US4468761A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Noise suppression method
Assignee: Wintershall Dea International AG
•
Filing: 1981-05-20
•
Granted: 1984-08-28
•
Expires: 2001-05-20
Abstract
Abstract A method, when practiced, enhances seismic data so as to suppress noise in the seismic data. The seismic data was generated in a conventional manner by at least one receiver apparatus whose position does not substantially change. The method includes combining at least two elementary seismograms to form noise seismograms containing little or none of the desired signal. The number of different noise seismograms so derived is at least equal to the number of elementary seismograms to be combined to form a final seismogram. The probability distribution of noise is determined for each trace of the noise seismograms from the probability distributions of noise in the traces of the noise seismograms. The most probable form of the desired signals is derived from the probability distribution of noise in the traces of the elementary seismograms to provide the enhanced seismic data.
Inventors
- 👤 Eike Rietsch
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 00:20
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/36; G01V1/364; G01V2210/00; G01V2210/30; G01V2210/32
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
163 words
A method for suppressing noise trains in seismic data representative of detected multiple seismic events and noise by a plurality of seismic detection means so as to provide enhanced seismic data, comprising (a) deriving elementary seismic traces data for each seismic detection means from the seismic data representative of detected seismic events by said seismic detection means, (b) deriving elementary seismograms from the elementary siesmic trace, (c) combining at least two elementary seismograms in a manner to derive noise seismograms, the number of noise seismograms being at least equal to the number of elementary seismograms to be combined to form a final seismogram, (d) determining the probability distribution of noise for each trace of the noise seismogram, determining the probability distribution of noise in said traces of the elementary seismograms from the probability distributions of noise in the traces of the noise seismograms; and (f) providing the enhanced seismic data from the seismic data in accordance with the probability distribution of step (e).
Claim 2
Independent Claim
163 words
A method for suppressing noise trains in seismic data representative of detected multiple seismic events and noise by a plurality of seismic detection means so as to provide enhanced seismic data, comprising (a) deriving elementary seismic traces data for each seismic detection means from the seismic data representative of detected seismic events by said seismic detection means, (b) deriving elementary seismograms from the elementary siesmic trace, (c) combining at least two elementary seismograms in a manner to derive noise seismograms, the number of noise seismograms being at least equal to the number of elementary seismograms to be combined to form a final seismogram, (d) determining the probability distribution of noise for each trace of the noise seismogram, determining the probability distribution of noise in said traces of the elementary seismograms from the probability distributions of noise in the traces of the noise seismograms; and (f) providing the enhanced seismic data from the seismic data in accordance with the probability distribution of step (e).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 in which the seismic data comes from different transmitting and recording points having a common point of reflection.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
22 words
A method as claimed in claims 1 or 2 wherein at least three like signals are emitted from substantially the same point.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
45 words
A method as claimed in claim 3 characterized in that the elementary traces are multiplied prior to formation of the noise traces with factors which are proportional to the reciprocal value of the root from the energy of the desired signal contained in the trace.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 in which noise traces are formed from two different elementary traces.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 in which the number of formed noise traces is equal to J or a multiple of J.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method as claimed in claim 6 in which all J(J-1)/2 possible noise traces are formed.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method as claimed in claim 7 in which the elementary traces to be combined are divided in a like manner into sections and that the probability distribution of noise is determined for each section.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
12 words
A method as claimed in claim 8 in which the sections overlap.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method as claimed in claim 8 in which the probability distribution of the values of noise is described by an N-dimensional Gaussian distribution, N representing the number of digital values forming a trace.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
73 words
A method as claimed in claim 10 in which the energy of noise is determined in the noise traces or noise trace sections, that therefrom the energy of noise is determined in the elementary traces or elementary trace sections, and in which the desired signal is formed by weighted averaging from the elementary traces, the weights being proportional to the receiprocal values of the energy of noise contained in the elementary traces concerned.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 in which at least three elementary seismograms are combined to form one final seismogram.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
50 words
A method as claimed in claim 12 in which in instances where the elementary seismograms to be stacked have different reflection times caused by different points of signal generation and recording, these seismograms are subjected before stacking to a time shift known per se termed a dynamic or static correction.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method as described in claim 1 in which the seismic events involved the transmission of signals which differed in phase and step (a) includes; processing the seismic data from the seismic detection means to adjust for the differences in transmitted signals, so that the later derived elementary seismograms of step (b) would appear as if derived from a common transmitted signal.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-08-28 | 1988-02-27 | 1988-08-28 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-08-28 | 1992-02-27 | 1992-08-28 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-08-28 | 1996-02-27 | 1996-08-28 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |