← Back to Patent Explorer
US4351810A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for removing sulfur dioxide from a gas stream

Assignee: United States, A REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY OF COMMERCE
•
Filing: 1981-07-09
•
Granted: 1982-09-28
•
Expires: 2001-07-09
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method is provided for removing SO 2 from gas streams by its gas-phase reaction with a stabilized Criegee intermediate under conditions where a very large excess of water vapor is avoided, resulting in efficient scavenging of SO 2 by the Criegee intermediate to form an adduct. The adduct reacts with water vapor to convert it directly to sulfuric acid, which is then separated from the gas stream. The Criegee intermediate may be generated in a variety of ways.

Inventors

  • 👤 Richard I. Martinez
  • 👤 John T. Herron

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-02 20:15
CPC Classifications
B; B01; B01D; B01D53/00; B01D53/34; B01D53/46; B01D53/48; B01D53/50; B01D53/507; B01D53/60; Y; Y02; Y02A; Y02A50/00; Y02A50/20

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim 146 words
A method of removing SO 2 from an industrial flue gas, exhaust gas or waste gas stream, which comprises the steps of: (a) determining the moisture content of the gas, and, where the moisture content is more than about 1000 times the SO 2 concentration, reducing the moisture content below about 1000 times the SO 2 concentration; (b) contacting the gas stream with an amount of a stabilized Criegee intermediate sufficient to scavenge the SO 2 in the gas and form a Criegee-SO 2 adduct, the diversion of the stabilized Criegee intermediate by water being less than about 10%; (c) hydrolysing the Criegee-SO 2 adduct at an H 2 O concentration of at least 2 times the initial SO 2 concentration, to convert the adduct directly to H 2 SO 4 and oxoalkane; and (d) separating the resultant H 2 SO 4 from the gas stream.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 146 words
A method of removing SO 2 from an industrial flue gas, exhaust gas or waste gas stream, which comprises the steps of: (a) determining the moisture content of the gas, and, where the moisture content is more than about 1000 times the SO 2 concentration, reducing the moisture content below about 1000 times the SO 2 concentration; (b) contacting the gas stream with an amount of a stabilized Criegee intermediate sufficient to scavenge the SO 2 in the gas and form a Criegee-SO 2 adduct, the diversion of the stabilized Criegee intermediate by water being less than about 10%; (c) hydrolysing the Criegee-SO 2 adduct at an H 2 O concentration of at least 2 times the initial SO 2 concentration, to convert the adduct directly to H 2 SO 4 and oxoalkane; and (d) separating the resultant H 2 SO 4 from the gas stream.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 126 words
The method of claim 1, wherein in step (a), the temperature of the gas stream is adjusted to not more than about 150° C., and ozone is introduced into the gas stream in an amount of at least about 4 moles per mole of SO 2 and at least about an additional 2 moles per mole of any NO x in the gas stream, thereby converting at least a portion of the NO x to NO 2 , N 2 O 5 or HNO 3 ; wherein in step (b), a compound or radical capable of reacting with ozone to generate a stabilized Criegee intermediate is introduced into the gas stream; and wherein in step (d), any HNO 3 is also separated from the gas stream.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 71 words
The method of claim 2, wherein in step (b), said compound is an alkene having the formula R 1 R 2 C═CR 3 R 4 , wherein R 1 , R 2 , R 3 and R 4 are each independently H or C 1-10 alkyl; and the stabilized Criegee intermediate has the formula ##STR6## wherein R 1 , R 2 , R 3 and R 4 are as defined hereinabove.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 3, wherein R 1 , R 2 , R 3 and R 4 are each independently H, CH 3 or C 2 H 5 .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 10 words
The method of claim 3, wherein the alkene is tetramethylethylene.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 10 words
The method of claim 3, wherein the alkene is propylene.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 3, wherein the alkene is a butenes fraction from a petroleum refining process.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 2, wherein in step (b), said compound is an aldehyde having the formula R 5 CHO, wherein R 5 is H or C 1-10 -alkyl.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 8, wherein R 5 is C 1-3 alkyl.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein in step (b), the stabilized Criegee intermediate is generated by photolysis of ketene or diazomethane, in the presence of oxygen.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method of claim 2, wherein in step (b), said radical is CH 3 , generated by mercury-sensitized decomposition of N 2 O in the presence of an alkene, or by photolysis of nitromethane or dimethylazide.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 59 words
The method of claim 1, wherein in step (a), the moisture content is reduced below about 100 times the SO 2 concentration when the initially determined moisture content is more than about 100 times the SO 2 concentration in the gas stream; whereby diversion of the stabilized Criegee intermediate by water in step (b) is less than about 1%.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1, which further comprises the step of passing the effluent from step (d) through a high temperature combustor.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method of claim 1, which further comprises the step of feeding at least a portion of the effluent from step (d) as combustion air to a clean utility boiler.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 1, wherein additional water vapor is introduced in step (d) to increase the rate of hydrolysis of the Criegee-SO 2 adduct.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 12, wherein additional water vapor is introduced in step (d) to increase the rate of hydrolysis of the Criegee-SO 2 adduct.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US2819279A Cited
JPS5120068A Cited
DE2703882A1 Cited
US4213944A Cited
US4191732A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1985-09-27 1986-03-29 1986-09-28 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1989-09-27 1990-03-29 1990-09-28 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1993-09-27 1994-03-29 1994-09-28 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag