US4475213A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Digital code converter
Assignee: Nokia Bell Labs
•
Filing: 1982-12-27
•
Granted: 1984-10-02
•
Expires: 2002-12-27
Abstract
Abstract Accumulation of distortion possibly resulting from multiple digital code conversions is prevented by including in an ADPCM-to-PCM decoder (100, FIG. 1 or 600, FIG. 6) an arrangement (119, FIG. 1 or 601, FIG. 6) for making a trial transmission of the resulting PCM sample (Ψ(k)) to obtain (via 209, FIG. 2) a composite noise value (α(k)) for the PCM sample (Ψ(k)). The composite noise value includes noise components resulting from both quantizing the code word and truncating digital signals used in the decoder and subsequent coder. The composite noise value is evaluated (via 211) to determine whether adjustment of the PCM sample value (Ψ(k)) is necessary. In one embodiment (FIG. 1, 100), a reconstructed linear version (Y r (k)) of the PCM sample is adjusted (via 216, 218, 220 or 221) when the composite noise value (α(k)) is not within the ADPCM quantizer interval for the ADPCM sample (I n (k)) being converted to PCM. The amount of adjustment is dependent on the PCM quantizer interval (214) that the reconstructed signal (Y r (k)) falls in and whether the ADPCM sample is in saturation, i.e., the most positive (215) or negative (217) ADPCM quantizer interval, or not in saturation (219). In another embodiment (FIG. 6, 600), the decoder (600) PCM output sample (Ψ(k)) is adjusted, if necessary, up or down one PCM quantizer interval (via 802 or 803) when the composite noise value (α(k)) is not within the quantizer interval decision levels of the ADPCM sample received by the decoder 600.
Inventors
- 👤 Raymond S. Medaugh
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 12:48
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03M; H03M7/00; H03M7/30; H03M7/3002; H03M7/3044; H03M7/3046
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
221 words
A decoder for converting quantized digital samples in a second code to quantized digital samples in a first code, each of said second code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of second code quantizer intervals and each of said first code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of first code quantizer intervals, including inverse adaptive quantizer means for receiving said second code digital samples and providing at its output a quantized version of the original difference signal that was encoded into said second code sample, means supplied with said quantized version of said difference signal for generating a reconstructed signal which is a linear version of the original first code sample which was quantized into said second code sample, said decoder being characterized by, means for generating a first code sample version of said reconstructed signal, means for making a trial transmission of said first code sample version to obtain a composite noise value, means for evaluating said composite noise value relative to prescribed limits determined in a predetermined relationship to the second code quantizer interval said received second code sample falls in, and means for adjusting said first code sample quantizer interval that said generated first code sample version of said reconstructed signal falls in when said composite noise value is not within said prescribed limits.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
221 words
A decoder for converting quantized digital samples in a second code to quantized digital samples in a first code, each of said second code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of second code quantizer intervals and each of said first code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of first code quantizer intervals, including inverse adaptive quantizer means for receiving said second code digital samples and providing at its output a quantized version of the original difference signal that was encoded into said second code sample, means supplied with said quantized version of said difference signal for generating a reconstructed signal which is a linear version of the original first code sample which was quantized into said second code sample, said decoder being characterized by, means for generating a first code sample version of said reconstructed signal, means for making a trial transmission of said first code sample version to obtain a composite noise value, means for evaluating said composite noise value relative to prescribed limits determined in a predetermined relationship to the second code quantizer interval said received second code sample falls in, and means for adjusting said first code sample quantizer interval that said generated first code sample version of said reconstructed signal falls in when said composite noise value is not within said prescribed limits.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
70 words
A decoder as defined in claim 1 wherein said decoder further includes means for obtaining a first code predicted estimate sample corresponding to said second code sample being converted, and wherein said means for making a trial transmission includes means for first code decoding said first code sample version and means for obtaining the algebraic difference between said decoded first code sample version and said corresponding first code predicted estimate.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
61 words
A decoder as defined in claim 1 wherein said evaluating means includes means for obtaining upper and lower limits dependent on said second code sample quantizer interval that said received second code sample falls in, said upper and lower limits being said prescribed limits, and means for determining whether said composite noise value is within said prescribed upper and lower limits.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
139 words
A decoder as defined by claim 3 wherein said adjusting means includes means for determining whether said second code sample is a most positive second code quantizer interval, means for determining whether said second code sample is a most negative second code quantizer interval, means for determining whether said composite noise value violates said prescribed upper limit or said prescribed lower limit, first means for adjusting said first code sample up one first code quantizer interval when said second code sample is said most positive second code quantizer interval or when said composite noise value violates said prescribed lower limit and second means for adjusting said first code sample down one first code quantizer interval when said second code sample is the most negative second code quantizer interval or when said composite noise value violates said prescribed upper limit.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
79 words
A decoder as defined in claim 4 wherein said upper prescribed limit is an upper decision level for said second code sample quantizer interval and said lower prescribed limit is a lower decision level for said second code sample quantizer interval, said upper limit is violated when said composite noise value is equal to or greater than said upper decision level and said lower limit is violated when said composite noise value is less than said lower decision level.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
A decoder as defined in claim 5 wherein said first code is pulse code modulation (PCM) and said second code is adaptive differential PCM(ADPCM).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
21 words
A decoder as defined in claim 6 wherein said PCM code is μ-law and said ADPCM code is four bit ADPCM.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
251 words
A decoder for converting quantized digital samples in a second code to quantized digital samples in a first code, each of said second code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of second code quantizer intervals and each of said first code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of first code quantizer intervals, including inverse adaptive quantizer means for receiving said second code digital samples and providing at its output a quantized version of the original difference signal that was encoded into said second code sample, means supplied with said quantized version of said difference signal for generating a reconstructed signal which is a linear version of the original first code sample which was quantized into said second code sample, said decoder being characterized by, means for generating a first code sample version of said reconstructed signal, means for making a trial transmission of said first code sample version to obtain a composite noise value, means for evaluating said composite noise value relative to prescribed limits determined in a predetermined relationship to the second code quantizer interval said received second code sample falls in, and means for adjusting said reconstructed signal when said composite noise value is not within said prescribed limits, so that a first code sample resulting from first code quantizing said reconstructed signal falls in a first code quantizer interval which will cause a subsequent first-to-second code coder to generate a second code sample equal to said second code sample, being converted in the decoder.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
251 words
A decoder for converting quantized digital samples in a second code to quantized digital samples in a first code, each of said second code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of second code quantizer intervals and each of said first code digital samples falling within one of a plurality of first code quantizer intervals, including inverse adaptive quantizer means for receiving said second code digital samples and providing at its output a quantized version of the original difference signal that was encoded into said second code sample, means supplied with said quantized version of said difference signal for generating a reconstructed signal which is a linear version of the original first code sample which was quantized into said second code sample, said decoder being characterized by, means for generating a first code sample version of said reconstructed signal, means for making a trial transmission of said first code sample version to obtain a composite noise value, means for evaluating said composite noise value relative to prescribed limits determined in a predetermined relationship to the second code quantizer interval said received second code sample falls in, and means for adjusting said reconstructed signal when said composite noise value is not within said prescribed limits, so that a first code sample resulting from first code quantizing said reconstructed signal falls in a first code quantizer interval which will cause a subsequent first-to-second code coder to generate a second code sample equal to said second code sample, being converted in the decoder.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
70 words
A decoder as defined in claim 8 wherein said decoder further includes means for obtaining a first code predicted estimate sample corresponding to said second code sample being converted, and wherein said means for making a trial transmission includes means for first code decoding said first code sample version and means for obtaining the algebraic difference between said decoded first code sample version and said corresponding first code predicted estimate.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
53 words
A decoder as defined in claim 8 wherein said evaluating means includes means for obtaining upper and lower limits dependent on said second code sample quantizer interval, said upper and lower limits being said prescribed limits and means for determining whether said composite noise value is within said prescribed upper and lower limits.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
62 words
A decoder as defined in claim 10 wherein said adjusting means includes means for obtaining a value representative of a first code quantizer interval size that said reconstructed signal falls in and means for adjusting the value of said reconstructed signal by a first value equal to said first code quantizer interval size scaled by at least one predetermined adjustment scaling factor.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
34 words
A decoder as defined in claim 11 wherein said at least one predetermined adjustment scaling factor is determined by a prescribed relationship between a second code quantizer characteristic and a first code error characteristic.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
41 words
A decoder as defined in claim 12 wherein said prescribed relationship is related to positive and negative slope second code error boundaries determined by said second code quantizer characteristic and said error boundaries being superimposed on said first code error characteristic.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
224 words
A decoder as defined in claim 10 wherein said adjusting means includes means for obtaining a value representative of a first code quantizer interval size that said reconstructed signal falls in, means for determining whether said second code sample is a most positive second code quantizer interval, means for determining whether said second code sample is a most negative second code quantizer interval, means for determining whether said composite noise value violates said prescribed upper limit or said prescribed lower limit, first means for adjusting said reconstructed signal value by algebraically summing said reconstructed signal with a first value dependent on said first code quantizer interval size when said second code sample is said most positive second code quantizer interval, second means for adjusting said reconstructed signal value by obtaining an algebraic difference between said reconstructed signal and said first value when said second code sample is said negative most second code quantizer interval, third means for adjusting said reconstructed signal value by algebraically summing said reconstructed signal value with a second value dependent on said first code quantizer interval size when said composite noise value violates said prescribed lower limit and fourth means for adjusting said reconstructed signal value by obtaining the algebraic difference between said reconstructed signal value and said second value when said composite noise value violates said prescribed upper limit.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
51 words
A decoder as defined in claim 14 wherein said first value is said first code quantizer interval size that said reconstructed signal falls in scaled by a first predetermined adjustment scaling factor and said second value is said first code quantizer interval size scaled by a second predetermined adjustment scaling factor.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
42 words
A decoder as defined in claim 15 wherein said first adjustment scaling factor is a value greater than the ratio of a lower first code quantizer interval value to a higher first code quantizer interval at a first code quantizer chord boundary.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
48 words
A decoder as defined in claim 15 wherein said second adjustment scaling factor is a value greater than a value determined by a prescribed relationship between a second code quantizer characteristic and a first code error characteristic and less than said ratio of first code quantizer interval values.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
33 words
A decoder as defined in claim 17 wherein said prescribed relationship includes the superposition of positive and negative slope error boundaries of said second code quantizer characteristic on said first code error characteristic.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
65 words
A decoder as defined in claim 18 wherein said second adjustment scaling factor is defined by ##EQU3## where φ is the value for said second adjustment scaling factor, and γ is said positive slope error boundary value and R is the ratio of said lower first code chord quantizer interval size to said higher first code qunatizer interval size at a first code quantizer boundary.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
26 words
A decoder as defined in claim 19 wherein said first code is μ-law pulse code modulation (PCM) and said second code is adaptive differential PCM (ADPCM).
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4179659A
Cited
US4363024A
Cited
JPS54120571A
Cited
US4296412A
Cited
US4323885A
Cited
US4384278A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-10-02 | 1988-04-02 | 1988-10-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-10-02 | 1992-04-02 | 1992-10-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-10-02 | 1996-04-02 | 1996-10-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |