← Back to Patent Explorer
US4358849A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method of checking validity of coded alpha/numeric signals with a data processor and a memory

Assignee: Compagnie Internationale pour l'Informatique CII-Honeywell Bull SA
•
Filing: 1979-11-13
•
Granted: 1982-11-09
•
Expires: 1999-11-13
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The validity of a code, such as an alpha-numeric code, constituted by a series of elements and including a checking key corresponding to the digit value of the first element of the code, is checked by a memory including an addressable dual-input table having a number of rows at least equal to the maximum number of elements of the code and a number of columns at least equal to all the possible numerical values of the code element. Columns and rows of the table are respectively addressed by the numerical value of a code element and by the relative position of the code elements in the code. The location defined by the intersection of the addressed column and row contains an entry for a remainder resulting from division by a given modulus of the numerical value of the code element multiplied by a coefficient assigned to the position. Each element of the code and the corresponding remainder contained in the location of the memory addressed by the code element are read by a processing means. The processing means adds the read remainder to a previous remainder and divides the sum of the addition operation by the modulus to obtain a new remainder. The checking key associated with each code is stored in the first row of the table. The checking key or first remainder are such that the final remainder obtained for the last element of the code is equal to zero when the code is correctly read.

Inventors

  • 👤 Jacques Sery

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-05 07:39
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/07; G06F11/08; G06F11/10; G06F11/1008; G06F11/1012; G06F11/104; G07; G07D; G07D7/00; G07D7/004; G07D7/0047

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim 665 words
A method of checking the validity of coded signals adapted to represent alpha and numerical values, each of said coded signals consisting of (a) a series of code elements and (b) a checking key corresponding to a digit value of a first element of the coded signals, the coded signal being checked with a data processing means and a memory including an addressable dual input table having a number of rows at least equal to the maximum number of code elements of each coded signal and a number of columns at least equal to all the possible numerical values of a code element, columns and rows in said table being respectively addressed by the numerical value of a code element and by the relative position of said code element in the coded signal, the location defined by the intersection of the addressed column and said row containing an entry for a remainder, the remainder having a value equal to the numerical value of said code element multiplied by a coefficient assigned to the relative position divided by a given modulus, comprising the steps of, in the data processing means: (I) reading a code element, (II) checking each code element read during operation (I) to determine if the code element represents a numerical value, in response to the code element representing a numerical value: (A) determining if the read code element has a numerical value equal to zero, in response to the read code element not being equal to zero: (a) determining the address of the row and column of the corresponding remainder in the table, the column in the table being determined from the value of the read numerical code element, the row in the table being determined from the serial position of the read numerical code element in the series of numerical code elements, (b) reading the remainder from the table corresponding to the appropriate column and row, (c) determining if the first numerical code element in the series is being processed, (i) in response to there being a determination that the first numerical code element in the series is being processed adding the checking key to the remainder read during operation (b), (ii) in response to there being a determination that the first numerical code element in the series is not being processed adding the remainder read during operation (b) to the previous remainder; (d) determining whether the total obtained during operation (c) is greater than or equal to the given modulus, (i) only in response to the total obtained during operation (c) being not less than the modulus, subtracting the modulus from the total obtained during operation (c), (B) incrementing the series position of the read code element position in the sequence by a count of one in accordance with one of: (a) immediately after the operation (A) if operation (A) determines that the code element has a numerical value of zero, or (b) immediately after determining operation (A) (d) if operation (A) (d) determines that the total obtained during operation (A) (c) is less than the given modulus, or (c) after operation (A) (d) (i) if operation (A) (d) determines that the total obtained during operation (A) (d) is greater than or equal to the given modulus, (C) determining whether the incremented series position from operation (B) is greater than the given modulus; (III) shifting to the next numerical code element in the sequence: (A) immediately after operation (II) determining that the code is not for a numerical value, or (B) in response to operation (II) (C) determining that the incremented series position from operation (II) (B) is not greater than the given modulus; (IV) determining whether the next numerical code in the sequence, as reached during shifting operation (III), is the last code element in the sequence, (A) in response to operation (IV) indicating that the code element reached during operation (III) is not the last code element in the sequence, returning to operation (I) and then repeating the sequence.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 665 words
A method of checking the validity of coded signals adapted to represent alpha and numerical values, each of said coded signals consisting of (a) a series of code elements and (b) a checking key corresponding to a digit value of a first element of the coded signals, the coded signal being checked with a data processing means and a memory including an addressable dual input table having a number of rows at least equal to the maximum number of code elements of each coded signal and a number of columns at least equal to all the possible numerical values of a code element, columns and rows in said table being respectively addressed by the numerical value of a code element and by the relative position of said code element in the coded signal, the location defined by the intersection of the addressed column and said row containing an entry for a remainder, the remainder having a value equal to the numerical value of said code element multiplied by a coefficient assigned to the relative position divided by a given modulus, comprising the steps of, in the data processing means: (I) reading a code element, (II) checking each code element read during operation (I) to determine if the code element represents a numerical value, in response to the code element representing a numerical value: (A) determining if the read code element has a numerical value equal to zero, in response to the read code element not being equal to zero: (a) determining the address of the row and column of the corresponding remainder in the table, the column in the table being determined from the value of the read numerical code element, the row in the table being determined from the serial position of the read numerical code element in the series of numerical code elements, (b) reading the remainder from the table corresponding to the appropriate column and row, (c) determining if the first numerical code element in the series is being processed, (i) in response to there being a determination that the first numerical code element in the series is being processed adding the checking key to the remainder read during operation (b), (ii) in response to there being a determination that the first numerical code element in the series is not being processed adding the remainder read during operation (b) to the previous remainder; (d) determining whether the total obtained during operation (c) is greater than or equal to the given modulus, (i) only in response to the total obtained during operation (c) being not less than the modulus, subtracting the modulus from the total obtained during operation (c), (B) incrementing the series position of the read code element position in the sequence by a count of one in accordance with one of: (a) immediately after the operation (A) if operation (A) determines that the code element has a numerical value of zero, or (b) immediately after determining operation (A) (d) if operation (A) (d) determines that the total obtained during operation (A) (c) is less than the given modulus, or (c) after operation (A) (d) (i) if operation (A) (d) determines that the total obtained during operation (A) (d) is greater than or equal to the given modulus, (C) determining whether the incremented series position from operation (B) is greater than the given modulus; (III) shifting to the next numerical code element in the sequence: (A) immediately after operation (II) determining that the code is not for a numerical value, or (B) in response to operation (II) (C) determining that the incremented series position from operation (II) (B) is not greater than the given modulus; (IV) determining whether the next numerical code in the sequence, as reached during shifting operation (III), is the last code element in the sequence, (A) in response to operation (IV) indicating that the code element reached during operation (III) is not the last code element in the sequence, returning to operation (I) and then repeating the sequence.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method of claim 1 wherein operation (II) (B) is performed after operation (II) (A) without executing operations (II) (A) (a)-(II) (A) in response to operation (II) (A) determining that the read code element is equal to zero.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method of claim 1 wherein operation (II) (B) is performed after operation (II) (A) (d) without performing subtracting operation (II) (A) (d) (i) in response to the total of the remainder read from the table during operation (II) (A) (d) being less than the modulus.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising validating the coded signal as a numerical value in response to a remainder resulting from operation (II) (A) (d) (i) for the final element of the series being zero.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 1 further including counting down the code position indicating which of the elements in the code exceeds a predetermined limit.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 45 words
A method of claim 1 wherein the table in the memory contains at least 10×N address, where N is the maximum number of positions in a code, each of said code positions containing in coded form a remainder at most equal to the corresponding modulus.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 6 wherein each table contains 256 addresses corresponding to (10+6) numerical values and 16 possible positions for a code element.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 6 wherein each address in the table has at least one binary octet recorded at it.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 8 wherein each octet is a direct binary transcription of the decimal value of the appropriate remainder.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3303463A Cited
US3571581A Cited
US3778765A Cited
US3913067A Cited
US4065752A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1985-11-08 1986-05-10 1986-11-09 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1989-11-08 1990-05-10 1990-11-09 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1993-11-08 1994-05-10 1994-11-09 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag