US4428236A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of acoustic emission testing of steel vessels or pipelines, especially for nuclear reactor installations
Assignee: Kraftwerk Union AG
•
Filing: 1981-09-25
•
Granted: 1984-01-31
•
Expires: 2001-09-25
Abstract
Abstract Method of acoustic-emission testing of a steel component such as a vessel of pipeline especially of primary circulatory loops of nuclear reactor installations wherein the component, on one hand is subjected to a pressure medium, such as water, and, on the other hand, to ultrasonic pulses emitted during deformation development resulting from growth of cracks therein or from leaks and transmitted through the component, which includes detecting and amplifying the ultrasonic pulses with equipment, respectively, formed of test probes, which are disposed so as to determine respective sources of acoustic emission due to differences in transmission time of the ultrasonic pulses through the component, and of electronic amplifiers operatively associated with the test probes, and then feeding a resultant amplified defect signal from the equipment to a display, the equipment being tuned to reception of a frequency band of acoustic-emission spectrum which is above a limiting frequency f G defined by the relationship: ##EQU1## wherein d is the wall thickness of the component being tested.
Inventors
- 👤 Erwin Votava
- 👤 Gunter Stipsits
- 👤 Richard Sommer
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 15:16
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01M; G01M3/00; G01M3/02; G01M3/04; G01M3/24; G01M3/243; G01H; G01H1/00; G01N; G01N29/00; G01N29/14; G21; G21C; G21C17/00; G21C17/003; G01N2291/00; G01N2291/02; G01N2291/028; G01N2291/02854; G01N2291/26; G01N2291/269; G01N2291/2695; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E30/00; Y02E30/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim
165 words
Method of acoustic-emission testing of a steel component such as a vessel or pipeline especially of primary circulatory loops of nuclear reactor installations wherein the component, on one hand is subjected to a pressure medium, such as water, and, on the other hand, to ultrasonic pulses emitted during deformation development resulting from growth of cracks therein or from leaks and transmitted through the component, which comprises detecting and amplifying the ultrasonic pulses with equipment, respectively, formed of test probes, which are disposed so as to determine respective sources of acoustic emission due to differences in transmission time of the ultrasonic pulses through the component, and of electronic amplifiers operatively associated with the test probes, and then feeding a resultant amplified defect signal from the equipment to a display, the equipment being tuned to reception of a frequency band of acoustic-emission spectrum which is above a limiting frequency f G defined by the relationship: ##EQU4## wherein d is the wall thickness of the component being tested.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
165 words
Method of acoustic-emission testing of a steel component such as a vessel or pipeline especially of primary circulatory loops of nuclear reactor installations wherein the component, on one hand is subjected to a pressure medium, such as water, and, on the other hand, to ultrasonic pulses emitted during deformation development resulting from growth of cracks therein or from leaks and transmitted through the component, which comprises detecting and amplifying the ultrasonic pulses with equipment, respectively, formed of test probes, which are disposed so as to determine respective sources of acoustic emission due to differences in transmission time of the ultrasonic pulses through the component, and of electronic amplifiers operatively associated with the test probes, and then feeding a resultant amplified defect signal from the equipment to a display, the equipment being tuned to reception of a frequency band of acoustic-emission spectrum which is above a limiting frequency f G defined by the relationship: ##EQU4## wherein d is the wall thickness of the component being tested.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
22 words
Method according to claim 1 wherein the test probes are tuned to the frequency band above the limit frequency f G .
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
21 words
Method according to claim 1 wherein the amplifiers are tuned to the frequency band above the limit frequency f G .
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
25 words
Method according to claim 1 wherein the test probes and the amplifiers are tuned to the frequency band above the limit frequency f G .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
Method according to claim 1 wherein the equipment is tuned to a reception restricted for frequency bands below the limit frequency f G .
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
Method according to claim 1 wherein the equipment is non-resonant for frequency bands below the limit frequency f G .
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
Method according to claim 1 wherein the test probes are broad-band and cooperate with post-staged preamplifiers having a high-pass filtered limiting frequency f G .
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
29 words
Method according to claim 1 wherein the test probes proper are resonant above the limiting frequency f G but limited or non-resonant below the limiting frequency f G .
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4033179A
Cited
US4088907A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-01-30 | 1987-08-01 | 1988-01-31 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-01-30 | 1991-08-01 | 1992-01-31 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-01-30 | 1995-08-01 | 1996-01-31 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |