means further includes second processor means connected to said first processor means and said second memory means generating a reference patch value corresponding to each particular patch of the test document being scanned.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
49 words
An apparatus according to claim 8 wherein said third means includes, exceedance detector means connected to said first means and said second processor means wherein each of said reference patch values is compared with its corresponding test patch value to determine if said test document meets predetermined quality standards.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
31 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 9 further including, flaw detection means connected to said exceedance detector means for identifying each test document that does not meet said predetermined quality standards.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
36 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 10 wherein said flaw detection means makes accept or reject decisions on local areas of the test document being examined and then indexes local areas to cover the entire note.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
42 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 11 wherein said flaw detection means comprises a multiplicity of flaw detectors using accept or reject criteria operating in parallel, each aimed at finding a class of defects such as singles, small clusters, and large clusters.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
61 words
An inspection apparatus according to claim 10 wherein said multiplicity of flaw detectors all of which reject a test note when the magnitude of the sum of exceedances is greater than some number Q where Q is a positive integer which determines the number of defects in a cluster of defects to be identified for the purpose of rejecting the note.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3496371A
Cited
US3727183A
Cited
US3748644A
Cited
US4131879A
Cited
US4197584A
Cited
US4288781A
Cited
US4311914A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-11-13 | 1988-05-14 | 1988-11-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-11-13 | 1992-05-14 | 1992-11-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-11-13 | 1996-05-14 | 1996-11-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |