US4417478A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for determining lead frame failure modes using acoustic emission and discriminant analysis techniques
Assignee: AT&T Inc
•
Filing: 1981-11-30
•
Granted: 1983-11-29
•
Expires: 2001-11-30
Abstract
Abstract An automatic pull tester and an acoustic emission system are herein combined to analyze the failure modes of lead frames bonded to integrated circuits. By using a discriminant analysis technique, a specific failure mode can be determined in real-time by first measuring up to five variables during the pulling operation. The five variables that may be measured comprise acoustic emission signals of a first amplitude (AE1), acoustic emission signals of a second amplitude (AE2), the time elapsed until failure (Δt), the number (n) of acoustic emission bursts above a first threshold, to the peak pulling force at failure (L max ). Next, the variables measured are incorporated into a plurality of predetermined functions, each function corresponding to one failure mode (FM1 to FM5). The failure mode of the bond is determined by selecting the function having the highest value (FIG. 4).
Inventors
- 👤 Min-Chung Jon
- 👤 Vito Palazzo
- 👤 George W. Sturm
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 22:28
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N19/00; G01N19/04; G01N29/00; G01N29/14
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
174 words
A destructive testing method for determining the failure mode of articles, bonded together, comprising the steps of: applying a destructive pulling force to one of the bonded articles; measuring at least one variable associated with the destructive test, the variable being selected from a group comprising: (a) first acoustic emission signals emanating from the bonded articles during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a first threshold, (b) second acoustic emission signals emanating from the bonded articles during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a second threshold, (c) elapsed time until failure, (d) number of acoustic emission bursts above said first threshold during the destructive test, and (e) peak load applied to the bonded articles until failure; incorporating said at least one measured variable into a plurality of predetermined discriminant functions, each one of said discriminant functions corresponding to one failure mode of a plurality of failure modes; and selecting out of said plurality of discriminant functions the discriminant function having the highest value thereby determining the corresponding failure mode of the articles.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
174 words
A destructive testing method for determining the failure mode of articles, bonded together, comprising the steps of: applying a destructive pulling force to one of the bonded articles; measuring at least one variable associated with the destructive test, the variable being selected from a group comprising: (a) first acoustic emission signals emanating from the bonded articles during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a first threshold, (b) second acoustic emission signals emanating from the bonded articles during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a second threshold, (c) elapsed time until failure, (d) number of acoustic emission bursts above said first threshold during the destructive test, and (e) peak load applied to the bonded articles until failure; incorporating said at least one measured variable into a plurality of predetermined discriminant functions, each one of said discriminant functions corresponding to one failure mode of a plurality of failure modes; and selecting out of said plurality of discriminant functions the discriminant function having the highest value thereby determining the corresponding failure mode of the articles.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 1, comprising measuring two variables out of said group of variables, and incorporating said two measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 1, comprising measuring three variables out of said group of variables, and incorporating said three measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 1, comprising measuring four variables out of said group of variables, and incorporating said four measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method according to claim 1, comprising measuring all the variables of said group of variables, and incorporating said measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
188 words
A destructive testing method for determining the failure mode of a lead bonded to a substrate comprising the steps of: applying a pulling force to the lead; measuring at least one variable associated with the destructive test, the variable being selected from a group comprising: (a) first acoustic emission signals emanating from the bond between the lead and the substrate during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a first threshold, (b) second acoustic emission signals emanating from the bond between the lead and the substrate during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a second threshold, (c) elapsed time until failure, (d) number of acoustic emission bursts above said first threshold during the destructive test, and (e) peak load applied to the lead until failure; incorporating said at least one measured variable into a plurality of predetermined discriminant functions, each one of said discriminant functions corresponding to one failure mode of a plurality of failure modes; and selecting out of said plurality of discriminant functions the discriminant function having the highest value thereby determining the corresponding failure mode of the bond between the lead and the substrate.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
188 words
A destructive testing method for determining the failure mode of a lead bonded to a substrate comprising the steps of: applying a pulling force to the lead; measuring at least one variable associated with the destructive test, the variable being selected from a group comprising: (a) first acoustic emission signals emanating from the bond between the lead and the substrate during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a first threshold, (b) second acoustic emission signals emanating from the bond between the lead and the substrate during the destructive test and having amplitudes above a second threshold, (c) elapsed time until failure, (d) number of acoustic emission bursts above said first threshold during the destructive test, and (e) peak load applied to the lead until failure; incorporating said at least one measured variable into a plurality of predetermined discriminant functions, each one of said discriminant functions corresponding to one failure mode of a plurality of failure modes; and selecting out of said plurality of discriminant functions the discriminant function having the highest value thereby determining the corresponding failure mode of the bond between the lead and the substrate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 6, comprising measuring two variables out of said group of variables, and incorporating said two measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 6, comprising measuring three variables out of said group of variables, and incorporating said three measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 6, comprising measuring four variables out of said group of variables, and incorporating said four measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method according to claim 6, comprising measuring all the variables of said group of variables, and incorporating said measured variables into the plurality of discriminant functions.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1986-11-28 | 1987-05-30 | 1987-11-29 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1990-11-28 | 1991-05-30 | 1991-11-29 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1994-11-28 | 1995-05-30 | 1995-11-29 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |