US4344907A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus providing uniform resin distribution in a coextruded product
Assignee: Mobil Oil AS
•
Filing: 1980-10-30
•
Granted: 1982-08-17
•
Expires: 2000-10-30
Abstract
Abstract Disclosed is a method and apparatus for ensuring uniform distribution of higher and lower viscosity or flow rate resins in a product produced by a coextrusion process. A flow restriction is provided in the flow path of the lower viscosity or flow rate resin to increase the pressure drop of this resin as it passes through a coextrusion die. The increased pressure drop introduced by the flow restriction causes the lower viscosity or flow rate resin to be more uniformly distributed in the extruded product. A specific die construction providing a uniform resin flow channel within the die is also described.
Inventors
- 👤 Fox J. Herrington
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 08:46
CPC Classifications
B; B29; B29C; B29C48/00; B29C48/25; B29C48/36; B29C48/50; B29C48/695; B29C48/70; B29C48/03; B29C48/09; B29C48/10; B29C48/16; B29C48/18; B29C48/21; B29C48/30; B29C48/32; B29C48/335; B29C48/337; B29C48/338; B29C48/34; B29C48/92; B29C2948/00; B29C2948/92; B29C2948/92504; B29C2948/92514; B29C2948/9258; B29C2948/926; B29C2948/92695; B29C2948/9279; B29C2948/92819; B29C2948/92857; B29C2948/92876
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
249 words
A method of coextruding a first molten resin stream of relatively high viscosity or flow rate and a second molten resin stream of relatively low viscosity or flow rate through a tubular die orifice in uniform laminar flow comprising the steps of: flowing said first stream under pressure from a first molten resin supply through a first die channel to a flow junction region adjacent said die orifice; flowing said second stream under pressure from a second resin supply through a second die channel to said flow junction region, said second die channel containing a flow restriction for impeding the flow of said second stream and raising the pressure drop of said second molten resin at said junction region to a value considerably larger than the maximum difference in pressure drop of said second molten resin existing at said junction region along the terminus of said second channel in the absence of said flow restriction, said restriction also being sufficient to decrease the pressure differential that would exist from one side of the die to the other in the absence of said flow restriction said decrease being of a magnitude sufficient to prevent non-uniform coextrusion of said first and second resin streams; joining said first and second molten streams at said junction region; flowing said joined first and second molten streams from said junction region through said die orifice in laminar flow relationship to obtain a coextruded resin material having a uniform distribution of first and second resins therein.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
249 words
A method of coextruding a first molten resin stream of relatively high viscosity or flow rate and a second molten resin stream of relatively low viscosity or flow rate through a tubular die orifice in uniform laminar flow comprising the steps of: flowing said first stream under pressure from a first molten resin supply through a first die channel to a flow junction region adjacent said die orifice; flowing said second stream under pressure from a second resin supply through a second die channel to said flow junction region, said second die channel containing a flow restriction for impeding the flow of said second stream and raising the pressure drop of said second molten resin at said junction region to a value considerably larger than the maximum difference in pressure drop of said second molten resin existing at said junction region along the terminus of said second channel in the absence of said flow restriction, said restriction also being sufficient to decrease the pressure differential that would exist from one side of the die to the other in the absence of said flow restriction said decrease being of a magnitude sufficient to prevent non-uniform coextrusion of said first and second resin streams; joining said first and second molten streams at said junction region; flowing said joined first and second molten streams from said junction region through said die orifice in laminar flow relationship to obtain a coextruded resin material having a uniform distribution of first and second resins therein.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
140 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein said second die channel and associated flow restriction provide a minimum pressure drop ΔP min in said second stream at said junction region of: ##EQU3## where ΔP 1 is the average pressure drop of said first stream at said junction region, e is the error in total resin flow through the die orifice along its terminus, where the maximum total resin flow through said orifice=(1+e)×minimum total resin flow through said orifice, and n 1 and n 2 are respective flow exponents of said first and second streams in said first and second die channels, each defined by the equation τ=Kδ n where τ is the shear stress of a respective stream, K is the viscosity at a shear rate=1 of a respective stream, and δ is the shear rate of a respective stream.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
118 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said second channel and associated flow restriction provide a minimum pressure drop ΔP min of said second molten stream at said junction region of ##EQU4## and ΔP 1 is the average pressure drop of said first stream at said junction region, h is the error in the effective gap of said first channel, where the maximum effective gap=(1+h)×the minimum effective gap, and e 1 is the error in flow of said second molten stream along the terminus of said second channel at said junction region, where the maximum resin flow of said second stream at said second channel terminus=(1+e 1 )×minimum resin flow of said second stream at said second channel terminus.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
222 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein said second channel and associated flow restriction provide a pressure drop ΔP min of said second molten resin at said junction region which is the larger of ΔP A and ΔP B where ##EQU5## and ΔP l is the average pressure drop of said first stream at said junction region, e is the error in total resin flow through the die orifice along its terminus, h is the error in the effective gap of said first channel, e 1 is the error in flow of said second molten stream along the terminus of said second channel at said junction region, n 1 and n 2 are respective flow exponents of said first and second streams in said die channels defined by the equation τ=Kδ n where τ is the shear stress of a respective stream, K is the viscosity at a shear rate=1 of a respective stream, δ is the shear rate of a respective stream, and the maximum total resin flow through said orifice=(1+e)×the minimum total resin flow through said orifice, the maximum effective gap of said first channel=(1+h)×the minimum effective gap of said first channel, and the maximum resin flow of said second stream at said second channel terminus=(1+e 1 )×the minimum resin flow of said second stream at said second channel terminus.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
216 words
An apparatus for coextruding a first molten resin stream of relatively high viscosity or flow rate and a second molten resin stream of relatively low viscosity or flow rate comprising: a source of said first molten resin; a source of said second molten resin; a tubular coextrusion die comprising an extrusion orifice for producing a coextruded resin material, a first resin flow channel coupled to said first molten resin source and terminating at a flow junction region adjacent said orifice, a second resin flow channel coupled to said second molten resin source and terminating at said flow junction region, said second flow channel containing a flow restriction therein for impeding the flow of said second molten resin therethrough and raising the pressure drop therein to a value considerably larger than the maximum difference in pressure drop of said second molten resin existing at said junction region along the terminus of said second channel in the absence of said flow restriction, said flow restriction also decreasing the pressure differential that would exist from one side of the die to the other in the absence of said flow restriction said decreasing being of a magnitude sufficient to prevent non-uniform coextruding of said first and second resin streams and, a flow channel coupling said junction region to said orifice.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
216 words
An apparatus for coextruding a first molten resin stream of relatively high viscosity or flow rate and a second molten resin stream of relatively low viscosity or flow rate comprising: a source of said first molten resin; a source of said second molten resin; a tubular coextrusion die comprising an extrusion orifice for producing a coextruded resin material, a first resin flow channel coupled to said first molten resin source and terminating at a flow junction region adjacent said orifice, a second resin flow channel coupled to said second molten resin source and terminating at said flow junction region, said second flow channel containing a flow restriction therein for impeding the flow of said second molten resin therethrough and raising the pressure drop therein to a value considerably larger than the maximum difference in pressure drop of said second molten resin existing at said junction region along the terminus of said second channel in the absence of said flow restriction, said flow restriction also decreasing the pressure differential that would exist from one side of the die to the other in the absence of said flow restriction said decreasing being of a magnitude sufficient to prevent non-uniform coextruding of said first and second resin streams and, a flow channel coupling said junction region to said orifice.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
143 words
An apparatus as in claim 5 wherein said second die channel and associated flow restriction provide a minimum pressure drop ΔP min in said second molten resin at said junction region of: ##EQU6## where ΔP 1 is the average pressure drop of said first molten resin at said junction region, e is the error in total resin flow through the die orifice along its terminus, where the maximum total resin flow through said orifice=(1+e)×the minimum resin flow through said orifice, and n 1 and n 2 are respective flow exponents of said first and second molten resins in said first and second die channels, each defined by the equation τ=Kδ n where τ is the shear stress of a respective resin, K is the viscosity at a shear rate=1 of a respective resin, and δ is the shear rate of a respective resin.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
126 words
An apparatus as in claim 5 wherein said second channel and associated flow restriction provide a minimum pressure drop ΔP min of said second molten resin at said junction region of ##EQU7## and ΔP 1 is the average pressure drop of said first molten resin at said junction region, h is the error in effective gap of said first channel, e 1 is the error in flow of said second molten resin along the terminus of said second channel at said junction region, where the maximum effective gap of said first channel=(1+h)×the minimum effective gap of said first channel, and the maximum resin flow of said second resin at said second channel terminus=(1+e 1 )×minimum resin flow of said second resin at said second channel terminus.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
222 words
An apparatus as in claim 5 wherein said second channel and associated flow restriction provide a minimum pressure drop ΔP min of said second molten resin at said junction region which is the larger of ΔP A and ΔP B where: ##EQU8## and ΔP l is the average pressure drop of said first molten resin at said junction region, e is the error in total resin flow through the die orifice along its terminus, h is the error in effective gap of said first, e 1 is the error in flow of said second molten resin along the terminus of said second channel at said junction region, n 1 and n 2 are respective flow exponents of said first and second resins in said die channels, each defined by the equation τ=Kδ n where τ is the shear stress of a respective resin, K is the viscosity at a shear rate=1 of a respective resin, and δ is the shear rate of a respective resin, and the total maximum resin flow through said orifice=(1+e)×total minimum resin flow through said orifice, the maximum effective gap of said first channel terminus=(1+h)×the minimum effective gap of said first channel, and the maximum flow of said second resin at said second channel terminus=(1+e 1 )×the minimum flow of said second resin at said second channel terminus.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
98 words
An apparatus as in claim 5 wherein said second channel is defined by first and second opposing die surfaces, each respectively provided on first and second die members, said first and second die members engaging with one another at respective planar engaging faces, the planar engaging face of said first die member being in parallel with at least a portion of the opposing die surface of said first die member and the planar engaging face of said second die member being in parallel with at least a portion of the opposing die surface of said second die member.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
23 words
An apparatus as in claim 9 wherein said flow restriction is provided by a stepped die surface on one of said die members.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2824337A
Cited
US2859476A
Cited
US2978748A
Cited
US3419938A
Cited
US3365750A
Cited
US3555128A
Cited
US3694292A
Cited
US3737260A
Cited
DE2153466A1
Cited
US4043739A
Cited
US4061461A
Cited
US4152387A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-08-16 | 1986-02-15 | 1986-08-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-08-16 | 1990-02-15 | 1990-08-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-08-16 | 1994-02-15 | 1994-08-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |