← Back to Patent Explorer
US4428213A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Duplex peening and smoothing process

Assignee: RTX Corp
•
Filing: 1981-09-10
•
Granted: 1984-01-31
•
Expires: 2001-09-10
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Disclosed is a two step process of peening for workpieces having small radii fillets or fragile edges, such as gas turbine airfoils have. In the first step, relatively small size shot of less than 1 mm dia is used to impart a first peening intensity to a workpiece. This results in a first relatively rough surface finish. In the second step, shot of substantially uniform diameter in the range 1-2.5 mm is impacted with uniform velocity to provide a surface finish smoother than 30AA (10 -6 inch). When fillets are peened, improved fatigue life results from the duplex process. When used on edges, where direct edge impact is avoided in the second step, deformed edges are avoided by the process. Yet the workpiece is substantially smooth and the edges have the requisite residual stress distribution.

Inventors

  • 👤 James W. Neal
  • 👤 Joseph W. Sullivan
  • 👤 Joseph F. Loersch

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-05 07:31
CPC Classifications
C; C21; C21D; C21D7/00; C21D7/02; C21D7/04; C21D7/06

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim 138 words
The method of surface treating a workpiece to provide residual compressive stresses and smooth surfaces finish, which comprises (a) impacting a first portion of the workpiece with a first stream of shot, the shot having a mean diameter of less than about 1 mm, to provide the said first portion of the workpiece with a first set of residual stresses and a first surface finish; (b) impacting a second portion of the workpiece with a second stream of shot, the shot having a substantially uniform diameter in the range 1-2.5 mm and a substantially uniform mass and velocity, to provide a second set of residual stresses and a second surface finish smoother than about 30 AA, said finish being smoother than the first surface finish, said second impacted portion overlapping at least in part the first impacted portion.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 138 words
The method of surface treating a workpiece to provide residual compressive stresses and smooth surfaces finish, which comprises (a) impacting a first portion of the workpiece with a first stream of shot, the shot having a mean diameter of less than about 1 mm, to provide the said first portion of the workpiece with a first set of residual stresses and a first surface finish; (b) impacting a second portion of the workpiece with a second stream of shot, the shot having a substantially uniform diameter in the range 1-2.5 mm and a substantially uniform mass and velocity, to provide a second set of residual stresses and a second surface finish smoother than about 30 AA, said finish being smoother than the first surface finish, said second impacted portion overlapping at least in part the first impacted portion.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 56 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the workpiece has a surface contour, such as a fillet, having a nominal inside radius, and where the nominal diameter of the first stream of shot is less than half said inside radius, and wherein the diameter of the second stream of shot is more than half said inside radius.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the intensity of the second stream of shot is equal to the intensity of the first stream.
Claim 5
Independent Claim 22 words
The method of claims 1, 2, or 3 wherein the first shot stream is at an intensity of about 0.25-0.30 mm N.
Claim 6
Independent Claim 26 words
The method of claims 1 or 2 wherein the second stream of shot is comprised of particles having substantially uniform diameters in the range 1.5-2.0 mm.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 33 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the first impacting step (a) is carried out using glass beads, and wherein the second step (b) is carried out using spherical steel shot accelerated by gravity.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 37 words
An article produced by the method of claim 1 having greater fatigue strength than an article produced using either the first or the second step alone, the article having a peened surface finish smoother than 30 AA.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 129 words
The method of surface treating a workpiece to provide residual compressive stresses and smooth surface finish, which comprises (a) impacting the entire surface of the workpiece with a first stream of shot, the shot having a mean diameter of less than about 1 mm, to provide the workpiece with a first set of residual stresses and a first surface finish; (b) impacting a portion of the entire surface of the workpiece with a second stream of shot, the shot having a substantially uniform diameter in the range 1-2.5 mm and a substantially uniform mass and velocity, to provide the portion with a second set of residual stresses greater than the first set and a second surface finish smoother than the first surface finish and smoother than about 30 AA.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 129 words
The method of surface treating a workpiece to provide residual compressive stresses and smooth surface finish, which comprises (a) impacting the entire surface of the workpiece with a first stream of shot, the shot having a mean diameter of less than about 1 mm, to provide the workpiece with a first set of residual stresses and a first surface finish; (b) impacting a portion of the entire surface of the workpiece with a second stream of shot, the shot having a substantially uniform diameter in the range 1-2.5 mm and a substantially uniform mass and velocity, to provide the portion with a second set of residual stresses greater than the first set and a second surface finish smoother than the first surface finish and smoother than about 30 AA.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the workpiece is an airfoil having edges and further comprising preventing the second stream of shot from impacting at least one of the edges.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US937180A Cited
US3073022A Cited
US3482423A Cited
US3705511A Cited
US3668913A Cited
US4034585A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1987-01-30 1987-08-01 1988-01-31 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1991-01-30 1991-08-01 1992-01-31 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1995-01-30 1995-08-01 1996-01-31 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag