US4432930A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Spectral shift reactor control method
Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Corp
•
Filing: 1980-12-16
•
Granted: 1984-02-21
•
Expires: 2000-12-16
Abstract
Abstract A method of operating a pressurized water nuclear reactor comprising determining the present core power and reactivity levels and predicting the change in such levels due to displacer rod movements. Groups or single clusters of displacer rods can be inserted or withdrawn based on the predicted core power and reactivity levels to change the core power level and power distribution thereby providing load follow capability, without changing control rod positions or coolant boron concentrations.
Inventors
- 👤 Albert J. Impink, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 08:51
CPC Classifications
G; G21; G21C; G21C7/00; G21C7/32; G21C7/26; G21C7/27; G21C7/06; G21C7/08; G21C7/10; G21C7/117; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E30/00; Y02E30/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
119 words
A method of operating a nuclear reactor comprising: determining the current power density of each core zone; predicting the anticipated reactivity change of each of said core zones after movement of the corresponding reactor coolant displacer elements, based on the equation ΔR=K×BU×APD where ΔR=reactivity change of the core zone resulting from the movement of the corresponding displacer element; APD=core zone power density before movement of the corresponding displacer element; BU=burnup in MWD/MTU; and K=a constant; determining the reactivity change needed to achieve the desired reactor core power level; selecting an appropriate displacer element for movement to attain the desired reactivity change; and moving said selected displacer element relative to said core for attaining the desired reactor core power level.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
119 words
A method of operating a nuclear reactor comprising: determining the current power density of each core zone; predicting the anticipated reactivity change of each of said core zones after movement of the corresponding reactor coolant displacer elements, based on the equation ΔR=K×BU×APD where ΔR=reactivity change of the core zone resulting from the movement of the corresponding displacer element; APD=core zone power density before movement of the corresponding displacer element; BU=burnup in MWD/MTU; and K=a constant; determining the reactivity change needed to achieve the desired reactor core power level; selecting an appropriate displacer element for movement to attain the desired reactivity change; and moving said selected displacer element relative to said core for attaining the desired reactor core power level.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
77 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein said method further comprises: determining the fraction of the total core power that is attributed to each of said core zones; predicting the anticipated fraction of the total core power that would be attributed to each of said core zones after movement of the corresponding reactor coolant displacer element; and selecting said appropriate displacer element for movement to attain the desired reactivity change without disturbing the total core power distribution.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method according to claim 2 wherein said step of predicting the anticipated fraction of the total core power that would be attributed to each of said core zones after movement of the corresponding displacer element comprises predicting said fraction where: NPD=(a+b×BU)×OPD and where: NPD=core zone power density after displacer element movement; OPD=core zone power density prior to displacer element movement; BU=burnup in MWD/MTU; a=a constant; and b=a constant.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method according to claim 3 wherein said method further comprises prior to moving said selected displacer element, selecting the next appropriate displacer element for movement and determining that said selected appropriate displacer element movement would not preclude moving said next appropriate displacer element.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
8 words
The method according to claim 4 wherein K=0.0054.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
10 words
The method according to claim 5 wherein a=1.17 and b=0.00033.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3565760A
Cited
US4236220A
Cited
US4069097A
Cited
US4240874A
Cited
JPS5439795A
Cited
US4299657A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-02-20 | 1987-08-22 | 1988-02-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-02-20 | 1991-08-22 | 1992-02-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-02-20 | 1995-08-22 | 1996-02-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |