← Back to Patent Explorer
US4363407A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and system for testing and sorting batteries

Assignee: Polaroid Corp
•
Filing: 1981-01-22
•
Granted: 1982-12-14
•
Expires: 2001-01-22
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method and system for testing and sorting a production run of sheet-like batteries includes: testing each battery to obtain a first value of electrical energy; placing machine readable indicia on each battery corresponding to the first value; retesting each battery after passage of a period of time to obtain a second value of electrical energy; machine reading the indicia and computing the rate of decay of electrical energy for each battery as a function of the difference between said first and second values per unit time; and sorting the batteries in accordance with the computed rate of decay to separate those batteries having an acceptable rate of decay from those batteries having too great a rate of decay.

Inventors

  • 👤 Sheldon A. Buckler
  • 👤 Jeffrey B. Burns
  • 👤 Alfredo G. Kniazzeh
  • 👤 Paul A. Plasse
  • 👤 David J. Sullivan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-24 03:35
CPC Classifications
B; B07; B07C; B07C5/00; B07C5/34; B07C5/344; G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/36; G01R31/385; G01R31/3865; G01R31/382; G01R31/3835

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim 213 words
The method of testing and sorting a production run of electric batteries prior to assembly and packaging thereof with related goods to be merchandised with individual batteries of such a production run, said method comprising the steps of: (a) testing each individual battery of the production run to obtain a first value of electrical energy for each such battery; (b) forming machine readable indicia on each such battery corresponding to said first value; (c) storing the batteries after completion of steps (a) and (b); (d) retesting each of the individual batteries after passage of an elapsed period of time following step (a) to obtain a second value of electrical energy for each battery; (e) machine reading said indicia and computing, in accordance with said elapsed period of time of each battery, the rate of decay of electrical energy for each individual battery as a function of the difference between said first and second values per unit time; and (f) sorting said batteries in accordance with said computed rate of decay to separate those individual batteries of the production run having a rate of stored energy decay extending an acceptable value from those batteries of the same production run having a rate of stored energy decay equal to or lower than said acceptable value.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 213 words
The method of testing and sorting a production run of electric batteries prior to assembly and packaging thereof with related goods to be merchandised with individual batteries of such a production run, said method comprising the steps of: (a) testing each individual battery of the production run to obtain a first value of electrical energy for each such battery; (b) forming machine readable indicia on each such battery corresponding to said first value; (c) storing the batteries after completion of steps (a) and (b); (d) retesting each of the individual batteries after passage of an elapsed period of time following step (a) to obtain a second value of electrical energy for each battery; (e) machine reading said indicia and computing, in accordance with said elapsed period of time of each battery, the rate of decay of electrical energy for each individual battery as a function of the difference between said first and second values per unit time; and (f) sorting said batteries in accordance with said computed rate of decay to separate those individual batteries of the production run having a rate of stored energy decay extending an acceptable value from those batteries of the same production run having a rate of stored energy decay equal to or lower than said acceptable value.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 1 including forming, prior to step (c) on each battery, machine readable indicia representative of the time of testing in step (a), and computing in step (c) the elapsed period of time between step (a) and step (d).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said step of storing the batteries comprises storing the batteries for variable periods of time.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 64 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of sorting the batteries after completion of steps (a) and (b) in accordance with the first value of electrical energy to separate those individual batteries having a first value of electrical energy above or below an acceptable range of first values from those batteries having a first value of electrical energy within said acceptable range.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said step of storing the batteries comprises storing the batteries for a fixed period of time so that said computing of the rate of decay is a function solely of the difference between said first and second values.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said step of forming machine readable indicia includes forming said indicia by a non-contact printer.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said step of forming machine readable indicia includes forming said indicia with only negligible force applied to said battery.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 33 words
The method of claim 7, wherein said step of forming said machine readable indicia is provided by directing ink to said battery to form said indicia by means of an ink jet printer.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 213 words
The method of testing and sorting a production run of sheet-like, rectangular electric batteries of the type having terminals presented through an exterior layer receptive to placement of indicia by printing, said method comprising the steps of: (a) testing each individual battery of the production run to obtain a first value of electrical energy for each such battery; (b) placing machine readable indicia on said exterior layer of each such battery corresponding to said first value; (c) storing the batteries after completion of steps (a) and (b); (d) retesting each of the individual batteries after passage of an elapsed period of time to obtain a second value of electrical energy for each battery; (e) machine reading said indicia and computing, in accordance with said elapsed period of time of each battery, the rate of decay of electrical energy for each individual battery as a function of the difference between said first and second values per unit time; and (f) sorting said batteries in accordance with said computed rate of decay to separate those individual batteries of the production run having a rate of stored energy decay exceeding an acceptable value from those batteries of the same production run having a rate of stored energy decay equal to or lower than said acceptable value.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 213 words
The method of testing and sorting a production run of sheet-like, rectangular electric batteries of the type having terminals presented through an exterior layer receptive to placement of indicia by printing, said method comprising the steps of: (a) testing each individual battery of the production run to obtain a first value of electrical energy for each such battery; (b) placing machine readable indicia on said exterior layer of each such battery corresponding to said first value; (c) storing the batteries after completion of steps (a) and (b); (d) retesting each of the individual batteries after passage of an elapsed period of time to obtain a second value of electrical energy for each battery; (e) machine reading said indicia and computing, in accordance with said elapsed period of time of each battery, the rate of decay of electrical energy for each individual battery as a function of the difference between said first and second values per unit time; and (f) sorting said batteries in accordance with said computed rate of decay to separate those individual batteries of the production run having a rate of stored energy decay exceeding an acceptable value from those batteries of the same production run having a rate of stored energy decay equal to or lower than said acceptable value.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 9 including forming, prior to step (c) on each battery, machine readable indicia representative of the time of testing in step (a), and computing in step (d) the elapsed period of time between step (a) and step (d).
Claim 13
Independent Claim 193 words
A system for testing and sorting a production run of electric batteries prior to assembly and packaging thereof with related goods to be merchandised with individual batteries of such a production run, said system comprising: testing and marking means for obtaining a first value of electrical energy for each individual battery of the production run and for placing machine readable indicia on each such battery corresponding to said first value; testing and reading means for obtaining a second value of electrical energy for each battery after an elapsed period of time, for machine reading said indicia and for computing, in accordance with the elapsed period of time of each battery, the rate of decay of electrical energy for each individual battery as a function of the difference between said first and second values per unit time; and means for sorting said batteries in accordance with said computed rate of decay to separate those individual batteries of the production run having a rate of stored energy decay exceeding an acceptable value from those batteries of the same production run having a rate of stored energy decay equal to or lower than said acceptable value.
Claim 14
Independent Claim 193 words
A system for testing and sorting a production run of electric batteries prior to assembly and packaging thereof with related goods to be merchandised with individual batteries of such a production run, said system comprising: testing and marking means for obtaining a first value of electrical energy for each individual battery of the production run and for placing machine readable indicia on each such battery corresponding to said first value; testing and reading means for obtaining a second value of electrical energy for each battery after an elapsed period of time, for machine reading said indicia and for computing, in accordance with the elapsed period of time of each battery, the rate of decay of electrical energy for each individual battery as a function of the difference between said first and second values per unit time; and means for sorting said batteries in accordance with said computed rate of decay to separate those individual batteries of the production run having a rate of stored energy decay exceeding an acceptable value from those batteries of the same production run having a rate of stored energy decay equal to or lower than said acceptable value.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 58 words
The system of claim 11 wherein said testing and marking means includes means for also placing machine readable indicia on each battery representative of the time of obtaining said first value and said testing and reading means includes means for reading the time of obtaining said first value and computing the elapsed period of time for each battery.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 17 words
The system of claim 11, wherein said marking means is a non-contact printer spaced from said batteries.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 32 words
The system of claim 11, further including preliminary means, responsive to said means for obtaining a first value, for sorting said batteries in accordance with said obtained first value of electrical energy.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 17 words
The system of claim 11, wherein the testing and marking means are juxtaposed at a single station.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 17 words
The system of claim 11, wherein the testing and reading means are juxtaposed at a single station.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US2540225A Cited
US3464549A Cited
US3761806A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1985-12-13 1986-06-14 1986-12-14 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1989-12-13 1990-06-14 1990-12-14 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1993-12-13 1994-06-14 1994-12-14 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag