US4472496A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process for preparing silver halide emulsion
Assignee: Konica Minolta Inc
•
Filing: 1982-12-30
•
Granted: 1984-09-18
•
Expires: 2002-12-30
Abstract
Abstract There is disclosed a process for producing a silver halide emulsion comprising sulfur sensitizing a silver halide emulsion for photography containing a chloride rich silver halide comprising 80 mole % or more of silver chloride under the conditions of pAg and/or temperature during the sulfur sensitization which are constituted of at least two different steps with lapse of time. According to this invention, there is provided a silver halide emulsion which can give a good image without any change, can exhibit advantages of silver chloride, and is improved in the drawbacks of high fog and poor shelf-stability of silver chloride.
Inventors
- 👤 Shigeo Tanaka
- 👤 Kaoru Onodera
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 23:36
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03C; G03C1/00; G03C1/005; G03C1/06; G03C1/08; G03C1/09
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
179 words
In a process for producing a silver halide emulsion for photography, which comprises (1) precipitation (2) sulfur sensitizing and (3) termination of sulfur sensitizing, the improvement comprising sulfur sensitizing a silver halide emulsion which contains a chloride rich silver halide comprising at least 80 mole % of silver chloride, said sulfur sensitizing comprising at least two sensitizing steps wherein the conditions of at least one of pAg and temperature are different in the first two sensitizing steps; wherein when the temperature of the first and the second sensitizing steps are different, the temperature of said first sensitizing step is higher than the temperature of said second sensitizing step; wherein when the pAg values of the first and the second sensitizing steps are different, the pAg of said second sensitizing step is greater than the pAg of said first sensitizing step; and wherein the transition from said first sensitizing step to said second sensitizing step is at a period when the sensitivity of said silver halide emulsion is up to 50% of the sensitivity after completion of said sulfur sensitizing.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
179 words
In a process for producing a silver halide emulsion for photography, which comprises (1) precipitation (2) sulfur sensitizing and (3) termination of sulfur sensitizing, the improvement comprising sulfur sensitizing a silver halide emulsion which contains a chloride rich silver halide comprising at least 80 mole % of silver chloride, said sulfur sensitizing comprising at least two sensitizing steps wherein the conditions of at least one of pAg and temperature are different in the first two sensitizing steps; wherein when the temperature of the first and the second sensitizing steps are different, the temperature of said first sensitizing step is higher than the temperature of said second sensitizing step; wherein when the pAg values of the first and the second sensitizing steps are different, the pAg of said second sensitizing step is greater than the pAg of said first sensitizing step; and wherein the transition from said first sensitizing step to said second sensitizing step is at a period when the sensitivity of said silver halide emulsion is up to 50% of the sensitivity after completion of said sulfur sensitizing.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
47 words
The process of claim 1, wherein the temperature of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 30° C. to 80° C. and wherein the temperature of said second sensitizing step is 3° C. to 30° C. less than the temperature of said first sensitizing step.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
43 words
The process of claim 1, wherein the pAg of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 5.7 to 8.4 and wherein the pAg of said second sensitizing step is at least 0.1 greater than the pAg of said first sensitizing step.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
84 words
The process of claim 1, wherein the temperature of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 30° C. to 80° C. and the temperature of said second sensitizing step is 3° C. to 30° C. less than the temperature of said first sensitizing step, and wherein the pAg of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 5.7 to 8.4 and the pAg of said second sensitizing step is at least 0.1 greater than the pAg of said first sensitizing step.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
16 words
The process of claim 1, wherein the silver halide emulsion contains a dye image forming substance.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
42 words
The process of claim 1, wherein the process of sulfur sensitizing employs a sulfur sensitizer in an amount sufficient to provide up to 3×10 -3 molecules of said sulfur sensitizer per silver ion present on the surface of the silver halide crystals.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
38 words
The process of claim 6, wherein the amount of said sulfur sensitizer is sufficient to provide between 5×10 -5 to 1×10 -3 molecules of said sensitizer per silver ion present on the surface of the silver halide crystals.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
39 words
The process of claim 1, further comprising initiating said second sensitizing step when the sensitivity of the silver halide emulsion is up to 25% greater than the sensitivity of the silver halide emulsion before commencement of said sulfur sensitizing.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
15 words
The process of claim 1, wherein the chloride rich silver halide is pure silver chloride.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claim 1, wherein said chloride rich silver halide further comprises up to 20 mole % of silver bromide.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
22 words
The process of claim 1, wherein said chloride rich silver halide consists essentially of at least 90 mole % of silver chloride.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claim 3, wherein the pAg of the second sensitizing step is in the range of 7.0 to 8.0.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claim 4, wherein the pAg of the second sensitizing step is in the range of 7.0 to 8.0.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
26 words
The process of claim 3, wherein the pAg of the second sensitizing step is 0.1 to 1.5 greater than the pAg of the first sensitizing step.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
26 words
The process of claim 4, wherein the pAg of the second sensitizing step is 0.1 to 1.5 greater than the pAg of the first sensitizing step.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
28 words
The process of claim 2, wherein the temperature of the second sensitizing step is between 5° to 20° C. lower than the temperature of the first sensitizing step.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
28 words
The process of claim 4, wherein the temperature of the second sensitizing step is between 5° to 20° C. lower than the temperature of the first sensitizing step.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
12 words
The process of claim 6, wherein the sulfur sensitizer is sodium thiosulfate.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
13 words
The process of claim 1, wherein sulfur sensitizing is conducted in two steps.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
47 words
The process of claim 19, wherein the temperature of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 30° C. to 80° C. and wherein the temperature of said second sensitizing step is 3° C. to 30° C. less than the temperature of said first sensitizing step.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
43 words
The process of claim 19, wherein the pAg of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 5.7 to 8.4 and wherein the pAg of said second sensitizing step is at least 0.1 greater than the pAg of said first sensitizing step.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
83 words
The process of claim 19, wherein the temperature of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 30° C. to 80° C. and the temperature of said second sensitizing step is 3° C. to 30° C. less than the temperature of said sensitizing step, and wherein the pAg of said second sensitizing step is within the range of 5.7 to 8.4 and the pAg of said second sensitizing step is at least 0.1 greater than the pAg of said first sensitizing step.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-09-18 | 1988-03-19 | 1988-09-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-09-18 | 1992-03-19 | 1992-09-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-09-18 | 1996-03-19 | 1996-09-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |