US4417632A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Automatic weighing method and device
Assignee: Battelle-Institut
•
Filing: 1980-11-14
•
Granted: 1983-11-29
•
Expires: 2000-11-14
Abstract
Abstract For the automatic weighing of a beam balance with electromagnetic force compensation, substitution control weights and digital recording are used. An indicator signals the position of balance beam to a microcomputer. The load compensation is carried out with a limited number of variable electromagnetic compensation forces of constant amplitude, which are produced by means of a corresponding number of discrete constant currents. The currents are graded according to decreasing powers of a numerical system of a suitable basis; as a rule, just like decimally organized figures according to units and powers of ten of these units. Starting out from upper to lower decades, a count is made in each decade as to how many compensation units are needed in order to overcompensate the load. For this purpose, a decision is made merely in the case of every compensation step--without determining precisely the rest position of the balance beam--as to whether the load applied is larger or smaller than the compensation force. Whenever the indicator signals an overcompensation, then the preceding counting step is regarded as the weighing result of this decade. Numerical correction values are assigned to each compensation step of each decade. The weighing results develops from the sum of the weighing results of all decades and the sum of correction values which had been assigned to the evaluated compensation steps of each decade.
Inventors
- 👤 Peter Lohberg
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 15:30
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01L; G01L1/00; G01L1/08; G01L1/086; G01G; G01G7/00; G01G7/02; G01G7/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
175 words
Process for the automatic weighing, in case of which the deviation of the balance beam from the rest position is compensated within the scope of a regulating process electromagnetically and the compensation force needed for this is used as a measure for the mass to be determined, characterized in that compensating forces are used which are graded according to decreasing power of a decadal numerical system, whereby, starting out from larger to smaller compensation force the weight-value of each power is always compensated by (n-1) quantization steps, whereby n signifies that number of quantization steps within the used decadal system which causes an overcompensation, in that the weight is determined from the sum of the compensation forces of all powers, and in that the weighing result is determined from the addition of the sum of the compensation forces of all powers and the sum of numerically and electronically stored correction values, whereby the correction values correspond to the compensation errors which were determined once within the scope of one calibrating process for each compensation step.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
175 words
Process for the automatic weighing, in case of which the deviation of the balance beam from the rest position is compensated within the scope of a regulating process electromagnetically and the compensation force needed for this is used as a measure for the mass to be determined, characterized in that compensating forces are used which are graded according to decreasing power of a decadal numerical system, whereby, starting out from larger to smaller compensation force the weight-value of each power is always compensated by (n-1) quantization steps, whereby n signifies that number of quantization steps within the used decadal system which causes an overcompensation, in that the weight is determined from the sum of the compensation forces of all powers, and in that the weighing result is determined from the addition of the sum of the compensation forces of all powers and the sum of numerically and electronically stored correction values, whereby the correction values correspond to the compensation errors which were determined once within the scope of one calibrating process for each compensation step.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
61 words
Process as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the weighing result is determined from the addition of the sum of the compensation forces of all powers and the sum of numerically and electronically stored correction values, whereby the correction values correspond to the compensation errors which were determined once within the scope of one calibrating process for each compensation step.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
17 words
Process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the compensation forces are scaled decadically.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
Process as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the correction values are taken into account both in the case of electromagnetic force compensation as well as in case of compensation by other methods, for example, by substitution weights.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
109 words
Device for carrying out the process claimed in claim 3 with digital recording, built up according to the principle of electromagnetic force compensation, possibly in connection with other compensation systems, for example, substitution weights, and with the use of a microprocessor as well as of an arrangement for signaling the deflection of the balance beam from its rest position, characterized in that the arrangement for signaling the deflection of the balance beam from the rest position is connected with the microprocessor, which controls a current distribution network, which in connection with a precision current source produces currents of quantized strengths, which feed at least one electromagnetic force compensation arrangement.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
Device as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that a separate force compensation arrangement (B 1 , B 2 , B 3 . . . ) is provided for each power.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
54 words
Device as in claim 5, characterized in that an electronic storage is provided in connection with the microprocessor, in which correction values may be stored, capable of being called up, whereby the correction values correspond to the compensation errors which were determined once within the scope of a calibrating process for every compensation step.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
Device as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that one force compensation arrangement is provided for several powers.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
54 words
Device as in claim 8, characterized in that an electronic storage is provided in connection with the microprocessor in which correction values may be stored, capable of being called up, whereby the correction values correspond to the compensation errors which were determined once within the scope of a calibrating process for every compensation step.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
177 words
Process for the automatic weighing, in case of which the deviation of the balance beam from the rest position is compensated within the scope of a regulating process by substitution weights, and the compensation force needed for this is used as a measure for the mass to be determined, characterized in that compensating forces are used which are graded according to decreasing powers of a decadal numerical system, whereby, starting out from larger to smaller compensation forces the weight-value of each power is always compensated by (n-1) quantization steps, whereby n signifies that number of quantization steps within the used decadal system which causes an over-compensation, in that the weight is determined from the sum of the compensation forces of all powers, and in that the weighing result is determined from the addition of the sum of the compensation forces of all powers and the sum of numerically and electronically stored correction values, whereby the correction values correspond to the compensation errors which were determined once within the scope of one calibrating process for each compensation step.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
177 words
Process for the automatic weighing, in case of which the deviation of the balance beam from the rest position is compensated within the scope of a regulating process by substitution weights, and the compensation force needed for this is used as a measure for the mass to be determined, characterized in that compensating forces are used which are graded according to decreasing powers of a decadal numerical system, whereby, starting out from larger to smaller compensation forces the weight-value of each power is always compensated by (n-1) quantization steps, whereby n signifies that number of quantization steps within the used decadal system which causes an over-compensation, in that the weight is determined from the sum of the compensation forces of all powers, and in that the weighing result is determined from the addition of the sum of the compensation forces of all powers and the sum of numerically and electronically stored correction values, whereby the correction values correspond to the compensation errors which were determined once within the scope of one calibrating process for each compensation step.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
98 words
Device for carrying out the process of claim 10, with digital recording, built up according to a compensation system which utilizes substitution weights, and with the use of a microprocessor as well as of an arrangement for signaling the deflection of the balance beam from its rest position, characterized in that the arrangement for signaling the deflection of the balance beam from the rest position is connected with the microprocessor, which controls a current distribution network, which in connection with a precision current source produces currents of quantized strengths, which feed at least one electromagnetic force compensation arrangement.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
DE1004822B
Cited
DE1294056B
Cited
DE2511103C2
Cited
US4004458A
Cited
DE2621483C2
Cited
US4153124A
Cited
FR2388258A1
Cited
US4149605A
Cited
DE2803978A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1986-11-28 | 1987-05-30 | 1987-11-29 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1990-11-28 | 1991-05-30 | 1991-11-29 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1994-11-28 | 1995-05-30 | 1995-11-29 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |