US4398467A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Explosive fragmentation devices with coiled wire progressively varied
Assignee: BAE Systems Global Combat Systems Munitions Ltd
•
Filing: 1980-12-05
•
Granted: 1983-08-16
•
Expires: 2000-12-05
Abstract
Abstract An explosive fragmentation device such as a grenade or a mortar bomb has a casing formed from flat sided notched wire formed into a coil. Instead of coiling the wire so that sides of the coiled wire which are adjacent after coiling lie normal to the longitudinal axis of the coil, as in a known form of grenade body, the wire is given additionally a twist about its own longitudinal axis during coiling, so that the adjacent flat faces of adjacent turns are substantially normal to the surface of the finished casing. In this way adjacent turns overlay one another, preferably completely, and the outer surface of the casing can then be smooth. Also, adjacent turns can then be bonded together as by brazing or soldering, which is impractical with coiling "normal to the axis". This means explosive cannot be trapped between adjacent turns to be accidentally detonated, an outer casing is unnecessary, and the casing is stronger.
Inventors
- 👤 John W. Leigh
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 20:18
CPC Classifications
F; F42; F42B; F42B12/00; F42B12/02; F42B12/20; F42B12/22; F42B12/26
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
111 words
A casing for an explosive fragmentation device, said casing being formed of coiled wire, the diameter of the turns in said coiled wire being varied progressively over at least a part of the length of the casing so that in longitudinal cross-section the mean profile of the said part of the casing is inclined to the longitudinal axis thereof, the wire having a pair of opposed flat faces, the wire being twisted about its longitudinally axis during coiling so that the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns overlay one another and are oriented substantially normal to the said mean profile, and the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns being bonded together.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
111 words
A casing for an explosive fragmentation device, said casing being formed of coiled wire, the diameter of the turns in said coiled wire being varied progressively over at least a part of the length of the casing so that in longitudinal cross-section the mean profile of the said part of the casing is inclined to the longitudinal axis thereof, the wire having a pair of opposed flat faces, the wire being twisted about its longitudinally axis during coiling so that the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns overlay one another and are oriented substantially normal to the said mean profile, and the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns being bonded together.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
21 words
A casing as claimed in claim 1 wherein the said opposed flat faces of adjacent turns overlay one another substantially completely.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
13 words
A grenade or mortar bomb having a casing as claimed in claim 1.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
An explosive fragmentation device including a casing as claimed in claim 1 and a mass of explosive within the casing and in contact with the inner surface of the wire turns.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
20 words
A casing as claimed in claim 1 wherein the wire is formed with weakened sections at intervals along its length.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
A casing as claimed in claim 5 wherein the weakened sections are in the form of notches extending transversely of the wire across a face thereof other than the said opposed flat faces.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
A casing as claimed in claim 6 wherein the wire is coiled with the notches on the inner surface of the coils.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
A casing as claimed in claim 1 wherein the wire is of rectangular cross-section prior to coiling.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
29 words
A casing as claimed in claim 1 comprising a plurality of coils arranged one to overlay the next, and the adjacent surfaces of adjacent coils conforming one to another.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
16 words
A casing as claimed in claim 9 wherein the turns in adjacent layers overlap one another.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
143 words
A method of making a casing for an explosive fragmentation device, including the step of coiling a length of wire into a casing having a longitudinal extent defined by superposed turns of the wire coil, said coiling step including the step of progressively varying the diameter of the turns over at least a part of the length of the casing so that in longitudinal cross-section the mean profile of the said part of the casing is inclined to the longitudinal axis thereof, the wire having a pair of opposed flat faces, said coiling step further including the step of twisting the wire about its longitudinal axis while it is being coiled, so that the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns overlay one another and are oriented substantially normal to the said mean profile, and bonding together the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
143 words
A method of making a casing for an explosive fragmentation device, including the step of coiling a length of wire into a casing having a longitudinal extent defined by superposed turns of the wire coil, said coiling step including the step of progressively varying the diameter of the turns over at least a part of the length of the casing so that in longitudinal cross-section the mean profile of the said part of the casing is inclined to the longitudinal axis thereof, the wire having a pair of opposed flat faces, said coiling step further including the step of twisting the wire about its longitudinal axis while it is being coiled, so that the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns overlay one another and are oriented substantially normal to the said mean profile, and bonding together the opposed flat faces of adjacent turns.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the said opposed flat faces of adjacent turns are bonded together by a method selected from the group comprising soldering and brazing.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
64 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the wire is of trapezoidal cross-section, the wire being coiled so that the face which is the narrower of the parallel faces prior to coiling is on the inner surface of the coils, and the deformation produced by the coiling action resulting in the said opposed flat faces being substantially parallel to one another after coiling.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US33541A
Cited
US1203062A
Cited
US2337765A
Cited
US2393274A
Cited
US2458576A
Cited
GB580415A
Cited
US3298308A
Cited
US3349711A
Cited
US3590451A
Cited
US3757693A
Cited
FR2312009B1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1986-08-15 | 1987-02-14 | 1987-08-16 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1990-08-15 | 1991-02-14 | 1991-08-16 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1994-08-15 | 1995-02-14 | 1995-08-16 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |