US4387078A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process for effecting removal of sulfur oxide gases from stack gases
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1981-07-22
•
Granted: 1983-06-07
•
Expires: 2001-07-22
Abstract
Abstract A solid pollution-treatment product consisting of a core material of lime, quicklime or hydrated lime. The core is surrounded by a cracked shell formed of either calcium sulfate or calcium carbonate, such materials being referred to in this and prior applications of inventor by the coined terms "Linfans" and "Linveins", respectively. The described particulate material is particularly reactive to sulfur oxide bearing gases. Reactivity of such core material is even further enhanced by increasing its porosity through hydration and used in either the hydrated form or a selectively, partially or wholly dehydrated form before exposure to the sulfur oxide pollutants intended to be removed from flue gas or the like.
Inventors
- 👤 Ping-Wha Lin
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 09:51
CPC Classifications
B; B01; B01D; B01D53/00; B01D53/34; B01D53/46; B01D53/48; B01D53/50; B01D53/508
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
94 words
A process for effecting desulfurization comprising the steps of: passing a flow of calcium oxide through a reactor containing sulfur trioxide gas, withdrawing the reaction product of the calcium oxide and sulfur trioxide, temperature quenching such reaction product to effect a porous core of unreacted calcium oxide and an outer shell of cracked calcium sulfate, hydrating the quenched calcium oxide core and cracked outer coating of calcium sulfate to effect a hydrated calcium oxide core, and continuously resupplying such hydrated product to the reactor for additional reaction with sulfur trioxide within the core region.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
94 words
A process for effecting desulfurization comprising the steps of: passing a flow of calcium oxide through a reactor containing sulfur trioxide gas, withdrawing the reaction product of the calcium oxide and sulfur trioxide, temperature quenching such reaction product to effect a porous core of unreacted calcium oxide and an outer shell of cracked calcium sulfate, hydrating the quenched calcium oxide core and cracked outer coating of calcium sulfate to effect a hydrated calcium oxide core, and continuously resupplying such hydrated product to the reactor for additional reaction with sulfur trioxide within the core region.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
37 words
The process in accordance with claim 1 including the step of dehydrating the moisturized core of calcium oxide prior to recycling the reaction product to the reactor for further sulfur trioxide reaction with the dehydrated core material.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
31 words
The process in accordance with claim 1 including the step of heating the calcium oxide core material in its outer jacket of cracked calcium sulfate prior to recycling to the reactor.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
48 words
The process in accordance with claim 1 including the step of introducing the hydrated calcium oxide core material in cracked jacketed form, at selected locations of said reactor whereby the additional sulfur trioxide reaction occurs at a preselected temperature gradient between the desulfurizing agent and the reactor contents.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
111 words
The process in accordance with claim 1 including the step of continuously supplying limestone material to said reactor, continuously withdrawing the reaction product of limestone and sulfur trioxide from said reactor, quenching the reaction product at a rate which will effect the cracking of an outer jacket of calcium sulfate material, rendering the unreacted calcium oxide core into a porous condition by effecting hydration thereof, and selectively drying in an amount ranging from no dehydration to substantially entire dehydration of such core and thereafter returning the selectively dehydrated reaction product to the reactor at a preferred location within said reactor whereby further sulfur oxide reaction occurs through a preferred temperature gradient.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
62 words
The process in accordance with claim 5 including the step of continuously withdrawing the outflow from said reactor, quenching and thereafter selectively hydrating such gaseous phase outflow from said reactor, separating the solid content from said gas, venting the sulfur oxide free gases from the system, and thereafter returning the reaction product from the gaseous phase for additional reaction within said reactor.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
33 words
The process in accordance with claim 1 in which the outer core material is calcium sulfate, and said core material is selected from the group consisting of lime, quick lime or hydrated lime.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1986-06-06 | 1986-12-06 | 1987-06-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1990-06-06 | 1990-12-06 | 1991-06-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1994-06-06 | 1994-12-06 | 1995-06-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |