US4366050A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Scheelite flotation
Assignee: Cyprus Amax Minerals Co
•
Filing: 1981-01-19
•
Granted: 1982-12-28
•
Expires: 2001-01-19
Abstract
Abstract A scheelite concentrate is recovered from a scheelite ore containing silicate minerals and other calcareous minerals by froth flotation which process comprises grinding the ore sufficiently fine to liberate the scheelite grains, pulping the gound ore with water to form a slurry containing between about 20% and about 40% solids by weight, sequentially conditioning the slurry with at least one alkali metal carbonate in small but effective amounts to provide an alkaline pH adjustment and a source of carbonate ions, with small but effective amount of alkali metal silicates to depress siliceous and calcareous gangue minerals other than scheelite and with a fatty acid collector in small but effective amounts to coat the scheelite grains, the conditioning with the fatty acid collector being conducted with sufficient agitation to disintegrate floccules of scheelite, silicate mineral and other calcareous mineral grains and to preferentially reflocculate the scheelite grains for a period of time sufficient to produce upon flotation a concentrate having a grade of at least about 50% WO 3 , adding a frother to the collector conditioned slurry and subjecting the collector conditioned slurry to froth flotation to recover the froth product a scheelite concentration having a grade of at least about 50% WO 3 .
Inventors
- 👤 Eric J. Olin
- 👤 Harry B. Carson
- 👤 Brian Ball
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 09:06
CPC Classifications
B; B03; B03D; B03D1/00; B03D1/001; B03D1/002; B03D1/004; B03D1/008; B03D1/012; B03D1/016; B03D1/018; B03D1/02; B03D3/00; B03D3/06; B03D2201/00; B03D2201/02; B03D2201/04; B03D2201/06; B03D2203/00; B03D2203/02; B03D2203/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
262 words
A process for recovering a scheelite concentrate by froth flotation from a scheelite ore containing silicate minerals, other calcareous minerals and sulfide minerals which comprises grinding the ore sufficiently fine to liberate the scheelite grains while minimizing production of slimy fines; pulping the ore with water to form a slurry; conditioning the slurry with at least one alkali metal carbonate in small but effective amounts to depress the silicate minerals, the slurry having a pH value between about 10 and 11; conditioning the carbonate-containing slurry with an alkali metal cyanide in small but effective amounts to depress the sulfide minerals; conditioning the pH-adjusted slurry with at least one water-soluble alkali metal silicate selected from the group consisting of sodium silicate and potassium silicate in small but effective amounts to depress calcareous minerals other than scheelite; adding to the silicate-conditioned slurry at least one fatty acid collector selected from the group consisting of oleic acid, linoleic acid and tall oils in conjunction with an emulsifying agent in small but effective amounts to coat the scheelite grains; agitating the slurry to which the collector has been added with sufficient intensity to disintegrate floccules of scheelite, scheelite grains and other calcareous mineral grains and to preferentially reflocculate the scheelite grains for a time sufficient to produce upon flotation a concentrate having a grade of at least about 50% WO 3 ; adding a frother to the collector-conditioned slurry; and subjecting the collector-conditioned slurry to froth flotation to recover as a froth product a scheelite concentrate having a grade of at least 50% WO 3 .
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
262 words
A process for recovering a scheelite concentrate by froth flotation from a scheelite ore containing silicate minerals, other calcareous minerals and sulfide minerals which comprises grinding the ore sufficiently fine to liberate the scheelite grains while minimizing production of slimy fines; pulping the ore with water to form a slurry; conditioning the slurry with at least one alkali metal carbonate in small but effective amounts to depress the silicate minerals, the slurry having a pH value between about 10 and 11; conditioning the carbonate-containing slurry with an alkali metal cyanide in small but effective amounts to depress the sulfide minerals; conditioning the pH-adjusted slurry with at least one water-soluble alkali metal silicate selected from the group consisting of sodium silicate and potassium silicate in small but effective amounts to depress calcareous minerals other than scheelite; adding to the silicate-conditioned slurry at least one fatty acid collector selected from the group consisting of oleic acid, linoleic acid and tall oils in conjunction with an emulsifying agent in small but effective amounts to coat the scheelite grains; agitating the slurry to which the collector has been added with sufficient intensity to disintegrate floccules of scheelite, scheelite grains and other calcareous mineral grains and to preferentially reflocculate the scheelite grains for a time sufficient to produce upon flotation a concentrate having a grade of at least about 50% WO 3 ; adding a frother to the collector-conditioned slurry; and subjecting the collector-conditioned slurry to froth flotation to recover as a froth product a scheelite concentrate having a grade of at least 50% WO 3 .
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
The process as described in claim 1 wherein an alkali metal hydroxide is added to the carbonate-conditioned slurry if the pH value of the carbonate-conditioned slurry is less than about 10 to raise the pH value of the carbonate-conditioned slurry to a value between about 10 and about 11.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
The process as described in claims 1 wherein the ore is ground to a particle size of at least about 60% minus 200 mesh.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The process as described in claim 3 wherein the ground ore is pulped with water to form a slurry containing between about 20% solids and about 40% solids by weight.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
32 words
The process as described in claim 4 wherein the alkali metal carbonate is added to the slurry in amounts between about 5 pounds and about 15 pounds per ton of dry ore.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
The process as described in claim 5 wherein the alkali metal silicate is added to the slurry in an amount between about 3 pounds and about 10 pounds per ton of dry ore.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
33 words
The process as described in claim 6 wherein the fatty acid collector is added to the slurry in an amount between about 0.05 pound and about 0.25 pound per ton of dry ore.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
32 words
The process as described in claim 7 wherein the fatty acid is added to the slurry in an amount between about 0.08 pound and about 0.14 pound per ton of dry ore.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
The process as described in claim 7 wherein the fatty acid collector is a mixture of oleic and linoleic acid.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
The process as described in claim 7 wherein the slurry to which the collector has been added is agitated for at least about 5 minutes.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
26 words
The process as described in claim 10 wherein the pH value of the slurry is maintained at a value between about 10.5 and about 10.8 .
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US1953431A
Cited
US2120485A
Cited
US2040187A
Cited
US2373305A
Cited
US2741364A
Cited
US3589622A
Cited
US3915391A
Cited
US3985645A
Cited
US4040519A
Cited
US4054442A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-12-27 | 1986-06-28 | 1986-12-28 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-12-27 | 1990-06-28 | 1990-12-28 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-12-27 | 1994-06-28 | 1994-12-28 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |